JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Previous Solutions

Sydney Chidambaram - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior JD Edwards Functional Consultant at Critical Data Management (Pty) Ltd

I used to use JD Edwards World. I stopped using it in 2015. Once Oracle took it over, the support stopped being very good. 

I'm also familiar with SAP.

View full review »
Ramandeep Walia - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivery Lead - IT Finance at Cargill

We also use JD Enterprise World. However, it is reaching its end-of-life. 

View full review »
Nitin Mothilall - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Business Analyst at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

I've worked on NetSuite, and I've worked on Oracle E-Business. This product is way ahead of its time in terms of features. It's just that it's a mid-tier product that's not recognized a lot. As compared to NetSuite and Oracle E-Business, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is highly customizable, especially in a manufacturing environment.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Khalid Jalal - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager - Group ICT at Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill Co. B. S. C. (c)

We used an internal system on the IBM platform before moving to JD Edwards Enterprise One 25 years ago. JD Edward Enterprise One has a lot of functionalities, but they are costly. So we have developed in-house systems to take care of them. For example, we have our time and attendance systems outside JD Edward Enterprise One. We also have our procurement, which liaises with our suppliers and vendors outside JD Edward Enterprise One because we cannot afford to manage everything from JD Edward Enterprise One. The fundamental functionalities are on the solution, but for any extra features and self-service workflow, we handle it outside of JD Edward Enterprise One.

View full review »
Raymond De Riel - PeerSpot reviewer
JD Edwards functional consultant manufacture at Ordina

At this moment, I'm on my second project for Oracle E-Business Suite and then the project module.

View full review »
AN
Project Leader at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I used a product from Oracle as a CRM tool, but I haven't used any other ERP. I've only been using JD Edwards.

View full review »
TT
Technical Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Our clients have used legacy systems, homegrown systems, and other ERP solutions.

View full review »
SG
Senior Project Manager at Clarisity Solution

In my previous organization, I used Tally. JD Edwards is a much more vast and better tool when compared to Tally. The best part about JD Edwards is that it is an integrated system. All the modules are interrelated. The transactions are interfaced with the finance system, which serves as a reporting mechanism.

If a client asks us to create a new report, our developer takes more time to create the report. If there were any tools available within JD Edwards, it could have helped the developer to code faster.

View full review »
Eric Oboh - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at Vertex Business Systems

I previously used SAP Business All-in-One but I prefer JD EdwardsOne. 

Our price range is very competitive, and JD EdwardsOne is easy to use. Additionally, the new user interface is user-friendly.

View full review »
RS
Global Oracle JDE Practice Head at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

I am an engineer for the last 18 years and I have not seen any other solution from the market that is better. I have seen some comparable solutions, that might be on par with the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. However, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is being rated as the tier one ERP in the industry for SMBs.

View full review »
NP
ERP Auditor at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

We have plans to move to another solution. 

View full review »
MV
Chief Financial and Operating Officer at Aicrem Square

I have a little bit of experience with similar products from several vendors, including Microsoft Dynamics and SAP. I have found that the user experience is much nicer within JD Edwards, compared to anything else that I have seen. It is not rigid and allows you to change or customize things within the framework that is provided.

NetSuite is a little bit cheaper than JD Edwards, although they are catering more to smaller enterprises rather than medium-sized organizations. They compromise certain functionality or applications. A lot of the applications out there are good for startups, but the moment that you start diversifying, you have to start looking either at add-ons or re-implementing different ERPs. The trend lately is not to just replace everything. Rather, have additional or complementary products that suit your needs

With JD Edwards, it is a fully integrated system so you can run just certain modules, but it's optimized if you use the full ERP system. For example, if you need procurement, work orders, and financials, then there is a benefit to moving everything into one system.

View full review »
it_user607824 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Architect at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We used to work with JDE World Software Version A7.3. We changed because the business required more advanced technology functions like mobility and financial reporting.

View full review »
PV
Project and Service delivery Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

I have previously used SAP.

View full review »
it_user436119 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT and Purchasing Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

We were previously using Microsoft Dynamics GP and it was not as robust. It was a great place to put data into but a little hard to get data out of. It's much easier to get data out with JD Edwards.

View full review »
BW
Lead of Business Intelligence at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

We have used this product for many years. I have not noticed much difference between version 9.1 and 9.2.

Quite some time ago, I worked with Oracle EBS and it is not as user-friendly as EnterpriseOne.

View full review »
it_user436035 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Analyst at a paper AND forest products with 501-1,000 employees

We were on an AS/400 system prior to this. Then the company that owned us at the time had to get off of that system and bring it on to a new system and they decided to go with JD Edwards.

View full review »
MP
CIO at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
it_user621828 - PeerSpot reviewer
JD Edward Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We did not previously use a different solution.

View full review »
SB
Project Manager - JD Edwards at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

As a consultant, I have been involved with many successful JD Edwards implementations. The changes were for the better.

View full review »
it_user607404 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Analyst at a manufacturing company

To be a great competitor, you need to be surrounded by the best employees, best products, best service and best technology and, from my point of view, Oracle is doing this very well.

View full review »
it_user585459 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Manager at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

I am a specialist and use an appropriate solution according to the needs of the business.

View full review »
it_user543966 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Information Systems

We were using something else. We switched to meet business demands.

View full review »
it_user683469 - PeerSpot reviewer
Functional Consultant & Advisor at a construction company with 5,001-10,000 employees
it_user616518 - PeerSpot reviewer
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Specialist at a non-tech company

Our company was using AS400 with OS400 with RPG programming. We switched to E8.11 due to limited technical support.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.