IBM WebSphere Application Server Pros and Cons

It does integrate well with the Tivoli Federated Identity Management system.

The solution is robust. The connection management and the scalability, which IBM provides to the Stack, are also valuable.

We needed this type of integration and WebShepere is the best tool for it.

High availability, alert management, and deployments are the most valuable features for us. We have the ND version so we can do deployments.

This solution is easy to use with a GUI that is intuitive and very helpful.

The scalability of the product is quite good.

It has good stability of the application server in the long term compared to other solutions.

The most valuable feature of this solution is Portal Virtualization.

Based on the field and based on the build that was provided, we've noticed a lot of constraints in terms of the performance now.

They should make the solution more lightweight and not bundle everything into a single product.

I think that this is a good product but I think that the cloud environment could be improved. I think that the future is in the utilization of the product in a product as a service way which is something that is lacking at this moment.

The footprint could be reduced so that we can use a smaller virtual machine to run the application. We could also use more scripts. I would like this solution to be more script oriented, rather than GUI oriented.

Some things are very difficult to do, so the interface and usage could be more intuitive for those.

The availability of the solution needs improvement.

It should be able to serve more concurrent requests like Oracle. Oracle has more powerful stability, availability, and real-time serving.

In the next release of this solution, I would like to see support for the Arabic language.