IBM Rational Performance Tester Previous Solutions
My arrival on the client site was after the product had already been chosen by the client. I did not participate in the selection/evaluation process that had occurred.
View full review »We previously used HP Performance Center. We changed due to HP overcharging for additional protocols needed for testing. IBM Rational Performance Tester does not charge any additional fees.
View full review »I did not switch solutions. Our company had this solution; it was the available product to deliver the services.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, OpenText, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We previously used HP LoadRunner and switched because the license is cheaper.
View full review »We chose this product because the client had a full contract with IBM for software services.
View full review »I have used a variety of the tools that are available.
View full review »Previously, I used JMeter, because if we are talking about the open version JMeter is nearly perfect in usability and reliability side. But, since the organization changed, I needed the more powerful tools.
View full review »JMeter was used previously, but we found it limited in terms of protocol support, scalability, and lack of support for the entire test process i.e., analysis and reporting.
View full review »I hadn't used a similar solution before.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, OpenText, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.