Jira Pricing

GH
Senior Principal Engineer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

For very small companies, if you have less than 10 individuals, it is $10 a year for each of the products. When we were a part of the enterprise and had more than 10 people using it, or before they came up with this solution for small companies, it was $2,500 a year for the license for Jira and Confluence, and I believe something like $600 a year to perpetuate the license. I can't remember if it was $600 or $2,500 annually. It was for up to 25 people at the time, and this was in the early 2000s and mid 2000s.

There are a number of add-on products that you can sync with Atlassian Jira. Confluence, FishEye, Crucible, and Bamboo are different Atlassian products, but then there are sub-products. They have what's called Atlassian marketplace, and you can buy products for certain needs. Tempo is a perfect product for doing time management and timesheets. It was also $10. So, you have a bunch of different types of add-on products that different individuals have built that work well with the tool, and they are quite stable.

View full review »
RC
Product Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Pricing information you can just get right off the internet. Atlassian is notorious for not negotiating. They have never negotiated up until very recently. They've started to negotiate contracts as they're really trying to push the cloud. They're trying to get people to move to the cloud. In some cases, they are willing to negotiate costs if you're willing to move to the cloud. Not only costs. Terms. They treat everybody equally, which honestly, I respect.

However, large enterprise organizations like the one I work for, hate it. They hate that as they feel like they have some sort of clout or they need to be able to throw their weight around a little bit and they needed to be treated specially. One of the biggest things that hurt Atlassian is its unwillingness to work directly with large enterprise organizations. It works well with smaller companies, however, their approach to large enterprise organizations really hurts them. The Microsofts of the world will send you a whole crew of people that will come in and do demos and meet with your senior executives. Atlassian has that in the equivalent of a TAM, technical account manager. 99% of the time if you call Atlassian, they'll say, "Whoa. You work with one of our third-party vendors." Which, okay, there's a ton of third-party vendors that are fantastic I'm sure, however, people want to see Atlassian. When you get into a larger enterprise organization, they don't appreciate the fact that an Atlassian representative can't come in and take the time to meet with people and do these things when they're spending that kind of money. It doesn't bode well. They really don't like it.

That's largely why they're being pushed out of Jira and onto other solutions. Microsoft, for example, has invested time and energy. Microsoft has also negotiated terms and pricing. Large companies would rather have a relationship with a company like that than a company that doesn't negotiate or come to see you.

View full review »
NeillWalker - PeerSpot reviewer
Agile Consultant at MSOLdigi

I use a monthly subscription. We can opt for an annual subscription if we go through a reseller.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Jira
March 2024
Free Report: Jira Reviews and More
Learn what your peers think about Jira. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Mitch Tolson - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Robotics at Fresh Consulting

The cost is about $10 per user, per month. 

There is a perception with Jira that they try to nickel and dime you quite a bit.

For example, they'll often say "Oh, you want this little feature? We'll charge you $3 per month per user." Whoever's signed up to your account they will charge you, even though you might only need five people to sue it from a 150 person team. That's excessive.

Compare that to Azure DevOps where withAzure DevOps, you just pay $20, and then you deploy that extension to your instance or tenant. With Jira, they charge you a dollar or $2 per active account in your tendency even if not everyone in my tenancy needs to have that extra feature set.

View full review »
StuartBarker - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at Corecom Quality Engineering

The licensing cost for Jira is typically around seven dollars per user, though it may vary depending on regional variations. This cost is for a subscription-based model rather than a one-time purchase. I rate its pricing a seven out of ten. 

View full review »
Osama Shatarah - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Owner at Algoriza

Jira is expensive.

View full review »
Gorazd Hribar Rajteric - PeerSpot reviewer
OSS Expert & Team Lead at Telekom Slovenije

I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. The tool is expensive.

View full review »
JD
IT Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

The ballpark figure is about $100 a month.

View full review »
Nalin Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Quality Assurance Group Lead at Samsung

Compared to the value Jira provides, it’s not that expensive. It has an yearly licensing cost.

View full review »
AQ
Programme Manager - Major Programmes Office at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

We pay a yearly licensing fee for an enterprise-level license. 

