The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

The significance varies, and it is usually linked to the code's length. I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution. It offers comprehensive information, covering not only the basics but also delving into controllers, interfaces, and more.

I like that I can scan the code locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the Cloud. Actually Kiuwan allows to scan code both locally and in the cloud, but It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally.

The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me.

Kiuwan provides a detailed analysis and mitigation steps for any vulnerabilities reported, which is very helpful for teams in addressing the issues.

It boasts several great features, such as modularity, allowing you to choose specific models. The method of creating new rules using Kiuwan is quite efficient, which I find better compared to other systems. It's also effective in generating reports, be it on the overall results across the year or quarter or for specific analyses. I find it quite impressive in this aspect.

It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable.

I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison.

The most valuable feature of the solution is the continuous integration process. This enables us to make the best in terms of security of our solution and not introduce new mistakes. Problems are solved step by step. 

This program is very easy to use. I can use this tool, and I am new to these kinds of tools.

By far, the best feature we have found is the possibility of creating specific action plans that automatically determine the effort required by our teams in order to correct defects and ensure better code.

From the tool itself, the developer can run an analysis with the same quality. With this tool, every developer has the opportunity to do an unlimited analysis.

The solution can scale well.

The solution offers very good technical support.

It's quite a stable product.

I've found the reporting features the most helpful.

We only used these products to do some demos. The feedback was very positive.

• Very easy to use
• Integration with Jenkins and JIRA
• Security support

The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating.

The interface is usable and friendly.

Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices.

It is the most effective tool for IT procurement managers and directors. Technical debt metrics and action plans oriented to rejected deliveries.

• Easy, intuitive UI loaded with information about the software quality
• Automated lifecycle management
• Application portfolio governance support
• Technology coverage from COBOL to JS through ABAP: ideal for large organizations with legacy core systems trying to leverage new digital capabilities

I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance.

• We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities.
• Saving time and money by automatically identifying problems is unbelievable.

• Constant evolution
• Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP
• Excellent feedback
• Integration with SDLC tools
• API

I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable. I test code to pass PCI DSS requirements. I have improved my QA acceptance process with risk evaluation.

I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability.