OpenText Data Protector Previous Solutions
MP
MohammedPasha1
Individual Contributor at Unemployed customer
I was experimenting with various monitoring tools. Working with SDM, Structure Data Manager, and Data Protector with automation and integrations.
View full review »I use OpenText Data Protector along with OpenText VIM. OpenText VIM has evolved a lot, while OpenText Data Protector hasn't changed much. OpenText VIM has now added features that were missing in the tool earlier. My company does the consolidation part on OpenText VIM while trying to get rid of OpenText Data Protector.
NN
Ngonga Nkuba
Assistant Manager - Data Center at Bank of Zambia
The decision to switch was made by the management team, and I don't have all the details on what criteria they considered. However, I believe they wanted a solution that could support Linux workloads in addition to our primary usage of Veritas for Windows backups. The switch was motivated by the need to cater to both Linux and Windows workloads.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText Data Protector
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Data Protector. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
I didn't use a different solution before using Micro Focus Data Protector. It is a first for me.
View full review »JA
Jason Antes
Senior Systems Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have used this product for the last 13 years. I do periodically review other solutions. Many have great features, but are too limited in scope for a shop that does not have a dedicated backup administrator.
Having to administer a different solution for each backup type would take too many resources for that kind of company.
Solutions like VEEAM are hard to justify.
Veritas NetBackup, while sporting much of the same feature set as Data Protector, does not have any compelling feature for my company to switch to it.
View full review »We viewed several things. We initially started off with Backup Exec, and then we had a homegrown thing which didn't work. This tool and Backup Exec will only run when you tell them to. We were frustrated with that because the engineers, being engineers, don't care. They just want their data and they want it now.
You can't do that in a backup environment. You have to plan, schedule, tell it what and when to monitor. We went forward with that. The only thing that even came close to doing what we wanted was Data Protector. So that is what we purchased.
We proved the tool as follows. We took quite a few of the senior management and told them we are going to stage a real-life crisis, without the rest of the staff knowing. We just turned the storage off. Everybody screamed and we asked, "Who needs what? What do you need? When do you need it?” We starting using the Data Protector service and we retrieved what they wanted. It took us two hours, but that two hours proved the point that Data Protector was the tool for us.
SJ
StevenJamal
Enterprise Engineer at Computech Limited
Commvault is an enterprise backup solution that does both virtualization, on-premise, and cloud and also does outside replication.
View full review »In the past, I used EMC Networker and Veritas Netbackup and I switched to HPE Data Protector for business needs.
View full review »JW
VirtualizationSysAdmin415
Virtualization Systems Administrator at a university with 10,001+ employees
We used Tivoli and it did not work well in our environment. Data Protector was cheaper and would do what we needed to do.
View full review »NH
Nigel Hobden
Director at Random Group Ltd
We also use Acronis Backup, but it's hard for me to compare because I don't have as much experience with Acronis relative to Data Protector. It's also one of those difficult situations because we haven't really pushed Data Protector to its limits. It has a lot of functionality that we don't use. We tend to use more of Acronis' functionality, so it would be unfair to compare them.
I have some experience with NetBackup. It was more stable, user-friendly, and had the best support. However, the decision makers decided that Micro Focus Data Protector was the better way to go, and we had to switch.
View full review »So I went from the Omni Backup to HP Data Protector to Micro Focus Data Protector. I have seen all three transition products. They have stopped developing. I don't know why that happened.
View full review »In autumn 2012, we had two important backup issues in our enterprise data centres. The organisation was about to deploy MS Exchange as our corporate email system, (replacing Novell GroupWise) and our portfolio of VMware guests was increasing. We needed MS Exchange integration and NDMP backup capabilities to meet our data centre backup needs. At that time our IS organisation had a split between remote sites, (divisions) and the enterprise server data centres. We used Symantec NetBackup in our Data Centres and Symantec Backup Exec in divisions to meet our backup requirements.
The cost to license Symantec NetBackup for MS Exchange and NDMP was too large. So, we looked for alternatives. I had used HP Data Protector in a previous organisations and I knew it was a cost effective drop in replacement for NetBackup. So we looked at HP Data Protector and EMC offerings and eventually chose HP Data Protector and cost and functionality. This is just for the enterprise/data centre environment. Data Protector did all we wanted for our data centre backups.
As stated earlier, our technical IS had two teams/areas, data centre and divisions, (remote sites/hospital). The divisional team supported site based infrastructure and local services, (file & print etc.). The divisional servers were backed up using Symantec Backup Exec, and following an upgrade to Backup Exec 2012 we had several critical issues with backup at our divisions and the team evaluated HP Data Protector as replacement for Symantec Backup Exec and selected HP Data Protector.
View full review »XT
reviewer1087419
Backup Administrator Individual Contributor at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Previously, we used Veritas Backup Exec. So, compared to Veritas Backup Execs, it's a little bit cheaper.