It's quite similar to the pricing that they have on their website. It's quite transparent from their site. They have a package that charges per user, however, they have some scalable packages, for zero to 10 users, from 10 to 20, from 20 to 50, and so on. You can choose, depending on the size of your company or the number of users. The costs are quite transparent.

While everything is included in that package, the integration or the customization is a different fee. There's a project apart from the integrator, which may vary in cost.

View full review »
PV
Senior Technical Manager at PurpleSlate

It's not very cheap. It's also not very costly. I'd rate it a five out of ten in terms of pricing.

View full review »
YL
Information Technology Program Manager at Reframe Solutions

Jira has a two-tier pricing system; a basic level and a premium level, which I think could be broken down a little more, but the pricing and billing are reasonable. You can add or remove users and they bill you dynamically month to month based on the number of users. It would be nice to have tiered pricing based on user numbers because, for large companies with hundreds of users, it's going to become expensive really quickly. It's acceptable for us and we have what we need.

View full review »
Krishnanunni M - PeerSpot reviewer
Dev Ops Engineer at a wellness & fitness company with 201-500 employees

The product is moderate and has a yearly subscription.

I rate the product's pricing a five or six out of ten.

View full review »
EJ
IT bp at KDR Corp

If I compare Jira's licensing model with that of other products, I think that the other products have a much better licensing model. Considering what is happening in the market presently, and as people are moving away from Jira and ServiceNow, more and more people have started embracing cheaper products in the market. I rate the product's price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

It is important to know that my company uses the free version of the solution since we are not a big organization. My company is currently looking into the configurations and other areas before going for the paid version of the solution.

View full review »
Cemil Uzun - PeerSpot reviewer
General Manager at WTECHIN

The standard package of Jira is for 100 users. They should offer more packages for other increments, such as 500 or 2,000. In my previous company, there was a free package that provided a minimal number of users.

View full review »
Styliana Araouzou - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Operations Analyst at Etoro

While there is a cost associated with the solution, and licensing needed, it's not an aspect I deal with directly. 

View full review »
PS
Agile Coach at Dr. Agile

I don't deal with licensing in my current consultant position.

View full review »
PM
Software Test Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

I don't have any details in relation to costs or licensing arrangements. 

View full review »
WE
Product Group Lead Warehousing Solutions at Kühne + Nagel (AG & Co.) KG

To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money.

View full review »
it_user446067 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director Business Change and Quality Assurance at Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island

Look to their cloud offering first; get using it quickly. Be wary of some of the add-ons, as there are cost components to them; if you need them, add them in.

View full review »
MS
Project manager

There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. The product offers flexibility in pricing since it depends on the memory bits you have used.

View full review »
HN
Head Section Mobile Developer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

The tool's pricing is reasonable. 

View full review »
KS
Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

I'm not aware of the pricing or costs. It's not an aspect of the solution I deal with directly.

I am aware, however, there is a bit of a cost to do the online training.

View full review »
KS
Founder at OnlyAI

We are using for free version. The pricing is very cheap and has a very nominal fee.

View full review »
JananiLiyanage - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Agile Coach at Agility Tune Up

The license is yearly. It is a large, long-running program.

View full review »
AK
Project Manager at Duck Creek Technologies

JIRA's pricing is very economical. I would say that JIRA is a great deal more economical than Microsoft. So pricing-wise, JIRA is also good.

View full review »
DM
Consultant at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Jira and its solution off the shelf are cheap. It is cheap for startups.

View full review »
DM
Chief Architect / Owner at a security firm with 1-10 employees

For a small business, this quality of a product for the price is really nice. I think we're paying $78 a month or something like that right now.

View full review »
SP
Principal Project Manager at Systems Limited

Jira is expensive and a lot of people are choosing DevOps because they are cheaper, open-source, easy to use, and have basic licenses. Jira should decrease its price to be more competitive.

View full review »
VN
Senior PM / Scrum Master at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

I am not sure about the pricing, but I know its licensing is on a yearly basis.

View full review »
MB
Global Client Support Operations Manager at kyriba

I don't handle the finance side of our relationship with Jira.

