McAfee Endpoint Security Overview
McAfee Endpoint Security is the #14 ranked solution in our list of endpoint security software. It is most often compared to McAfee MVISION Endpoint: McAfee Endpoint Security vs McAfee MVISION Endpoint
What is McAfee Endpoint Security?
McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection allows you to protect all of your devices with intelligent, collaborative security, in one easy-to-manage, integrated solution. Our integrated endpoint security framework helps remove redundancies, enables fast, proven performance and offers an architecture to align both current and future security investments. With a flexible choice of cloud-based or a local management console, security administrators also get true centralized management that simplifies ongoing tasks, deployment and monitoring.
McAfee Endpoint Security is also known as McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint Protection.
McAfee Endpoint Security Buyer's Guide
Download the McAfee Endpoint Security Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: July 2021
McAfee Endpoint Security Customers
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
McAfee Endpoint Security Video
What users are saying about McAfee Endpoint Security pricing:
- "Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year."
- "We pay 650 Rand for a license. It is a perpetual license which we normally run for two years."
- "McAfee's prices are flexible and can be quite competitive, although there are other solutions that are even more so."
- "We pay for the license on an annual basis."
- Highest Rating
- Lowest Rating
- Review Length
Showingreviews based on the current filters.
IT Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Real UserTop 10
Feb 19, 2021
Protect your business against a wide variety of threats
What is our primary use case?We currently have around 50 servers. We aren't really a big company but we have 50 servers which we manage. We use McAfee for the web filtering portion of it. For example, if a user is doing a search on Google, there's a risk-rating web content filter built into McAfee. This alerts us if there are any threats present. We have licensed McAfee ENS on a per-server basis. As of now, from memory, I think we have 56 endpoints running McAfee — 56 servers in total.
Pros and Cons
- "It's quite easy to install agents."
- "With McAfee, if there is a zero-day vulnerability, you have to download the patch for it from the McAfee website, then apply it to your endpoint."
What other advice do I have?I would definitely recommend this solution to others. McAfee is a good product. I worked with Symantec, but personally, I think McAfee is better. However, in my opinion, now having worked with CylancePROTECT and OPTICS, I think CylancePROTECT and OPTICS are on another level. Still, we have been working with McAfee for nearly 10 years and I feel it's a very good product. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give McAfee a rating of eight.
VP - Cyber Security at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jul 1, 2020
Very scalable and easy to manage but package size is too large
What is our primary use case?The solution has three primary uses for us. Our environment is Windows-based. We don't have Mac and very little space for Linux systems. We use the solution on all of our Windows devices as a basic antivirus protection. That's our first use case. The second use case for the solution is to be able to have USB restrictions on my endpoints. And the third would be the protection of machines when, especially now in this COVID-19 climate, users connect from home. There are a lot of network-based attacks. When users are connecting from other networks, they're protected from dangers with this solution
Pros and Cons
- "The manageability of the product itself is its most valuable aspect. You have the underlying EPO, and on top of it, you can deploy the various components as you require. This is unlike other solutions like Symantec where you have to deploy everything or nothing. With this solution, you can choose to only deploy antivirus or only deploy a firewall, or only something else. I choose the components and that deployment is done through EPO. It makes manageability very flexible."
- "There are two main areas that require improvement. One is the size of the packages. Although I'll admit manageability is good, if I want to deploy, let's say just the antivirus or just the firewall, each of those package sizes are quite large. They are sometimes as big as 200MB or 250MB. When I have operations in remote areas where connectivity is always poor, it's difficult. To deploy such a package in a remote location over the internet or something like that is always challenging."
What other advice do I have?I would advise, if somebody's looking at buying a brand new solution fresh or have a solution coming up for renewal, to look at the next generation antivirus products. The next-generation products are far more sophisticated. They might be a little higher in price, but in terms of manageability, updates, and the packet size, they are far superior. McAfee has released something called Envision. It's a next-generation antivirus. In this other solution, they have incorporated a lot of next-generation technologies. It's a different license and a higher-priced license altogether. Overall, I would…
Learn what your peers think about McAfee Endpoint Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Support Security Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Real UserTop 20
Mar 29, 2021
An endpoint security solution with a valuable threat prevention feature
What is our primary use case?I work for a company that is a McAfee partner. We sell the solution, and we have engineers that implement the solutions. Basically, I am part of the technical staff that implements the solution on-premise. We use endpoint security for our clients. We configure policies to scan the computer every single day in some cases and every week or even every moment. Basically, it protects the endpoint, and we have policies to do advanced threat protection.
Pros and Cons
- "Threat prevention is valuable because most clients use other solutions like antivirus as part of web protection. I don't find that kind of solution useful."
- "The local technical support could be better."
