OpenText ALM / Quality Center Previous Solutions
We were using Tricentis and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center to compare which one was better. However, we deployed Micro Focus ALM Quality Center a lot more and at this point, it would be difficult to migrate to a new solution. This is one of the main reasons why we use this solution. However, as a company, we wanted to use the best solution and at this time there is still a debate.
View full review »Micro Focus ALM is better than IBM or other solutions I have worked with.
View full review »LG
Lisa Gordon
IS Director, ERP PTP Solution Architecture at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
I've worked with HP Quality Center at a prior job.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText ALM / Quality Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
I have worked at companies that used open source tools and ALM/Quality Center. I have also worked at a company that simultaneously used both Quality Center and Rally. Rally is also a good tool and seems to be developed more for the Agile methodology. However, when using UFT we always used it with ALM/Quality Center because we could store all of the run results from automated tests.
View full review »We were looking at other solutions, such as JIRA, due to all the issues I have raised.
View full review »I've been at my current job for the last 11 years and we have been using it from its days as Test Director and QC days. So far, we haven't tried anything else and have stuck with it.
View full review »AY
Ashish Yelkar
Managing Partner at Verve Square Technologies
I have always used different versions of ALM. I did not previously use a different solution before using ALM.
View full review »IM
Ira Mayer
Senior SW Quality Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Previously, we had no application lifecycle management tool, so there was a lack of coordination about requirements and no traceability regarding which requirements had been tested. Sometimes, defects were being reported by email. Now, everything works well, which is a huge improvement for my company.
View full review »VR
Vishwa-Reddy
Team Lead at Accenture
Previously we were using Excel. Then the organization moved the entire thing into the ALM. It is now the central point for whatever needs testing.
View full review »SR
Sanjeev Ranjan
Tools Architect at S2 Integrators
We've only ever used this solution. We did not use anything else previously.
View full review »We previously used IBM Rational.
View full review »ST
Shinu Thulaseedharan
IT Quality and Architecture Senior Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Before ALM, we were only using Excel. But along with ALM right now, we also have some projects that are using JIRA, and there are some people who are using Confluence. The digital teams here are using JIRA.
View full review »I have used other solutions, but many do not have the traceability requirements that ALM does.
View full review »The collaboration between HPE and us, especially over the past ten years, has been very good. For that reason, I try to bring in more HPE products, if needed.
View full review »Beforehand we were using just paper and Excel, and things like that. As soon as ALM was tested at the time we began to use it and sensed it's presence in the company and now every tester is using it.
View full review »PA
reviewer1949529
Head of Testing - Warehouse Solutions at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We have previously used JIRA, but ALM was a better solution for us.
View full review »My organization previously used HP Quality Center, but I don't remember the differences between that solution and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. I also don't make decisions on whether to move from one solution to another solution.
View full review »In the Quality Center, there's a tool, which we started with, QuickTest Pro. From there, we started to use QuickTest Pro, later we introduced and evaluated it. It looked like the situation we needed.
However, we wanted tracking. We started with QuickTest Pro, but now we're doing this, which includes a lot of the different areas, like it handles the workflow and/or agile and involving many necessary departments.
I’ve been around a while and designed a few test management and automation solutions while I was with Motorola. I think our solutions were better, but of course, we had to spend a lot of resources on their creation.
View full review »SF
reviewer1444647
Sr. Manager - SAP Authorization & Complaince at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
This is the first one that our company used.
View full review »Initially, we were using other products but HPE acquired a couple of those companies. Now with the recent movement towards pushing their software out to Micro Focus that may change a little bit of the relationship we have with HPE. That's another reason why I attended the conference, is to understand a bit more about how that relationship will evolve.
View full review »Earlier I used Mantis, but it was not user friendly and had no functionality apart from defect tracking. But HP QC is defect tracking by default. Test Case Execution tracking and reporting functionality which will serve all purposes for testing processes.
View full review »Yes – HPE QC is much better than anything else I have seen.
View full review »We used a lot of home grown 'tools' and spreadsheets in one location and Lotus Notes in another.
View full review »We acquired HPE products a long time ago before I was around.
View full review »Quality Center was around well before I got to the company.
View full review »Our organization is very new in this area. We are a pretty young company. We didn't have any formal task-management kind of tool or testing tool per se. When we were looking at the solution one of our implementation partners for one of the projects recommended it and we looked at it and it's capability. Many of the folks who are on the team have used it in other companies. For the current organization it was a no-brainer not to pick this tool.
