IBM WebSphere Application Server Logo

IBM WebSphere Application Server pros and cons

Vendor: IBM
3.9 out of 5
760 followers
Post review
 

IBM WebSphere Application Server Pros review quotes

SR
Nov 19, 2020
It does integrate well with the Tivoli Federated Identity Management system.
PO
Jul 6, 2021
As compared to other applications, it has tremendous support. We have built internal capability so that we use it extensively internally. It is also easier to use with the outside data. You can write in ESQL, Java, or any other technology that you want to use for development. So, it is a lot more flexible in the language that it supports.
SakthivelVeeramuthu - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 11, 2024
Network Deployment is the most useful feature for scalability. It has many features within the standard WebSphere Application Server edition.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Red Hat, Apache and others in Application Server. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ME
Dec 18, 2017
Starting with version 8, WAS provides a special folder called monitor deployment. Once you put the .war or .ear file in there, it is deployed automatically without human intervention. This greatly helps us in our continuous integration server. Once the deployment binary is ready, we write a script to copy it to that folder and then, voila! The application is up and running and accessible from its context root.
Nicolae Chirea - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 12, 2022
What's most valuable in IBM WebSphere Application Server is its resilience. When you use the solution, you know that after the communication has been done, there will be no doubt that the data has reached its destination.
Saleem Shar - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 3, 2023
IBM WebSphere Application Server is one of the best servers due to its stability and paid license.
GE
Jan 12, 2020
The solution is robust. The connection management and the scalability, which IBM provides to the Stack, are also valuable.
it_user218334 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 24, 2017
IBM WAS is the backbone for our enterprise content management suite which delivers the primary processes for our customers. Without a good application server, it would be hard to provide a secure layer of midddleware upon which the other applications run. IBM WAS improves the stability of the entire solution and provides a high quality platform for running web-based solutions.
DP
Mar 2, 2022
The thing about WebSphere, as opposed to other ones that I am aware of such as JBoss and Liberty, is that WebSphere has the most comprehensive scaffolding available to it.
LV
Oct 10, 2022
The only reason why we're currently using WebSphere is that the integration of the authentication with Azure is very quick. WebSphere has something that can immediately connect with Azure Active Directory.
 

IBM WebSphere Application Server Cons review quotes

SR
Nov 19, 2020
Based on the field and based on the build that was provided, we've noticed a lot of constraints in terms of the performance now.
PO
Jul 6, 2021
The business logic side of it is sort of missing in the sense that if I want to track and measure velocity, it is not really available. You have to buy another application and embark on a separate implementation. Instead of having different licensing, IBM DataPower should be integrated with WebSphere. It will allow us to build the business layer and rules a lot more efficiently, rather than developing rules within the application. It would be good if we can set up the business layer through parametrization rather than development. IBM DataPower has the business rule and the controls, and if it can be integrated, it would be fantastic. It will help the application in working better in terms of security features and business logic. If you're going to use it for open banking, you will be able to monitor velocity on the total pricing.
SakthivelVeeramuthu - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 11, 2024
While WebSphere mostly supports IBM HTTP Server (IHS) as the web server plugin, I think it would be beneficial if it also supported Apache and NGINX web servers. That would give customers more flexibility in their choices.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Red Hat, Apache and others in Application Server. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ME
Dec 18, 2017
IBM needs to pay attention to market changes more quickly. We now have Java 9 and very soon Java EE8. We do not want to wait for two or three years after their release until they are supported by the new version.
Nicolae Chirea - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 12, 2022
What could be improved in IBM WebSphere Application Server is its interconnection with other products, for example, Kafka. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is a better graphical user interface.
Saleem Shar - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 3, 2023
The installation has room for improvement.
GE
Jan 12, 2020
They should make the solution more lightweight and not bundle everything into a single product.
it_user218334 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 24, 2017
Initial setup is very simple. Just use the IBM Installation Manager and add the packages. The install wizard takes care of the rest. The only thing that can be difficult is to find the right packages on the IBM website, because of all the changes that IBM does on its website(s).
DP
Mar 2, 2022
When we run into memory or locking issues, we resort to using third-party tools. However, it would be preferable to have native tools for debugging this type of problem.
LV
Oct 10, 2022
IBM WebSphere Application Server hasn't changed much. It's still a heavyweight for any company compared to what you get. Unless your code base is deeply linked with it, I don't think it's a great idea to go with this solution. The current trend is toward modularity and containerization, and given the product's requirements, containerization will be difficult. There is a memory requirement as well.