Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Pros and Cons
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Pros
Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needsView full review »
The ability to integrate this solution with other applications is helpful. If there is automation, it comes with improved quality and speed.
This solution is open and very easy to integrate. The interface is good too.View full review »
From reporting to team management, everything is better now.View full review »
The AI and functionality interface are useful.
It has a good response time.View full review »
By using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.View full review »
It provides visibility on release status and readiness.
It allows us to easily make linkage and dependencies, with plenty of integrations.View full review »
Lab Management is a valuable feature, because you have a 360 view.View full review »
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Cons
The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.View full review »
There needs to be improvement in the requirement samples. At the moment, they are very basic.View full review »
ALM uses a waterfall approach. We have some hybrid approaches in the company and need a more agile approach.View full review »
Certain features are lousy. Those features can drag the whole server down. There are times that the complex SQL queries are not easy to do within this solution.View full review »
We would like to have support for agile development.View full review »
It needs Pure-FTPd WebUI and single sign-on.View full review »
The QA needs improvement.View full review »