Scalability was not-existent with this version of Infobright. It existed on one big database server, central-point-of-failure style. We ended up implementing our own sharding client to hash-shard our inbound data to multiple instances of Infobright.

There was no scalability at all. Infobright didn't permit any changes in tables.

It was very good for scalability, even with the limiting factor that it can only be on one machine.

No.

I have not encountered any issues with scalability.

We did not technically have any scalability issues.

There were no scalability issues. You need a very small footprint as well as very low HW requirements for the data size and load tasks.