We have examined different vendor WAF solutions but this solution was unique.

For web application firewalls we are actually currently using more than one solution. We are using both Imperva and AWS. Which solution that we use depends upon the environment and depends on the situation. So we are using both solutions but for different situations when there is an advantage to using the capabilities of one product over the other.  

We used Akamai previously, but due to full PCI DSS compliance, we needed a proprietary solution for two-factor authentication. We then switched to Incapsula.

Compared with the competitors, the solution provides better security features, including web protection firewall and DDoS protection.

We had not used a WAF before deploying Incapsula.

I did not previously use a different solution.

We previously used Cloudflare. Although a very good solution, it forces users to completely give up the DNS management of their domain, which most enterprises don’t want to do. Incapsula only needs a redirection of the actual web entry.

We are using our own firewall with the web application services. We used our own firewall before implementing with Incapsula, but we are also implementing it now under Incapsula cloud solutions.

We did not use another Web Application Firewall before Imperva.

No, this is the first solution I have used.

We work with all of the Imperva solutions from the database, monitoring tools, and the web applications firewall.

We moved from CloudFlare because Incapsula’s minification was faultless, and their CNAME installation procedure avoided downtime for other services such as email.

Yes, we were using Barracuda Web App Firewall which we retired several years ago.

We went through at least a quarter million dollars in DDoS firewalls before we got to them. We tried solutions worldwide.

I didn’t use any other solution.

We did try CloudFlare, but the pricing didn't suit our use case too well.

Yes, we used Barracuda. The product was not difficult to configure but it didn’t work well. There was high latency in the product.

We previously used Akamai. Incapsula is much cheaper and the administration is much easier.

No previous solution used.

We did not use another similar solution prior to Imperva.

I did not previously use a different solution.

Prior to Incapsula, we only used inline IPS, anti-virus, etc. Incapsula is our first web application firewall.

We didn't previously work with a different solution. We've partnered with Imperva so we're dealing only with them.

We had used many local, and some cloud-based solutions (like Azure, Advanced Nagios, Centreon). We switched for the scalability of the solution, the reporting features it has, as well as the availability to fine tune the solution. 

No.

I was not involved with any solution in the company prior to Incapsula. When I came to this company, we were using this solution.

We did not previously use any other solutions.

No, as we are a fairly new project so we have no other experience with another solution. However, we did look at CloudFlare, Limelight, and CDN networks.

I had a gut feeling about the product right from the get-go.

No.

We were using Akamai and we switched to Incapsula mainly due to the WAF effectiveness and total cost.

We had a sysadmin but he was unable to keep up. No other parties were used.

We used a NetScaler mitigation appliance – nothing worked that well, we were getting attacks and they were taking down services.

We previously used Fortinet.

We did not previously use a different solution, but we researched other solutions. Incapsula was highly regarded and we were simply wowed.

No.

CloudFlare and I switched because we needed more locations.

We did not previously use a different solution.