View full review »
RO
Managing Partner at Wingspan Consulting

I don't have the number, but I sure wish Jira was less expensive. Its price point should be a little lower, and it should be more flexible for users who are just ticket viewers.

View full review »
KP
Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I'm not involved in the licensing aspect. 

View full review »
AP
Sr. Manager (TCoE) - ALM Platforms & PO &T IT at a pharma/biotech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

I am not in a position to comment on the licensing. 

View full review »
DB
Senior Scrum Master at MobilFlex

I don't have an opinion on the pricing or licensing. It's not really a main concern of mine. I don't have access to any information about what the company pays.

View full review »
MM
Partner at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees

It is very cheap if you forego the local instance and stick to the cloud.

View full review »
Yogesh Kapse - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Sales Manager at ESDS Software Solution Pvt Ltd.

The price is quite competitive. I rate the pricing a seven to eight out of ten.

View full review »
BR
Lead, Tools implementation & Project Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

The license model which we were on was a perpetual license model, which is the server edition of Jira, but that is being discontinued by Atlassian, which I can understand from their standpoint (in order to better compete). The server model means that we buy the license and we do not pay anything for the licensing part year-on-year. It means it's a lifetime license, but we do pay 50% of the license fee for the maintenance with the server. That is the recurring cost for us.

When we go into the data center model, which is the only on-premises model that we have, and the cloud offering from Jira, Jira Cloud, then you can see that both of them are subscription-based models. Data center is a yearly license, and as for the cloud, you can either pay monthly or yearly, depending on your requirements.

But this kind of licensing structure is actually a little heavy on the organization when it comes to the budget, I would say. The licensing which we had was a perpetual license with a year-on-year maintenance charge which we had to pay, which was half of the licensing fee.

View full review »
MA
Senior Architect at Second Step

I can't speak to the licensing costs. It's not an aspect of the solution I handle directly.

View full review »
KH
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

I don't deal with the money side of things. I just specify the requirements and the company handles everything. We are using it for many tasks so it seems like the price is reasonable. 

View full review »
VK
Agile and DevOps Coach at Infosys

The pricing for Jira is reasonable, although I think they can bring it down because the plugins cost extra. Jira Align, for example, is available at an additional charge.

Jira should understand that there are now competitors in the market, and they should lower their prices to expand the user base. As sales volumes increase, the price should naturally be brought down. In this case, people are more likely to retain their licenses instead of switching to a more cost-effective solution.

View full review »
JP
Director Of Technical Project Management at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

It depends on the type of license. In terms of subscription, it is cheap, and it works pretty well.

View full review »
Khalid Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Program Architect at Afiniti.com

The licensing model for enterprise users is costly. We have more than 2000 users and it is becoming expensive to use.

View full review »
MF
Business developer at Bat.IT

Pricing of licensing is too high.

View full review »
Naresh Rayakwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead architect at Tech Mahindra Limited

We don't pay for licensing because we are using the Open Source version. 

View full review »
TI
Co-Practice Head, Digital Transformation - RPA Solution Architect at Royal Cyber Inc.

I think the starter pack of three users, up to five users, is free. So you can try it out.

View full review »
GK
Project Manager at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

I am not in a position to comment on licensing costs. 

View full review »
AS
Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The pricing is fair. Right now, I'm using the solution for my small projects. For example, I'm using the Jira Cloud and Confluence Cloud, which are pretty nice. For small teams, it's a very, very interesting option.

View full review »
it_user678153 - PeerSpot reviewer
Agile Coach & Sr. Project Manager at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

The licensing model is annoying. They nickel and dime you.

View full review »
it_user149535 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees
Our original cost was about $2000 for our licenses and hosting costs to get started. We are currently paying about $6000 dollars per year for our current installation. View full review »
Hema Patil - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Affiliate at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We pay for a yearly license. 

View full review »
MR
Product Owner at Day Insurance

We make use of the solution free of charge. 

View full review »
RP
Director at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

I don't know what the licensing costs are but we find them affordable. It's never been a major issue.

View full review »
AD
Technical Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We have an enterprise license that includes cloud service and support.