View full review »No previous solution used.
View full review »I had already used IBM Rational, which is good too, but the HP tool is more complete.
View full review »JG
Jordan Gottlieb
Principal consultant qa architect at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
When I became a customer in 2000/2001, when I first started, I was involved in the decision to purchase the solution. Now, as a professional services consultant, that decision has been made and I'm going in there to either deploy, upgrade, or help them use ALM to best suit their needs. In some cases I help them figure out what it is they need to have ALM do for them or how to customize it best.
When I was a customer, we were not using another solution. We were completely manual and I was a department of one. I was the QA organization for a small development company and the two company owners said to me, "We want to invest in this, go look and see what's out there and show us what our options are and what you think the best option is."
What caused us to switch to this solution was the customizability. The fact that we could make it give us the information that we needed to get out of it. The support organization seemed very top-notch. I actually learned a lot from the support organization when I was getting started in it. And I found it more intuitive then the Rational solution.
View full review »JO
John ONeill
Principle consultant at Active Data Consulting Services Pty Ltd
In the past, we used a Compuware Solution and an open source solution. We switched to ALM because tracking all activities is better when all your monitoring is on products from the same vendor.
View full review »We didn't use any other solution previously.
View full review »We're using JIRA alongside ALM, but there wasn't a prior solution to ALM.
View full review »QA was driven by spreadsheets before the deployment of Test Director.
View full review »We really started using ALM about five years ago when our testing automation efforts kicked into high gear. Up until then, we were tracking testing using various other smaller tools.
View full review »No, I have not used a different solution in the past.
View full review »Yes, we used Rational ClearQuest. It was very customizable too but it was old and tough and we need a better and more elegant solution.
We use ALM for all of our applications and didn't use anything before. We're a maturing software company, so we're really getting into these distinct processes, like ALM. We're currently going through a transformation into Agile, so we're really just ramping up to get to that mature stage as a software company.
View full review »When I took over Quality Assurance, we had Quality Center. ALM is the new Quality Center, and we upgraded to version 12 of ALM. 550 projects with no problems.
View full review »KG
KimberlyGoodman
Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
This is the only solution I have ever used. I don't know if the company worked with something else previously.
View full review »HPE ALM was our first choice.
View full review »We have used this application for a number of years now. There have been explorations of a variety of open source, "DevOps-inspired" applications, as a potential replacement. To date, there has been no determination to move away from this application as our standard.
View full review »We did not previously utilize a different solution for managing our requirements and testing efforts.
View full review »In the Application Lifecycle Management space, HP ALM and IBM Rational are the two big players. I recently participated in an evaluation of the IBM Rational Jazz Platform. The client had been using IBM’s ClearCase and ClearQuest for many years. During the evaluation, an unrelated IBM audit detected a long dormant pack of five ClearCase licenses on an active server. The cost associated with this incident ended our evaluation of the IBM solution.
Historically, most people considered this to be a defect tracking only tool. In that domain, tools are plentiful. Over the years I’ve used VI editor on UNIX, Microsoft Excel worksheets Microsoft Access databases, Bugzilla and Notepad for defect management.
View full review »
No. We have other HP Products like LoadRunner, Quality Center etc. So we wanted to have ALM which integrates seamlessly with these products.
View full review »
CJ
reviewer1662489
National Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
I also use Microsoft Azure DevOps. I don't really have a preference. It is horses for courses, and it depends on the type of application you're running. For older style waterfall projects, you can probably go with Micro Focus, barring pricing and others things. For agile or particularly a Microsoft Azure-based product, I would go with DevOps because of the better pipeline and the whole end-to-end integration.
View full review »PG
reviewer1357974
Performance and Automation Testing Squad Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Before Quality Center the only thing we were using was JIRA. We interface with JIRA. Some teams want to use it for defect tracking. We keep JIRA and ALM in sync using the synchronizer tool that comes standard with it.
JIRA and ALM have different strengths. JIRA and Confluence do Agile planning and management well, and ALM does defect management and test case management and reporting well.
View full review »Not relevant.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
We still use a variety of SDLC tools within my organization. However, HPE ALM has been determined to be the best all around solution for testing of software across the enterprise.
