IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Pros and Cons
IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Pros
Kumar Gaurav Jain
Architect: Service Virtualization, DevOps and Automation at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations.
View full review »
Rekha Chotara
IT Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
As we have used most of the MQ stub, "MQ recording" is the most useful feature.
View full review »IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Cons
Kumar Gaurav Jain
Architect: Service Virtualization, DevOps and Automation at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
User friendliness: I would rate it somewhere around 5/10 in terms of user-friendliness. It can be simpler to build stubs and middle-ware based test cases compared to the solution given by RTVS.
View full review »Rekha Chotara
IT Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, CA (A Broadcom Company), Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: November 2019.
382,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.