We evaluated a few similar products. We decided to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business as it is more stable, has different defense models, and helps in efficient network supervision.

I have also worked with Checkpoint Harmony which is good if you're in the enterprise segment. It gives a complete overview of what is happening in your organization, providing detailed information.

I have evaluated Carbon Black and SentinelOne.

In the past, we've looked at ESET Endpoint Security.

We also evaluated Rapid7's AppSpider product, which is an application vulnerability scanning solution. We had done the POC, but we had issues with the licensing model, so we dropped it. 

I evaluated other options like McAfee, Sophos, Symantec Endpoint, and FortiClient, but they weren’t good enough for me.

We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint for Business Advanced. We are making a switch over to Sophos Intercept Advanced.

The remote management and new client process, plus the support, led us to Kaspersky. We are very satisfied with Kaspersky products.

In the latest tests, there were some issues there. We had decided to go with Kasperksy, but we reevaluated McAfee, Symantec, and other solutions. In the end, we chose Kasperksy.

When comparing this solution to others, such as Alpha Security & Antivirus, it is more compact and the firewall is better.

Yes, we have tried TrendMicro, Sophos and Mcafee.

We switched to Kaspersky because we had issues with other solutions. There were performance issues amongst other things. We switched to Kaspersky because we researched other opinions. 

Because of our security information, it is a good idea not to have a single endpoint protection solution for a long time. It is good to change the endpoint solution, after three or four years, for example. There should be a change in the endpoint solution because, let's say, most vendors are good at forensics. They also have a forensic ability. Some of them are very good at addressing malware protection, but not forensics. Kaspersky can do both.

We are currently looking for an alternative solution and have evaluated Microsoft Defender.

We evaluated two or three vendors before choosing Kaspersky. We chose Kaspersky because of the impact of endpoint machines. Usually, endpoint security software hurts the speed of the user's system while running scans but Kaspersky does not. Another reason we went with Kaspersky is because of the cost. 

While I would recommend Kaspersky, I am now looking for a more complete solution as my business grows. I am looking for something that gives me the protection I need and an entire view of our network. I am currently looking at Trend Micro and Carbon Black.

When choosing a product, we review product functionality, financial concerns and effective deployment. We looked at McAfee and others.

I didn't evaluate other options before choosing this product.

Not really, I only looked at the default antivirus that is installed in Windows.

We have been evaluating other solutions to change in the near future.

At the moment, we don't have any alternatives that we are considering.

Not applicable.

We've been looking at similar solutions, such as CrowdStrike, as a next-generation antivirus or anti-malware.

We evaluate NOD32, Symantec, and McAfee along with this product.

Trend Micro, McAfee, and Sophos.