We are doing a number of activities to reach a common goal, including leveraging the ALM template functionality and defining fields and list values across all testing applications.
View full review »No previous solution used.
View full review »MR
reviewer1137345
Sr. Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Ours is strictly partnership, so we haven't dealt with any other ALM type of products from other vendors.
View full review »I did not personally, but in my previous organization Bugzilla was used. ALM replaced it because it was a complete package, and also the company had bought other HP testing tools like UFT & PC to meet end to end testing needs.
View full review »Jira
View full review »We were using JIRA before and still are using JIRA. But that is only a section of coverage, so we needed something that has a broader coverage of the process, and the ALM was the choice.
View full review »No previous solution was used.
View full review »PT
Pankaj Thakur
System Engineer at Tata Consultancy
I previously used Microsoft Azure.
View full review »I wasn't involved in the overall decision, just on which version to select.
View full review »No solution was previously in place.
View full review »We use multiple solutions depending on the needs of our client at the time.
View full review »We used Excel, but it was so difficult to manage the various Excel files and sheets just like maintaining a register book for your records. ALM allows you to handle them all with just one click.
View full review »We didn't have any other solution in place, and needed to have a much better solution than doing testing with Excel files.
View full review »Need of a single solution for all needs.
View full review »Had used Quality Center and Test Director in the past and HPE ALM is much more enhanced and useful.
View full review »IB
Ivana Buljan
Product Development Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Before, we used Excel for complex testings. Using this solution has been a huge step for us. From reporting to team management, everything is better now.
View full review »I previously had used QC at a different company. I know I need a test management tool. When I joined the company, we already had this one, but I wanted to move to SaaS, because I needed something that was not on-premise based.
View full review »Yes, spreadsheets. We switched because we grew from three people to 10 and needed a tool. ALM was one most of the team had used at other companies.
View full review »Previously, I have used Redmine and JIRA. Switching to HPE ALM was not my decision, I changed my job.
View full review »We have always been using HPE products, so we have just grown with it.
View full review »No previous solution was used.
View full review »We did not have a previous solution. This was our first solution.
View full review »There was no previous solution was in place.
View full review »We used Word documents, which was not efficient.
View full review »The switch to HPE QC was made because the existing system was not considered GAMP-compliant.
View full review »We figured out HP ALM is good and switched from using Excel spreadsheets.
View full review »We were using Excel spreadsheets to try and test a major system change in a bank. Need I say more?
View full review »No. We have used Quality Center/ALM since I joined this organization.
View full review »Earlier, we used a home-grown, Lotus Notes-based system. Later on, I moved to a position where HPE QC was already being used.
View full review »We were previously just recording all our test evidence in Word documents. So we needed a test center.
View full review »Have been using a version of this solution since 1999. Have not used competing products day to day as of yet.
View full review »I have worked on TFS. The features of TFS are limited when compared to QC.
View full review »We used JIRA. Its is also a good tool for defect tracking, but due to the lack of test and requirements management in JIRA, we have moved to ALM.
View full review »
We weren't previously using another solution.
View full review »
MS Excel was our first solution.
View full review »RS
Ravi Suvvari
Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees
We previously used Bugzilla and switched because Quality Center is easier to use, has good reporting, and has better accessibility.
View full review »NS
Nimmagadda Sudhir
Team Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
We checked out other tools like JIRA and Rally which also have good features, but HPE ALM has is user friendly.
View full review »We switched because the previous solution was lacking features to manage a complete life-cycle.
View full review »I have worked at other companies, I cannot choose between solutions.
View full review »OO
Oluseye Oyede
Software Quality Assurance & Testing Specialist, MTN Nigeria Ltd at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We did not use a different solution previously.
View full review »We previously used RTM, and we switched because ALM is better than IBM RTM tool.
View full review »I did not choose this product, it was onsite before I started the contract with this particular client, and I have seen and used this product at a few client sites.
View full review »SC
Srinivasa Chamarty
Project Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have other open source products that do not meet all our requirements
View full review »Yes, it was forced on the company. Change was to facilitate management of defects between multiple parties.
View full review »I have no experience using other test management softwares.
View full review »We have used HPE QC from the onset as the scale of our operation and the throughput of requirements were greater so using other solutions, such as Kanban, were not feasible in our project.
View full review »No previous solution was used.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText ALM / Quality Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.