IBM XIV Other Solutions Considered

it_user523104 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Systems Programmer at Sharp

I didn't pick out XIV personally, but we looked at a bunch of different storage vendors. The technical people really wanted to go with IBM compared to the other vendors, mostly because we had already been familiar with it, but we did several in-house PoCs for other vendors too. The IBM just worked much better with the stuff we had. The GUI was much better. The CLI was better. For us, it was much better.

For our stuff, we looked at 3PAR, NetApp and EMC.

View full review »
Ajith Kandaramage - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Operation Engineer at HNB

We evaluated Hitachi, NetApps, and EMC, and based on the support levels and the price, we decided it was cheaper to go with IBM.

View full review »
it_user736191 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Storage Engineer with 10,001+ employees

I am not the direct customer. We can only recommend various solutions to the customer.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
VS
Systems Engineer II at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

No, as we were moving away from our old CX3 Clariion arrays.

View full review »
it_user649086 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

EMC VMAX 10K, 3PAR, DS.

View full review »
it_user735234 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Engineer V, Enterprise Storage Systems at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We were pretty tied to IBM, so only DS units. Lately, we have been considering the V-series units, as well.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.