IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Pros and Cons
IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Pros
Kumar Gaurav Jain
Architect: Service Virtualization, DevOps and Automation at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations.
View full review »
Rekha Chotara
IT Analyst at Tata Consultancy Services
As we have used most of the MQ stub, "MQ recording" is the most useful feature.
View full review »IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Cons
Kumar Gaurav Jain
Architect: Service Virtualization, DevOps and Automation at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
User friendliness: I would rate it somewhere around 5/10 in terms of user-friendliness. It can be simpler to build stubs and middle-ware based test cases compared to the solution given by RTVS.
View full review »Rekha Chotara
IT Analyst at Tata Consultancy Services
Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: March 2020.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.