It is a very stable product. 

The tool is very stable. It is more stable than Moogsoft. Everything is very well documented in NetCool. The vendor support is good. The tool has a vast document library. If we refer to the library, there are very few chances of missing out on details while creating the instance. There are fewer chances of error. Our system will not break down in the middle of the operations.

Netcool is very stable, we haven't had any downtime.

Tivoli NetCool is pretty stable.

It's stable. I've been working with the Tivoli Suite for seven years and it's very, very stable. IBM gives us good features compared to the market. They have good upgrades and good support.

NetCool is a very stable solution. When I logged on this morning, I noticed that NetCool had been running for over 350 days. You do not need to restart it, and there is no maintenance that you need to do.

IBM Tivoli Netcool is a stable solution.

I've found the solution to have a stability similar to SolarWinds. It may even be a bit more stable than that. It's quite good.

There are always bugs and there are many fix packs released for the various components. But in general terms, I would say it is a fairly stable product. Some of the newer features around analytics have proved to have many bugs, but these features have been improved over the last couple of years. The base functionality is generally very stable, indeed.  

There are always a few bugs here and there. However, the main thing is that IBM is no longer investing in the solution anymore. Therefore, no bug fixes will be coming for those that still exist.