Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pros and Cons
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pros
The advice I would give someone implementing this solution is that the management of the solution is very easy. You don't need a lot of people to manage the solution.View full review »
Deployment and centralized management are essential for us because of the number of loads that we have along with the number of geographic locations where we are based.
It has improved our performance and deployment.View full review »
We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end-users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most appropriate in terms of endpoint security and the speed of the user machine. The encryption is a major factor from our end.View full review »
We have gained advanced threat protection without investing more into that area.View full review »
The centralized management is a nice features. It gives us the leeway to deal with other things as protection is being carried on in the background. We do not have to keep on watching as long as we have the right updates. It also saves us time.View full review »
The signature update is done securely.View full review »
It is very efficient. I like its simplicity.View full review »
Antivirus, including anti-spam, trojan, and worm detection and prevention. Kaspersky has a comprehensive virus definition update which is very helpful for threat prevention.View full review »
We swtiched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements.View full review »
It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great.View full review »
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cons
This solution needs improvement in the reporting section. Reporting in Kaspersky Endpoint is good but it's not that great. The platform needs to centralize reporting control.View full review »
I would like to see machine learning and AI as added features.
There are some features built into Kaspersky that do not work at all, so we have to use other products instead.View full review »
There should be some AI involved. We already have machine learning involved in recent releases but machine learning should be more enhanced in the upcoming versions.View full review »
It's does not have the architecture or structure to scale up.
I would like to have more forensic features. For example, if we are hit by an attack, I would like to have tools to investigate what kind of attack, who has attacked, how it was attacked, and what we could do to stop this kind of attack in the future. I would like to have more forensics capability built into Kaspersky.View full review »
If someone has the older version of the solution, and wants to install a newer version, they must remove all of the previous applications. Otherwise, there will be issues with the solution.View full review »
There have been some performance issues. They provide good security, but this slows down the performance of machines' servers. The software is not updating as frequently as we need.View full review »
We would like to know where attacks are coming from.
It is hard to maintain the software and upgrade.View full review »
The need to re-engineer the source code to reduce CPU and memory usage. Other areas for improvement include a data-loss prevention solution, enhanced application control, enhanced device control, an endpoint encryption solution, an advanced persistent threats (APT) solution, and an all-in-one solution with one pricing scheme for corporate and enterprise business needs.View full review »
I think it would be good for them to consider and cloud integration capabilities.View full review »
The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface.View full review »