View full review »
BC
Director at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

For up to 10 users, the solution is free but above that there are licensing costs.

View full review »
it_user147549 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Including all plugins in my last job, ~$15,000 and $7,000 annually thereafter. That was very plugin-centric, however, due to the complexities and user interface solutions I implemented. Other deployments have been less expensive.

View full review »
Sweta Purvey - PeerSpot reviewer
Python Developer at Crosslynx

It is an affordable tool.

View full review »
KS
Automation Architect at Micro Focus

We used to be on a perpetual license provided by our clients.

View full review »
AA
Owner at TRS

We are a regional research and education institute. We're using the free license provided for educational institutes.

View full review »
KK
IT specialist at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

The price of the solution could be lower.

View full review »
SM
Test Manager /Architect @ Testing Practice at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

As a company, we get a subsidized price, and it's lower than what's quoted on their website.

View full review »
DM
Agile CSM - Sr. Scrum Master at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I am not involved in the pricing. We have a sales team to procure our licenses.

I don't feel that price is an issue.

View full review »
MV
Head of QA Testing Services at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

There is an annual subscription to use Jira.

View full review »
DD
Senior DevOps/Build Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

There are other solutions that are free making this solution seem expensive in comparison.

View full review »
GT
Managing Director at Nevigate Communications (S) Pte Ltd

Right now the price is fair but once they move to the cloud, that model may not be attractive anymore.

View full review »
SS
Pre-Sales Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

I understand JIRA is quite expensive.

View full review »
DB
Project Manager at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees


View full review »
Radek Zajicek - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead at a printing company with 1-10 employees

It is subscription-based, and we probably pay yearly. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of price.

View full review »
LC
Consultor Funcional SAP at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

I don't have any information in regards to the licensing or cost of the solution. It's not an aspect of Jira I handle. 

View full review »
JR
Team Lead - Web Services at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

This product's cost is much higher compared to other platforms, but it's worth the extra cost. Some add-ons are only available at additional cost.

View full review »
MP
Middle Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

The basic price of Jira is reasonable, but for each plugin, we have to keep paying more. When you add it all up, it can be expensive. The main problem we face is we are forced to purchases plugin licenses for users who are not going to use them. For example, we have Jira licenses for approximately 450 people but if we only want a purchase a plugin for few people it is mandatory to buy the license for the 450 people who have Jira licensees. This is a problem because sometimes we need plugins for the product manager or for people in charge of the report, not everyone. For us, it can be very expensive in the end, they should alter this policy to allow plugins for only a set number of licenses.

View full review »
OS
Product Owner at mega trust

I don't deal with pricing, billing, or licensing. I can't speak to the exact cost of the solution. 

We likely pay a licensing fee as we have more than ten people using the solution, however, I can't say what the exact cost is. 

View full review »
KV
SENIOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPER at Matrix Comsec Pvt. Ltd.

The pricing is much higher than other similar solutions available in the market, and as such, the vendor should think about a price reduction to make this product more affordable.

View full review »
HB
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

There is an annual subscription fee based on the number of users. You can get a subscription for just 10 users, for small teams, and if you want more you can buy more. They have a standard and premium license. 

View full review »
MH
Partner at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

I can't speak to how much a license costs or the process behind setting one up and renewing it. I just use the solution. I don't handle sales or billing.

View full review »
it_user147543 - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

10 years ago 2K initially and 1K for additional plugins. recently 10K for the Atlassian Suite and additional plugins.

View full review »
it_user229578 - PeerSpot reviewer
COO with 51-200 employees

While Atlassian and TFS seem to be more of the toolsets that companies are adopting, and they are great core ALM stacks to build upon, you are still going to need tools from other vendors for most environments. For instance, you have more strenuous support desk needs, there is ServiceNow. If you make cars, boats, aeroplanes, trains, etc., you will most likely need IBM Rational DOORS. High end testing is still the domain of HP ALM/QC. Aerospace higher-end agile planning, you could look at JIRA Agile or VersionOne, or Rally. Embedded C, etc.