What other advice do I have?I recommend that the client needs to be aware of what McAfee can do for them. If the engineer can implement the solution, he'll just follow the book, and he's not going to get the best experience from the product. To not impact the computer or the endpoint's performance, you need to finetune the policies. If the engineer doesn't have that kind of experience, you won't get the best out of the product. The client needs to get an engineer with a lot of performance tuning experience to get the most out of the product. On a scale from one to ten, I would give McAfee Endpoint Security a nine.
Senior Project Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has the ability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices
What is our primary use case?This product is mainly used for detecting viruses and malware on the laptops and also to scan older, existing files.
Pros and Cons
- "This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."
- "The product could do more to keep administration alerted to detected threats on endpoints."
What other advice do I have?I recommend McAfee VirusScan to everyone in an enterprise environment. Part of the reason is that nowadays everyone is working from home. Their systems and devices have to be secure when they are connecting externally to the internal network with whatever device they are using. They should have at least one security solution in their system so that they can avoid vulnerabilities that they may encounter outside of the secure internal network. VirusScan ensures that is happening. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate McAfee VirusScan Enterprise as a…
IT Security Specialist at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Real UserTop 20
Apr 11, 2021
Stable with good technical support and very good threat prevention capabilities
What is our primary use case?We basically use the solution for threat detection. It's for security purposes.
Pros and Cons
- "The product is quite user-friendly."
- "Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."
What other advice do I have?We are customers and end-users. We don't have a business relationship with McAfee. We are a central bank and one of the things that we haven't really experienced or gone into is putting our solutions into the cloud - even though everything is moving in that direction. We are moving slowly in that direction as well. We'll get there one day. I have found this solution easy to use. When you need support, you get it. Even in terms of protection, it's fine. I would recommend it to other users. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
Security Consultant at CS Africa
Jul 23, 2021
A high detection rate for a solution that is always improving
What is our primary use case?We are using the latest version at the moment because I'm managed by the MVISION tenants. In the past, many people had issues with the utilization of detections and resources. ENS is actually very good for detection. When properly configured, especially when the prevention feature is activated, it integrates very well with the ATP, in respect of the endpoint. ATP offers very good protection and is a rich solution which helps to remove ransomware. I've been using the product for a while now and been able to secure a lot of environmental ransomware attacks, as well as some others, by integrating… more »
Pros and Cons
- "The detection is great and the solution is constantly improving."
- "It would be nice if the solution were to allow not just on-cloud management, but on-premises, as well."
What other advice do I have?The solution does a fine job of integration. It is deployed in the cloud. My organization is very big. Like I said, we're systems integrators. As we are a distribution company, I am in a position to speak from a technical point of view. I've actually seen environments that reach 16,000. I did the deployment for a bank in Ghana, which is under the management of the Pan-African Bank and is responsible for management throughout all of Africa, save for Nigeria. This involved around 15,000 nodes. There is another bank in Nigeria with between 4,000 to 6,000 nodes and still others with around 12,000…
Junior Manager at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Real UserTop 5
Jun 29, 2021
A stable antivirus solution, but consumes too much memory and CPU resources
What is our primary use case?We are using ePO Center Server to communicate with all the endpoints that are in the network. While I cannot be certain, I believe the relevant version is McAfee 8 or 9. We make use of McAfee Agent version number 184.108.40.206. We utilize McAfee Data Exchange Layer. The McAfee Endpoint Security version to which we refer is 10.7. We use the solution for antivirus purposes.
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is stable."
- "We don't like the solution since it requires much memory consumption and consumes much CPU resources."
What other advice do I have?The solution is in-house, on-premises. There are 300 people making use of the solution in our organization. When it comes to the question of whether I would recommend this solution to others, we can see that McAfee greatly lags behind CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Cortex, Cynet and Sophos, which are the top performing security solutions on the market. I would rate McAfee Endpoint Security as a five or six out of ten.
Senior System Administrator at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Real UserTop 20
Mar 29, 2021
Good remote installation and malware detection with the capability to scale
What is our primary use case?We primarily use the solution for endpoint security.
Pros and Cons
- "The solution scales well."
- "The solution takes up a high amount of memory and can cause the system to hang."
What other advice do I have?We're just a customer and an end-user. We're doing the latest version of the solution. I do not have the version number on-hand. 50% of companies are facing ransomware issues right now. We have also faced that in the past. That's why we have looked into Apex One. We have installed that. All systems are under Apex One. Everything is updated, however, it's not protected as it's not continuously communicating with the data centers. They are not updating the algorithm as they should. They need to make improvements to that part. Overall, I would rate the solution eight out of ten. I'd recommend the…
See 22 more McAfee Endpoint Security Reviews
Product CategoriesEndpoint Protection for Business (EPP)
Download our free McAfee Endpoint Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
- What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
- When evaluating Endpoint Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Which ransomware is the biggest threat in 2020?
- How was the 2020 Twitter Hack carried out? How could it have been prevented?
- What is the best for ransomware infection?
- What security measures should businesses prioritize to support secure remote work?
- SCCM vs BigFix: what are pros and cons?
- Why is endpoint security important?