Trellix Endpoint Security Other Solutions Considered
RS
reviewer2099124
Assistant Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We use several products simultaneously and are using the solution in a test case. It might take two or three months to confirm if we plan to deploy to our production environment.
View full review »We've looked into and worked with McAfee, Trend Micro, Kaspersky, and Symantec.
View full review »GZ
reviewer1676862
IS Manager, Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
We are in the process of moving away from McAfee Endpoint Security and replacing it with Cylance.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Trellix Endpoint Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
WM
Wilfred Mwigio
ITOfficer at U.S. Army Medical Research Unit - Kenya
We currently considering switching from Trellix to Bitdefender mainly because Trellix isn't really focused on malware, and right now most threats are coming from within the organization as malware. Malware is something that can stop business continuity, so that's one of our main areas of focus, and Trellix is not doing really well within that perspective.
All of the endpoint security solutions have more or less the same kind of features. There is nothing exceptional about one product versus the other. McAfee is not as strong as other solutions like Kaspersky, Trend Micro, or Carbon Black.
View full review »MO
Manuel Ochoa
Support Security Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Our clients ask us about other solutions like Cylance. I have one client that uses CrowdStrike. If you compare Cylance and McAfee Endpoint Security, the main difference is support.
McAfee is excellent. You can ask any questions, and with a couple of clicks, you will find the answer to the issue. If you don't find it, you can open a support ticket. Sometimes, the McAfee solutions are very complex to configure. Just in some topics, but on the other hand, very simple to configure.
View full review »MV
Madhav Vishwakarma
Software Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
We did not evaluate any other solutions before taking on this solution.
View full review »DB
reviewer1442769
System Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
One of our subsidiaries has tried to switch products, although I don't know the reason why. Ultimately, the project was aborted.
View full review »MV
reviewer1063173
Managing Director at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
This is indeed a premium product when compared to others.
View full review »I have used F-Secure, Symantec, Kaspersky Lab and Trend Micro.
View full review »We evaluated Kaspersky and Trend Micro.
View full review »We looked at Norton and we used Gartner to see what players were in the space and looked at them all.
View full review »We did not evaluate other options. McAfee is a clear choice to make, when running an ePO server as well as other endpoint products from McAfee. They really integrate well with each other and that is a strong force within the fight against malware and ransomware attacks.
View full review »I have evaluated Bitdefender, Kaspersky and Symantec.
View full review »There were no other issues evaluated.
View full review »We evaluated Norton, Kaspersky, Panda, and many others.
View full review »Trend Micro and ESET.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Trellix Endpoint Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.