Loadbalancer.org Overview

Loadbalancer.org is the #14 ranked solution in our list of top Application Delivery Controllers. It is most often compared to HAProxy: Loadbalancer.org vs HAProxy

What is Loadbalancer.org?

Loadbalancer.org leads the market in delivering high-performance load balancers and load balancing solutions to customers around the world. Customers who depend on the high-availability of business critical applications can take advantage of unparalleled versatility, affordable costs and instant access to the industry’s most responsive 24/7 support – even during a free trial. Founded in 2002, Loadbalancer.org has offices in the USA, Canada, Germany and headquarters in the UK. With thousands of physical, virtual & cloud-based appliances deployed across six continents, Loadbalancer.org ensures the uptime of e-commerce websites & mission critical applications globally, whilst also improving performance, security, scalability and providing a rapid return on investment (ROI). Loadbalancer.org offers a no-nonsense approach and complete focus on load balancing.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: June 2021

Loadbalancer.org Customers
Vodafone, NASA, Mercedes, NBC, Siemens, AT&T, Barclays, Zurich, Penn State University, Fiserv, Canon, Toyota, University of Cambridge, US Army, US Navy, Ocean Spray, ASOS, Pfizer, BBC, Bacardi, Monsoon, River Island, U.S Air Force, King's College London, NHS, Ricoh, Philips, Santander, TATA Communications, Ericcson, Ross Video, Evertz, TalkTalk TV, Giacom, Rapid Host.

Pricing Advice

What users are saying about Loadbalancer.org pricing:
  • "For now, it's stable."

Filter Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
SA
IT manager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Stable internet management and access but the scalability needs improvement

What is our primary use case?

We are using this solution for internet management. We have approximately eight incoming ISP lines. All of the ISP lines go to the load balancer. We use it for normal internet access.

Pros and Cons

  • "For now, it's stable."
  • "It doesn't have the bonding capability feature."

What other advice do I have?

We are planning to change to another load balancer with the bonding capability feature. I would recommend this solution to others, but it would be better if it had the bonding capability. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Pandiyan Regunathan
Assistant Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Helps us to route the traffic to the available servers and protects the clusters

Pros and Cons

  • "It helps us to route the traffic to the available servers. If we didn't have Loadbalancer we would fail to set the end-user and it would cause a failure in the cluster."
  • "There are many features you can set in the backend of Loadbalancer. They should simplify the configuration. The administrator should be able to configure it more simply. How it is now, you can only configure it if you have a lot of experience."

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution. It's a market leader. The admin should know the product well before configuring it. They need experience. I would rate it an eight out of ten. Not a ten out of ten because of the complex configuration.