Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We haven't had any stability issues. 

This is a stable solution. 

This product is quite stable. There are no issues within the application or with the tool itself becoming unstable.  

Stability of TWS is relatively good. Notably, most issues I’ve experienced personally have stemmed from distributed schedules, i.e., z-centric.

The project we worked on involved the running of nearly 24,000 job instances in a single day, so I would say that the solution is stable. 

None! It's indestructible, and if configured correctly, and easily recovered in a disaster scenario.

The system is remarkably stable on Unix/Linux/extended agents. There were some connection/configuration issues on the Windows machines.

No.

I have not encountered any stability issues at all. No other IT infrastructure @ our company has proven to be as stable as our TWS v8.5.1/8.6 network and all its components.

The stability is good. 

We never encountered any stability issues. If your TWS administrator is very good with TWS, then he/she should always keep your TWS landscape stable.

It's very, very stable. The support is quite good. I was totally astonished about the life cycle of this IBM product because a lot of colleagues told me that Control-M is the best scheduler but I have found that it's not true. IBM does a really good job with its product.

We have not have issues with stability.

None; overall the product is very stable, but can give you odd results if the environment is unstable (hardware\network issues). Once the environment issues are resolved and job scheduling has resumed, you might still experience strange behavior with dependency resolution and cyclic job functionality, which typically clears up with the next daily refresh.

It is very stable.

There were real stability issues. The WebSphere process gets hung on TWS masters running TWS 9.1. WebSphere is used heavily in our environment and a restart of WAS is really required at least once in a month.

We have not encountered any significant stability issues.

We had stability issues when managed by not enough skilled people.

I have not had any stability issues.

There were some stability issues with older versions we used. There have not been any on the current one (8.6.02) since we started using it, for ~3+ years.

There were some stability issues but we lit a fire under IBM's feet and they corrected them.

I did not encounter any stability issues. It’s been a very stable and reliable product.

This has been a dependable product for us.

I have not encountered any stability issues.