The solution is very stable.

It is very stable based on our experience and the application performance has been superb. It is much better compared to what we had before when we were using MPLS. The fact is that this solution introduces quite a lot of flexibility and that it is SSO (Single Sign-On) adaptable is helpful. At the same time, we have good scalability. Those are major benefits for us.  

The stability is very good so is rated an eight out of ten. 

We haven't had any issues with stability.

It's very stable. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten simply because there have been a couple of outages. And the outages, when they occur, are in the cloud platform, the Meraki platform, as it's all web-based, internet-based, where there have been some issues with client authentication for the VPN because it's RADIUS-based and it's in the cloud. 

So if the cloud is down, those users can't log in to the VPN, and that's created some issues in the past. In other words, about two years ago, we had a couple of outages, and I had some angry calls.

But apart from that, it's been pretty stable.

Stability-wise, I rate this solution an eight and a half out of ten. I would like improved stability in Meraki SD-WAN. Also, it is a very user-friendly solution. So, whenever you want to implement a new site, you can get options that are user-friendly and UI-based, which are very straightforward in nature. Basically, there are no complexities involved. So, a person involved in the solution's implementation can understand everything.

The stability of this solution is fine. It has a Fusion version. It does what it prompts.

From the stability perspective, everybody is pretty much on the same level playing field. I don't really see anybody standing out more than anybody else. Meraki is a low-cost equipment provider, so they're not offering big metal devices that plug into racks and a data center. They're more along the lines of the hard plastic desktop type of units. They have the same meantime between failure as most other products, so it's difficult to put them above or below anybody else. They all are pretty much on the same level playing field.

The stability is pretty good. I'd rate it an eight or nine out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

As far as we can tell, the stability's great. The speed is great. We didn't experiment with it that much to have the opportunity to really see any faults. We've just come in and tried to catch up with everything that was going on.

The product’s stability is very perfect.

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

We've had a few minor things where it's gone down, but it has been stable most of the time.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

Meraki SD-WAN is a stable solution. It had well-managed updates that created a pretty stable and manageable environment overall.

The solution is quite stable. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

It is stable for my business requirements. Some of our locations are assembly branches, so we use MX60 at those locations. We use that effective product for user compatibility, and we haven't had any issues.

Overall, the solution has been stable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. It's pretty reliable. 

The stability of Meraki SD-WAN is good.

It's very stable, and the overall cloud availability or management plan availability is almost 99.5%. It is absolutely awesome.

So far it has been stable. We have no issues with stability.

The solution is stable. There aren’t bugs or glitches, and it doesn’t crash or freeze. It is reliable.

Our impressions of the stability of SD-WAN is good at this point. We have had no issues that I know of up until this moment.  Whether we will later on remains uncertain. For now  everything is stable and working well.

I rate the stability of Meraki SD-WAN a nine out of ten.

I'm not directly involved in SD-WAN monitoring and maintenance, but based on what I've heard from our infrastructure team, it's working well.

Meraki SD-WAN is a stable solution.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is stable, despite the occasional VoiP dropouts. 

 I rate Meraki SD-WAN nine out of 10 for stability. 

I would rate the stability as eight out of ten. It's quite stable, but we've had issues in the past.

The solution is relatively stable.

We have had no issues in terms of stability.

The solution is stable.

Meraki SD-WAN is stable and the performance is good.

It's very stable.

The tool is very stable. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

It is very stable.

Meraki SD-WAN provides a very stable environment.

For example, when I travel out of my city, I still have remote access to my Meraki device. I can access things like my camera feed, I can see my dashboards, and I can manage users. The connection is almost always on, 24/7, with no downtime. In cases where there is downtime, it is almost always a problem with the provider and not the Meraki device.

The solution is stable.

There is definite stability with good performance.

The feedback that I have received is that it's a pretty stable solution.

This solution is stable and I have not found any issues in particular.

We have found the solution to be stable. There are no bugs or glitches. The performance is good. We don't worry about it crashing or freezing. It's reliable. 

We have not had any problems with the stability of the solution.

For the small environments that we have used it in, this has been a stable product.

The stability is very good.

The solution is very stable.

When it comes to the question of the solution's broader stability, I would state that it is stable. Cisco classic models boast the best stability, although Meraki is also fine. I can say that it is quite stable, as well. 

Meraki SD-WAN is a very stable solution. 

This is a stable product.

The solution is stable.

We don't have issues with stability.