LoadUI Pro Competitors and Alternatives

Read reviews of LoadUI Pro competitors and alternatives
Micro focus logo
Micro Focus
Anonymous avatar x80
Real User
Lead Performance Architect at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Nov 21 2016

What is most valuable?

JMeter script integration. This integration feature is a good approach provided by HPE. Sometimes, we need to run scripts developed in an open source tool like JMeter. Instead of spending time on creating new scripts, the scripts developed in JMeter can be uploaded and based on the protocol license because it is a DEV user protocol, it provides a valuable... more»

What needs improvement?

Monitoring and sample access to servers needs to be provided, so that we can explore this and keep up-to-date. The licensed version / free edition needs to be configured with SiteScope or AppDynamics, which many customers might not have. The LoadRunner feature of Windows Resource Monitor should come in handy in such scenarios. It is not only for Windows-based... more»
Anonymous avatar x80
Real User
Senior Load Test Engineer at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees
Aug 24 2017

What do you think of Neotys NeoLoad?

Valuable Features There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis. • Improvements to My Organization Implementing this product has allowed us to increase the number of projects that get load testing, and the frequency by which we re-test our performance. • Room for Improvement It needs improvements in the UI. It's currently not as friendly as it should be. • Use of Solution We've used it for seven years. • Deployment Issues We haven't had any issues with deployment. • Stability Issues We have never experienced any isuses with stability. • Scalability Issues The product has scaled very well up until this point. • Customer Service and Technical Support The support from Neotys is very good....
Micro focus logo
Micro Focus
Foster
Real User
Performance Test Lead at a tech consulting company with 501-1,000 employees
Jun 13 2017

What do you think of LoadRunner?

Valuable Features The capabilities and flexibility of the Controller, the ability to monitor the systems under test, and the comprehensive results Analysis which saves a great deal of time. • Room for Improvement More guidance on the use of the Tru Client protocol which is used for Web interfaces. • Use of Solution 15 years • Deployment Issues LoadRunner generally deploys without issues. • Stability Issues Its a complex product and there are usually a few bugs in the point zero releases, it is generally pretty reliable. Sometimes the controller can crash, this is usually after opening and closing several scenarios without closing the controller. Closing the controller after a couple of scenarios opened will avoid the problem. • Scalability Issues Scalability...
Anonymous avatar x80
Real User
QA Engineer at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 22 2016

What is most valuable?

This is the best tool I have used till today as it allows us to handle automation in variety of ways. It has lots of features which are bundled together in a single package (e.g. OTM, OFT). We can use the same automated test script for functional testing. Lots of features are there in it. Best tool for automation on Siebel Object.

What needs improvement?

* Need to improve in Object Identification process. * Performance is slow as compared to other tools like QTP. * Internet Explorer is facing difficulties in identifying siebel object so browser functionality needs to be improved etc.
27f847b5 ad40 4238 bd5a fdf0bac75d84 avatar
Real User
Manager Performance Engineering at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Nov 04 2016

What is most valuable?

What I really like is our team's core competence in building good tests that really do find issues, because of our full-time dedication to it. We have Performance Center as a platform to share with others that don't do performance testing... more»

How has it helped my organization?

It allows us to on the reporting end show how even though we don't have a smoking gun on this release, and it made everything so terrible that we've got real quality issues, we know when it started and that it's only getting worse. When... more»

What needs improvement?

I know there are integrations with continuous testing. It's got tie-ins to some of the newer tools to allow continuous testing. I'd love to see us not have to customize it, but for it to be out of the box. I have some concern over its... more»
38f1ffa6 3ca2 401a 9592 38b51af901ca avatar
Real User
Quality Assurance Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jan 09 2017

What do you think of RadView WebLOAD?

Valuable Features From my perspective, the most valuable feature is the ability to test APIs. Another benefit is how the correlation engine turn a lot of the dynamic contents into variables. That's a real big thing for us. • Room for Improvement It's a pretty strong product from a load-testing perspective, easy to use and you can actually get the tool up running fairly quickly. It would be great, in addition to the load tool, it would be nice, if Radview offered a JavaScript based functional test tool as well. That would be nice. • Use of Solution We have been using RadView since about 2003. • Deployment Issues None • Stability Issues It's stable. It's a pretty quick and easy install, even when they added the analytical piece, before the reports were built into the...

Sign Up with Email