Loadbalancer.org Competitors and Alternatives

The top Loadbalancer.org competitors are
Read reviews of Loadbalancer.org competitors and alternatives
Real User
Network Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 31 2016

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the F5 LTM most organisations will be using most. It provides the core functionality to be able to load balance services and the means and the intelligence to be able to load balance based on advanced logic, e.g.,... more»

How has it helped my organization?

It has enabled us to keep a sustainable and supported load balancing platform. This is partly due to Cisco withdrawing a large number of their load balancing products and also related to Microsoft Network Load Balancing not scaling enough to... more»

What needs improvement?

I would like F5 to incorporate the ability to create your own custom roles and customised permissions within the product set. I have seen many customers wanting to give a certain level of access for the purposes of out-of-hours servicing to... more»
Real User
Infrastructure Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Jun 13 2018

What is most valuable?

Kemp products are extremely stable and meet most of my customers' needs for an ADC solution. My customers appreciate the attractive pricing, stability. and user-friendly interface. The more advanced features such as WAF are rarely required by... more»

How has it helped my organization?

Kemp Loadmaster gives our customers an easy and cheap way of load-balancing their workloads and adding reverse proxy for added security. With Kemp 360 Central, they get a nice overview of their Kemp products and an easy way to upgrade... more»

What needs improvement?

There are plenty of features that are lacking in my opinion: * The auth website of ESP is really lacking. It’s not responsive Management Pack.
HAProxy
Consultant
Deployment Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
May 03 2018

What is most valuable?

Advanced traffic rules, including stick tables and ACLs, which allow me to shape traffic while it's load balanced. Performance configuration options with threads, processes, and core stickiness are also very valuable.

How has it helped my organization?

I can simplify configurations of many internal services (e.g. Web server configs) by moving some elements (like SSL) to HAProxy. I can also disable additional applications, like Varnish, by moving traffic shaping configurations to HAProxy.

What needs improvement?

In my opinion, there are three main areas to improve: * Make remote management more modern by adding API. * Propose a general HA solution for HAProxy (no I'm using keepalived for this). * Thread option should be a bit more stable.

Sign Up with Email