Juniper vSRX Previous Solutions
OB
Oscar Bashford
Network Operations Support at EOS IT Management Solutions Ltd
I'm kind of familiar with ASA firewalls from Cisco. I've worked with SonicWall a lot and Pablo Alto a little bit, however, I'm not 100% familiar with it. I've worked on it, but not every day. For Palo Alto, I just worked on it once. I know the interface. I know some other firewalls as well, however, I don't think they need to be mentioned, as they're not that popular. ASA firewall, I would say, is the most popular one.
View full review »We use Check Point. Both Juniper and Check Point have similar operational concepts. However, one notable difference is that Check Point provides separate management for the service.
View full review »RL
Richard A. LaJambe
Senior Network Administrator at Zetec, Inc.
We were using Cisco ASA before Juniper vSRX.
The reason that we didn't go with Cisco is that their products were behind the times. Other products had more up-to-date technology.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper, Microsoft, Netgate and others in Firewalls. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Fortinet is better than Juniper vSRX because they have an effective price. In addition, if you check the public feedback for Fortinet is around 9.0 and is highly recommended.
View full review »Compared with the solution, Cisco ASA needs proper SNMP and MIB monitoring in case of IPSec VPN tunnel downtime.
View full review »AG
Ahmad Ghalaini
Cisco Systems at Omnia International
We chose Juniper vSRX for its price.
View full review »I also use Cisco and Palo Alto.
View full review »PK
reviewer1268370
Senior Network Planning Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Before we started using Juniper, we used Huawei Firewall and its related services. We switched as we found that Juniper offered a much better service. From our perspective, everything about Juniper is better. Huawei is lacking in a few areas.
View full review »SH
Samer Hamadeh
Senior Information Security Engineer at SOCIALEYEZ
We previously used Cisco.
View full review »This solution was in place when I started so I cannot answer this question.
View full review »AH
reviewer900294
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We have used both Cisco and Juniper products. When comparing them, there are differences with the command line interface. Cisco is more advanced.
View full review »AH
reviewer900294
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We also used Cisco. There are some differences in the command-line interface.
View full review »SM
reviewer979824
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We did not use another solution prior to this one. A product did not exist for our customers' ships, so we introduced it using the vSRX.
View full review »PP
Technica4fc2
Technical Product Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Juniper vSRX was a replacement product for something called Network Connect that we were using before. It seems much easier for the clients to log into it.
View full review »JJ
reviewer1011693
Expert - architect of ICT systems at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
We used Fortinet firewalls as well as Juniper vSRX. We did not use them to the extent that we have used Juniper vSRX.
View full review »SV
Enginet677
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We used Palo Alto, Fortinet and One IP. Our main focus is on Juniper material.
Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper, Microsoft, Netgate and others in Firewalls. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.