To summarize, MS TFS and/or Atlassian (maker of JIRA) are good core ALM stacks to run your shop on. The remaining issues are generally around how to integrate other systems to TFS or Atlassian, and also, how to migrate to TFS/Atlassian.

View full review »
HeshamFouad - PeerSpot reviewer
Quality and Technical Support Department Manager at dsquares

The licensing is per unit. My understanding is that it is pretty affordable. However, I don't directly deal with licensing.

View full review »
NB
Software Architect at AIOPS group

It is certainly a long-term solution for our company and for previous companies that I have worked for. They have these long-term term licenses, but I'm not sure if they really pay on a yearly basis. They are certainly using it for a really long period and for a lot of users.

View full review »
JS
ITBridging the gap between business and IT at a engineering company with 5,001-10,000 employees

The price at the moment for Jira is okay. I'm absolutely not amused with the plans to try to drive us to the cloud or to other licensing models. For the very simple reason that we are a company in the defense sector where cloud is problematic in a number of the domains. We are now approximately 60 users and the new policy will actually confront us with an upscale to approximately 500 users. I find it unacceptable, and may potentially lead us to look for another solution.

They need to think about industries, which are for compliance reasons are not capable of moving to the cloud, and that they don't put a knife on our throats with excessive prices.

View full review »
GM
Quality manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Jira is raising their prices for the license, which is like a trap because many other providers offer services like Jira but for much cheaper. And now they are making us move to the cloud. They gave us a deadline to migrate from the on-premise Jira Service Desk to the cloud. It's been two years since we started using it, so I think we will get a discount.

View full review »
LX
IT Business Analyst at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We are using the Community license for Jira since we are a not-for-profit organization.

View full review »
PH
Deputy Director - Network/Systems and Support - IT department (USJ) at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

There are no additional costs to the standard licensing.

View full review »
FK
Executive Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We had a perpetual license but have changed to a subscription.

We are not satisfied with the pricing. It has become more expensive.

We would prefer it to be cheaper.

View full review »
DK
IT Service Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

If you are using just Jira, it is cheap, but if you start to use it and you feel you need some more services or more functions, then you have to buy add-ons, which can make it expensive.

View full review »
RH
Service Delivery Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

The solution is quite expensive. I'm not sure of the exact pricing, however, I know it's not cheap.

View full review »
it_user150906 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of IT Department at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
My first setup was just for 10 users with a license of $10. View full review »
CC
Head of .NET Department at Evozon

I don't know the price of all the setups. Our clients pay for the setup, so our Jira users are covered by them. Of course, the price could always be cheaper.

View full review »
DM
Works at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

We have a corporate license, and it is probably based on the number of people.

View full review »
ME
Senior VP at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

The pricing so far has been okay. I don't have much to comment on.

View full review »
BK
Software Development Manager at System Optima

Its price is good and similar to other products. It is about five or six dollars per user.

View full review »
HC
Senior Software Engineer at Datta Tech Consulting

Start with requirement. If requirement requires tight security and confidentiality, it is highly recommended to employ expert assistance. Whereas if the requirement is agile in nature and is at very initial stages, it is best to start leveraging open source to some extent.

View full review »
Ananthi Nachimuthu - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technical Writer at Skava

We feel that the product is a good value for the cost. 

View full review »
TheJ Srinivasan - PeerSpot reviewer
President/CEO at FACTRSYSTEMS, LLC.

The price of Jira could be lower.

View full review »
it_user302112 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant IT Infrastructure at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Since JIRA gets really expensive when having a lot of users (and maybe plugins), you should try to avoid letting everyone in by default. Maybe it is better to only give those users access who really could benefit from this product.

View full review »
SC
Lead Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

The licensing costs are reasonable. 

View full review »
GC
Technical Director

Jira pricing is very difficult to pin down. They stopped another licensing version earlier in the year, in February. Now they have only data center licenses and then cloud licenses. These are more expensive than a server license. With a server license, you pay once. When you get a cloud license, it's an ongoing annual cost. We would have preferred if the old licensing model was kept.

View full review »
EJ
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

It is very affordable at the entry-level. When you get larger, the pricing becomes very, very steep. It is the same for many other solutions, but I find it expensive when you get larger.

