I evaluated Cisco ACI and DNA.

I also evaluated Arista, but a certain company didn't want to go with it because they didn't have the budget. Arista isn't cost effective because it's very expensive.

We are doing a POC with different vendors to replace this solution. We are looking at Cisco, maybe HP, and maybe another brand. 

We are looking for a chassis-based modular switch that can handle ten gigs, one gig, and both the copper and SSP modules. There will be six to ten modules in it.

Our partnerships are carefully evaluated, the solutions were evaluated for their technical, commercial and innovative capabilities

We evaluated other options including some by Cisco and HP. 

Because of some limitations as in regulations or client business requirements, we can not always work with cloud solutions or solutions that run on VMs. There are some solutions I might like to consider, but for the most part, our market will not accept certain solutions. Often we have to work with on-premises hardware and that makes a difference in availability.  

We are continuing to evaluate other solutions in order to be able to meet our clients' needs. The regulations and perception of products may change over time. We use Juniper in our company because we think it is the better solution and we do not have restrictions.  

We use Cisco at one of the locations. Juniper is stable comparatively. It has the best hardware built quality.

We chose Juniper Ethernet Switches over D-Link or others because it provides a higher connectivity speed, such as VLANs.

I've also looked into Cisco solutions.

We had an open bid process. We evaluated Cisco, Extreme Networks, Brocade, and Juniper.

We are evaluating Cisco and Aruba products.

We were evaluating Cisco, HPE, and Juniper. The cost was a big factor in our decision to go with Juniper.

We currently have an EX 2200 but we want to upgrade to an EX 4300.

We evaluated Brocade.