It scales. Jamf's largest customers have fleets in the tens of thousands of devices.

Jamf Pro is a very scalable solution, and I rate its scalability a ten out of ten.

Scaling up or down is a breeze. Just add users/devices to the existing scope of workflows and apps and it does what you expect (remember to add licenses when scaling up).

It's absolutely scalable. We have a little over a hundred workstations, and then we have our devices, and then we also have other groups. We have the med center, and then we have other smaller groups on the university side that have their deployment. I'm not sure how many are in theirs, but they're a site. As far as the university goes, that's us, but then they have different sites where it trickles down to them for their deployments. I don't have numbers for them, but they're definitely smaller than what we have.

We also have a lot of iPads that we give out to our School of Medicine students and there are some other departments that get a bunch of iPads that are given out to the actual students. So, there are definitely over a thousand. That's just for us, but then there are other departments too, so it's a big number.

Jamf Pro is extremely scalable for any size needed. 

Scalability is great and works for large or small deployments.

The scalability is great. I would rate it 4.5 out of five. 

We have around 40,000 on the solution currently. Users are varied. It's everyone from the CEO and CIO to CEO normal users, salespersons, marketing persons, et cetera.

We do not plan to increase usage at this time. 

The scalability is easy. You just put more CPU and RAM into your VMs and you can scale up without touching the whole system.

It is easy to add licenses if need be. We have added many iOS devices over the years quite easily.

Jamf has come a very long way since I first started using it in 2016 and Apple has a lot to do with that. The Jamf community and Apple community have grown in the past 3 years and there's a reason for that - a lot more businesses are implementing Apple devices. 

The scalability is very good.

Jamf is extremely scalable. We have around 1400 total devices under management. Other companies have well over 100,000 devices.

Jamf Pro is currently managing approximately 1,400 devices for us.

It's highly scalable. You can have 10,000 clients.

It's used on a daily basis. We have 700 users on one and 1,500 users on the other. We also have about 200 users on another. There are about 3,000 machines.

If you are using the cloud service, then it would be extremely scalable. Larger on-prem installs may need to look at clustering servers for load balancing or software package storage.

We opted for the cloud version of this solution as it is scalable. We are currently supporting 1000 to 1500 devices and we will be scaling this to 6000 Mac devices.

Jamf Pro is a product that can be scaled. Scalability is something that must and should exist, and I always believe in possibilities.

At the moment, the way the product is designed for managing Apple devices meets my needs.

When I need to scale it in the future, I know it's a possibility.

Jamf Pro Cloud handles our device load without any issue.  We run approximately 250 iPads and 330 assorted Mac computers and laptops. With our combined device count, we're not taxing the system at all. From speaking with Jamf, we'd still be considered a smaller client, so to answer the question, I would recommend that potential clients contact Jamf for exact information, but it appears that they can scale from a small number of devices to several thousand with no issues. 

This product scales very well. There's a great use case from IBM that shows how they scaled in that environment. They bought 100,000 Macs and it scaled out very well. I've used it myself when I went from zero to over 600 computers in less than six months.

At this point, we're just implementing it with our clients. The Mac footprint is perhaps 500 end-users, total. We're planning to grow the environment and we're going to use Jamf to do it.

It was very easy to scale. We have about 970 odd devices. We have MacBooks and just over 600 iPads.

It scales well.

The product is very scalable! There are tons of API integration and add-ons. Also, Jamf has zero-day support and is always adding new things.

We use Jamf Pro's hosted services. Scalability has never come up and performance has always been top-notch.  The only slowness is when your internet is lacking.

Jamf Pro is definitely scalable. Companies can start out with three computers and go up to ten thousand if needed.

Jamf's scalability is good.

I think Jamf is definitely scalable. 

Jamf Pro is scalable. We have upwards of 50 customers, one of which has 200,000 users, and it's working, but our largest deployment is about 12,000 users. 

Jamf Pro is scalable.

It works well for small simple setups like ours but is robust enough for the large setups with experts of code behind them.

It is fully scalable and extremely simple. We scaled up from 600 to 1,200 devices over the summer and nothing changed. It was phenomenal.

On a previous project, we had about 75-80 people on the solution. On the current project the average amount of users will be 30-35. It's a bit of a smaller project.

I love the flexibility of platforms this can be installed on. It provides ease of upgrades and migration when necessary. 

This is a scalable solution. We have more than 2000 users.

We've had no issues with scalability. You go from a small number of devices to thousands of devices, and there's no change. There's no slowness or anything like that. It just continues to function.

We have about 700 iPhones, and about 250 to 300 MacBooks right now, and user roles range from developers to CEOs.

We will increase usage. We always have a desire to increase usage, however, we have a choice program in place for our users. Therefore, if a Windows person wants to switch, when their time is ready for a refresh, they can choose a Mac device.

I have found Yannick Jamf Pro to be scalable. I can work with a very small group of computers or I can update 500 of them in a few minutes.

We have approximately 500 people using the solution and they are mainly teachers.

I use it every day and I update the software once a week. Friday is a big day for me for the usage of the solution and for the rest of the time, it's only small maintenance or emergency operations that I use once in a while. Every day I check in if I've had issues or I check the logs for problems with deployments, and so on. I check it all the time, even when I'm not working, I check it on my phone. It's very convenient.

no comment on this.

This solution is easy to scale. We adopted this after not being able to scale Profile Manager.

My impressions of the scalability are good. 

Scalability is great. It has allowed us to grow while saving us time.

It is highly scalable.  

JAMF already offers a wide variety of tools for the IT industry. I work in K-12 and am excited to see what they will offer with the new acquisition of ZuluDesk.  

The solution is tremendously scalable.

I am super satisfied. We have an environment for around 30,000 Mac devices.

The solution will be able to continually grow as an organization grows. Initially, we started to use Jamf Pro when we only had about 200 Macs spread globally, and now we are managing 3000+ Apple devices with it.

It's a scalable product.

Jamf enrolled devices are approximately 1,000, for a project that we have started with recently.

I have customers that range in size from 25 customers to 25,000 customers, and it works same the same way, regardless. It is scalable.

It scales well, into the tens or hundreds of thousands of devices.

Scalability is great.

This product is very scalable. You can have tens of thousands of devices for it.

We did not encounter any issues with scalability.

It has scaled to more than twenty thousand devices with no signs of stopping.

Jamf is very scalable. If anything, it may be too scalable for an entry level technician. The ability to deploy to everyone is easy if the admin was careful to restrict abilities.

It is a cloud solution, so it works great for scaling. 

Scales well.  I have used it for 50 users up to 2000 without having to hire additional headcount.

The solution is very scalable. Most of the usage for this software is in education and in healthcare.

I believe that this is a scalable solution.

In terms of scalability, this is a very flexible product. You can easily up and downscale.