OpenText Content Manager Previous Solutions
I use SharePoint and IBM, but OpenText Content Manager is better. The system's ease of use and accessibility for individuals experienced in managing a browser and internal browser make OpenText products user-friendly.
I don't have any previous experience with any other solutions apart from OpenText Content Manager.
We actually had two systems in-house for many years. We consolidated down to one.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText Content Manager
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Content Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BM
reviewer2302434
Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
We used IBM FinNet and Documentum for migrations, which were not part of OpenText then.
View full review »We used various tools previously. We want to go to one integrated environment. But we have to benchmark the tools to determine whether they decrease or increase efficiency and then optimize all the processes. We have too many solutions that are too costly, and we want to go to one integrated environment.
View full review »The organisation did not use an EDRMS to manage records prior to implementing HPE CM. In the past, Access databases and catalogue systems have been used.
View full review »EW
Eric Wyatt
IT Director / CIO at Matanuska-Sustina Borough
We did not use another solution prior to this one.
View full review »SB
Scott Brown
Records Manager at a sports company with 51-200 employees
We did not have a previous solution.
View full review »We previously used a custom “in-house” solution, which did not allow us to manage “electronic items” as records.
View full review »I have used custom and integrated SharePoint systems that were not able to handle large amounts of content as easily as HPE Content Manager. Managing the moving of content was particularly difficult and SharePoint’s security model doesn’t allow for security classifications to be added to content to restrict access. The long-term management (applying retention schedules) of content for archiving was much more difficult to implement.
View full review »I am not aware of any previous solutions.
View full review »TRIM is a reliable solution and has EDRMS compatibility, which others products lack. Hence, we never really looked at other products.
View full review »We have used many that do not deliver what they say so we chose the above because they deliver the goods. However, licensing is always an issue.
View full review »JC
Jason Campey
HP TRIM/HPRM Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I have trialed other EDRMS solutions, though Content Manager is the software leader.
View full review »There was no document management system for the entire organization. However, one department (legal) was using Worldox, due the integration with their case management system.
View full review »MQ
reviewer984855
Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Prior to the use of Micro Focus Content Manager we made use of SharePoint. We switched to the current solution since it provides a more mature process of records management.
We used different in-house solutions over 15 years ago. They didn’t have many options and someone in-house had to create and manage them.
View full review »Our previous solution was outdated and non-compliant.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText Content Manager
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Content Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.