IBM WebSphere Message Broker Logo

IBM WebSphere Message Broker pros and cons

Vendor: IBM
3.9 out of 5
704 followers
Post review
 

IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pros review quotes

MM
Oct 8, 2020
Integration and mapping are easy, which is a major advantage.
Akash Dalebehera - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 13, 2023
The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is the ability to facilitate communication with legacy systems, offering a multitude of great capabilities. For example, if there is a mainframe system in place with a web service serving as the front end. In that case, the solution enables efficient protocol transformations to convert all request payloads into a format that the legacy systems can accept, rendering the integration and transformation processes seamless and highly effective.
SP
Oct 4, 2020
The solution has good integration.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AA
Oct 15, 2020
Performance-wise, this solution is really good.
MO
Sep 25, 2019
It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format.
Manjunath-V - PeerSpot reviewer
May 30, 2022
Message Broker is valuable because most of the applications are using MQ. Even in my current engagement, the few applications which I audit to onboard the bank are using MQ.
AR
Aug 9, 2020
We only use the basic features, but the most valuable one for us is the Publish-subscribe pattern.
Ajit Pillai - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2023
The documentation, performance, stability and scalability of the tool are valuable.
AD
Jun 1, 2023
It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy.
RA
Nov 6, 2021
Straightforward development and deployment.
 

IBM WebSphere Message Broker Cons review quotes

MM
Oct 8, 2020
Technical support is good but they could have a better response time.
Akash Dalebehera - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 13, 2023
I know that Message Broker was a very tightly copied product with another IBM product, that is, IBM MQ. I would like to have a little bit more decoupling from the IBM MQ because it should not be a prerequisite for IBM WebSphere Message Broker usage.
SP
Oct 4, 2020
The installation configuration is quite difficult.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AA
Oct 15, 2020
The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight.
MO
Sep 25, 2019
The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is.
Manjunath-V - PeerSpot reviewer
May 30, 2022
There is some lag in the GUI. There have been some performance issues and maybe it's because of the application data.
AR
Aug 9, 2020
Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved.
Ajit Pillai - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2023
It is currently a weighty product.
AD
Jun 1, 2023
Stability and pricing are areas with shortcomings that need improvement.
RA
Nov 6, 2021
Today I probably wouldn't go for Message Broker because of the cost structure, support, and the whole ecosystem around IBM.