IBM XIV Scalability
It gives you 325 TB usable per rack, so it's very scalable. Since we're using it behind the SVC, we could just bring in five more, if we had the money, and just completely scale it behind the SVC without any difficulty whatsoever.
View full review »IBM XIV's scalability is adequate for our requirements, but because it's modular, you can't scale to larger requirements.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
VS
SystemsE659e
Systems Engineer II at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Nope.
View full review »The active front-end ports are according to the ordered capacity, and new ports are activated when you order extra. The number of usable ports in a full capacity configuration (excluding for Remote mirroring) are so low compared to high-end storages. If I remember correctly, it was six modules of four ports, minus at least four for mirroring. The queue per port was 1400 (may have changed).
View full review »Historically, there has been no way to expand beyond the maximum provided in a single rack, so using SVC was required.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.