Our in-house team was responsible for deployment. It was primarily me, and I'm a network engineer. We did have supporting people on-site because we have a physical implementation, although it was essentially a software switch that we turned on.

I actually did the integration.

Once we understood how the product worked, we relied on Infoblox to help us put together how we would implement this solution into our network.

The deployment was done in-house with Infobox.

From my perspective, I have two engineers dedicated to the implementation process. But the number of engineers required can vary. It depends on the complexity and size of the project. It could take longer if you have a larger team working on it.

When it comes to maintenance, from an advanced enterprise perspective, you would typically have an entire team dedicated to your security posture. So you would have a team behind the maintenance of the solution.

Its implementation was done by Infoblox professional services.

We deployed it with the help of a third-party consultant. We were very satisfied with their work. They had the knowledge to help us do a migration for a big-scale environment. While this was a third-party consultant, Infoblox was always reachable. Infoblox knew that we were doing this switch and support was informed. So, we could call Infoblox support and they immediately reacted. Everybody was fully available and aware of this major change for us.

We have a consultant to work on implementations, but I don't think he was involved in the upgrade because Infoblox told us that the upgrade needs to be done in-house. 

I performed the deployment.

One person is sufficient for deployment and maintenance.

We handled the implementation ourselves.

The implementation was done by the company itself.