Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Pros and Cons

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Pros

Don Ingerson
QA Automation Engineer at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needs
View full review »
Sarah Kemle
IT Business Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The ability to integrate this solution with other applications is helpful. If there is automation, it comes with improved quality and speed.
This solution is open and very easy to integrate. The interface is good too.
View full review »
Ivana Buljan
Product Development Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
From reporting to team management, everything is better now.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Atlassian, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ReviewerB3126
Vice President - Test Management Lead at DBS Bank
The AI and functionality interface are useful.
It has a good response time.
View full review »
Frank Westerbuhr
Expert System Test and Test Tools at Airbus Operations
By using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.
View full review »
Yavor Piperov
Founder & Software Solutions Manager at infomera
It provides visibility on release status and readiness.
It allows us to easily make linkage and dependencies, with plenty of integrations.
View full review »
Domingo Saavedra
QA Analyst at Tsoft
Lab Management is a valuable feature, because you have a 360 view.
View full review »

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Cons

Don Ingerson
QA Automation Engineer at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.
View full review »
Sarah Kemle
IT Business Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
There needs to be improvement in the requirement samples. At the moment, they are very basic.
View full review »
Ivana Buljan
Product Development Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
ALM uses a waterfall approach. We have some hybrid approaches in the company and need a more agile approach.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Atlassian, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ReviewerB3126
Vice President - Test Management Lead at DBS Bank
Certain features are lousy. Those features can drag the whole server down. There are times that the complex SQL queries are not easy to do within this solution.
View full review »
Frank Westerbuhr
Expert System Test and Test Tools at Airbus Operations
We would like to have support for agile development.
View full review »
Yavor Piperov
Founder & Software Solutions Manager at infomera
It needs Pure-FTPd WebUI and single sign-on.
View full review »
Domingo Saavedra
QA Analyst at Tsoft
The QA needs improvement.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Atlassian, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.