View full review »
JA
Manager at M2C

It is not too expensive. It is just comparative to other tools like Microsoft Teams.

View full review »
NB
Business Analyst at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I don't deal with the financial aspect of the product. I cannot comment on if it is overly expensive or not as I don't handle billing or payments.

View full review »
CO
Senior Quality Assurance at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use. There is a base cost and then as you include other items, the cost rises. Our last payment was perhaps $1600, which includes both user licenses and add-ons.

There are no additional costs beyond the licensing fees, and it covers support.

View full review »
it_user147237 - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Development Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
I believe this goes together with my earlier comments. The day to day cost of using JIRA is minimal, since each team member shares the responsibility of keeping issues up to date so that the overall status is in sync with the real project status. There are also the occasional changes to JIRA board, issue or dashboards configuration driven by the evolution of team processes, which is a normal consequence of being an Agile team. View full review »
JG
Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software. 

View full review »
AS
Software Developer at DataStax

It should be very clear about the plan that you want to implement and what number of users will use it. In this way, you will pay for what you really need and will cover your needs since this software is based on the number of users implementing the same plan.

View full review »
it_user158856 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Project Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

I don’t recall the original start up cost. The initial license fee was considerably lower than it is today, and had no limits on the number of users. Today, apart from the general costs of maintaining the server, we have the annual license renewal fee.

View full review »
it_user150291 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Executive, IT Developer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees
Time spent setting things up. Perhaps one or two hours a week on average for one developer. View full review »
it_user136773 - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech Lead at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

When we used it, it was a low-cost solution but now the costs have increased. The team has to look into long term costs.

View full review »
DL
CEO and Founder at a computer software company with 1-10 employees

We are on an annual license and could be less expensive.

View full review »
JM
Cloud Global Director at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

While, of course, in general, we always want the pricing to be lower, it's pretty reasonable. The costs aren't too bad.

View full review »
WC
Lecturer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

I use the free version of the solution. We don't pay for it at all. 

View full review »
it_user159375 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Program Manager at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Pricing is based on the number of users. Cloud is cheaper, but choose in-house (server) version if you can, as it has more features and is more secure; overall very affordable.

View full review »
it_user265974 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees

JIRA's pricing and licensing is the best in the market with the features a user gets.

View full review »
MC
Line Technical Agent at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Its price is fine, but we would like it to be less expensive. We are paying on a yearly basis.

View full review »
KB
Konsulent at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The price of Jira is reasonable.

View full review »
MG
Partner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

One of my customers told me that they were receiving better pricing for a similar tool from Microsoft. Specifically, the total cost of ownership was cheaper with Microsoft.

View full review »
it_user855996 - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

It does not cost that much.

View full review »
SI
Solution Architect - Tech Division at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

The price of the solution could be less expensive. We pay annually for the solution.

View full review »
KY
Chief information technology officer at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

We currently have ten users, and it is free for ten users. However, we hope to increase usage.

View full review »
HG
Technical Content Writer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

We pay an annual licensing fee. 

View full review »
KP
Digital Test Lead at a comms service provider with 1-10 employees

In comparison to other solutions on the market, it is cost-effective. 

View full review »
it_user661125 - PeerSpot reviewer
UX Architect at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Its very nominal  prices per the features available.

View full review »
AI
Agile Software Architect at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The cost of Jira is okay. It's better than Azure DevOps. We don't have any licensing fees that I know of.

View full review »
UK
Microfocus Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

We've found the pricing to be quite good. It's not overly expensive. It's very reasonable and affordable for companies to implement.

View full review »
it_user461610 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical QA Lead in HPE NGA Synchronizer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Not my area of responsibility.

View full review »
KB
CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

There is a monthly license required for this solution and it is expensive.

View full review »
PV
Software Testing Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

We are on an annual license to use Jira.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Jira
March 2024
Free Report: Jira Reviews and More
Learn what your peers think about Jira. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Jira Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2024
DOWNLOAD NOW
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Jira Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Jira
March 2024
DOWNLOAD NOW
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions: