Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Other Solutions Considered
BB
reviewer1629072
Senior Network Architect at a university with 10,001+ employees
We looked at BlueCat and Umbrella. We went with BloxOne because it integrates better with our system. The functionality also looked a little bit better than that of the other two products.
View full review »LL
Laura Ling
DNS Guru at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
We did not evaluate other options before selecting BloxOne.
View full review »EK
Eli Kirtz
Principal Engineer at T-Mobile
We have not evaluated other solutions. We would end up having to go to another company and replace everything. We didn't see that as being feasible.
We have been using Infoblox, as a whole, for over 20 years. When they add new things to their portfolio, because we are already standardized in Infoblox, it is easier for us just to evaluate what they are offering versus trying to start over again. Most are add-on things that can be added to our existing Infoblox.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Domain Name System (DNS) Security
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Infoblox, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks and others in Domain Name System (DNS) Security. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JB
Jared Baker
Virtualization/Datacenter Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
We wanted to go with BloxOne Threat Defense because it was a simple integration. Instead of an installation, it was just something that we turned on.
At this point, we haven't really utilized the integrations with security systems, such as vulnerability scanners, ITSM, SIEM/SOAR, NAC, and next-gen endpoint security. We don't use a lot of the vulnerability scanners because we have in-house products for that, like Carbon Black.
View full review »BD
reviewer1659537
Network Engineer at a recruiting/HR firm with 10,001+ employees
We've briefly looked at some of the solutions. It was integrated with our existing system, so it really didn't make sense to change.
We may look at alternatives in a few years, but it won't probably happen for two to three years at this point. We would like to keep an eye on what's out there. We have had some issues with not necessarily the support, but the customer service team from Infoblox has been frustrating to deal with a few times. So, we would like to keep our options open.
View full review »PS
reviewer1602792
IT Infrastructure Specialist Infrastructure Applications at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
We investigated two systems beside Microsoft and BlueCat.
BW
reviewer2034057
Security Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
My parent company and its subsidiaries were already on Infoblox, so we're an Infoblox family now.
View full review »One of the main differences between Infoblox and Cisco Umbrella is that Infoblox supports the DNS check completely, whereas Cisco Umbrella does not. You can also see the original client IP address and not just the outgoing IP address.
In terms of scalability, Infoblox is the better solution.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Domain Name System (DNS) Security
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Infoblox, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks and others in Domain Name System (DNS) Security. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.