IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Initial Setup
Product setup is straightforward.
View full review »Initial setup was complicated because TAM was implemented as a part of the IDM solution. It took me a long time to set up the directory integration among many user stores, e.g., Tivoli Identity Manager, Active Directory, Lotus Domino Directory, application user store using database.
View full review »RV
Roopesh Verma
Senior Consultant at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
It was complex for us as we have multiple domains.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Single Sign-On (SSO)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Okta, Broadcom and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared to the Oracle setup, the initial setup was straightforward.
View full review »In v8.0.1 (several years ago), the out-of-the-box solution was very complex and required a huge amount of IBM's time (at cost to the client!) in order to implement the entire solution (test/uat/prod clusters).
Due to the nature of our business and the complication around some of the applications we deploy and wanted SSO to manage, this made the production implementation of SSO take in excess of one and a half years.
View full review »Initial setup is straightforward, but we might have to consider the solution architecture to make full use of its components' capacity.
View full review »The initial setup is always complex due to number of applications and user base involved. As the product is a front door for all applications this is very critical and complex setup. Also due to internal and external users and multiple authentication mechanisms involved for different type of users it gets complicated.
View full review »RV
Roopesh Verma
Senior Consultant at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Setup of the appliance it straightforward.
View full review »The initial set-up is a bit complex for a novice as the Linux version of it needs you to be somewhat good with Linux. There are certain OS requirements which if you are not familiar with Linux, you going to struggle a bit.
View full review »With the firmware appliance it is easy as pie.
View full review »Not as straight forward as Microsoft products where the dependencies are bundled in the installation.
View full review »It is straightforward. However it also takes experience to roll out this product.
View full review »It needs quite a lot of time to design the architecture and properly layout the deployment for the high availability setup.
View full review »It totally depends on the way the client wants to set up and implement the product. The security requires complex implementation. This is where no one wants to compromise.
View full review »Initial setup in older versions was quite complex, but with the newer versions it is quite simple. The product also comes with a pre-configured appliance.
View full review »I was not involved in the initial roll-out but did participate in the upgrades from v4.1 to v5.1 and from v5.1 to v6.1. Junction file format changed from v5.1 to v6.1 which cause some challenges.
View full review »Initial set-up is straightforward.
View full review »Many components needed to be installed with even more prerequisites. Each component had a sequence to follow.
View full review »Complex. Like I mentioned, there are so many moving parts and I had issues with DB2 installation and patching it up to latest versions. This seems typical but others may have had better experiences.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Single Sign-On (SSO)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Okta, Broadcom and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.