View full review »AD
Arnel Damasin
Datacenter Engineer at Al Ittefaq Steel Products Company
We have had backup solutions before, with another vendor, before we started with this solution in 2007
View full review »Since I have been working in my company, we have been using this software.
View full review »We previously used Backup Express and Alexandria. They were both file products. One lacked the breadth and depth of source compatibility, and the other had almost insurmountable configuration implementation issues.
View full review »We were using NetBackup. Although it has more features, we switched to this tool because it has single integration and single support.
View full review »We were using EMC previously, and switched because this is easier to manage and it's cheaper.
View full review »We went with HP for their solution from the beginning. Since most of our hardware is HP, we decided to use them for this solution as well.
View full review »For the projects I support, I used Data Protector. Other projects used BackupExec. However; Backup Exec is very limited of what it can support in filesystem types and even operating system support matrix.
View full review »OZ
Ola Zaher
Infrastructure Section Head at Citystars Properties
Before this solution, we were using a Linux platform and we were using an open-source program, I don't remember the name. We switched from Linux to Microsoft.
This was the first backup and recovery solution.
View full review »At various companies that I've worked for, I've used different backup solutions. I've used Veritas NetBackup and Backup Exec. That was a proprietary backup. They're the two main ones that I've used recently.
The most important criteria to me when selecting a certain vendor is not so much the vendor as the product itself.
View full review »We switched because of company policy, the tapes aged, etc.
View full review »We currently also use NetBackup and Veritas which are both more open to other systems. There is also the Veritas fast solution for appliances together with the pro. With Micro Focus, you need to contact the vendor for equipment for the storage device, and for the new servers and the physical middle servers. NetBackup and Veritas only have one vendor and we get everything from them. It makes it easier to prepare bonds and to design a solution for customers. Veritas also has integration for cloud-native backup, and we have integration for the backup storage before the middle server. There is also good integration with VMware and Data Protector. Micro Focus is not like that. We need three different vendors to provide the same solution.
View full review »AS
Abuzaid Saad
Head, IT Network, Security & Data Center at ARABSAT
Data Protector was our original solution. It shipped with our HP Printer.
View full review »Most of the backups were executed by scripts. We switched because it was hard to oversee all the different backups on each machine which also made reporting difficult to handle.
View full review »We have always used Data Protector in our organization.
View full review »Five years ago, we had another solution, but I forgot the name. It didn’t perform well. That’s why we switched to Data Protector.
What is good for us when we use a vendor like HPE, they can help us find different solutions in different ways. For example, we have the storage system from HPE, and the server systems, and the backups solutions. So it's a combination of everything together; and we have the central person in contact with HPE if we have any problems or need to escalate something.
View full review »I haven't used any other products on such a large scale.
View full review »I’m a consultant and have used many different backup solutions. Since we are an HP reseller, we tend to favor Data Protector. However, I must say, other solutions in the industry do a much better job in certain areas.
View full review »We have used this solution for 10 years now, but our staff has used other solutions in previous roles elsewhere.
View full review »We needed to move towards a new system because of the complexity in the environment. We were looking for ease of use.
View full review »We were already using it when I came to the company. I was more involved in the decision to upgrade.
View full review »We previously used Tivoli Storage Manager, which was similar in complexity to Data Protector but less reliable. Tivoli required daily care and attention to keep it running. Data Protector, while imperfect, is significantly more reliable than Tivoli was for us.
View full review »We previously used CA Arcserve.
View full review »PR
reviewer1300608
Operations Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 1-10 employees
I have used StorONE solution before.
View full review »I used IBM Spectrum Protect for over five years. The company switched because the licensing costs were large.
View full review »I have used Veritas and Veeam Backup & Replication.
View full review »No, but we are actively looking for a solution that will put us in the next century. Personally, I believe that v9 combined with dedupe and 3PAR would be a good solution, but it still can't compete with the appliance from Unitrends with backup, storage and deduplication all-in-one.
View full review »ZC
Zied Chelbi
Project Engineer at Tunelec
I didn't previously use a different solution.
View full review »We have not used any other solution and started off with Data Protector. Our company started using Data Protector from day one, as it was a free solution.
View full review »We have a lot of customers who migrated to Data Protector. The main motive was cost X benefit of the solution. Data Protector is a simple software with a very huge potential to attend to mid-high businesses.
View full review »In the past we used the different manual operating system approach. We also used Symantec Backup Exec System Recovery to backup Windows images and files. Our schema is a specific tool for OS system images (Symantec Backup Exec System Recovery for Windows OS, to do net recovery for HP Unix OS) and Data Protector for the data.
View full review »I haven't migrated a customer with different solution to Data Protector, but I have seen a customer move from Data Protector to Avamar, Veeam, and Commvault, who had better product offerings.
View full review »We used a previous solution and we switched to HP Data Protector based on our partner's recommendation.
View full review »We used Arcserve 2000, and switched because Data Protector is more reliable and the licensing options are better.
View full review »No previous solution was used.
View full review »No previous solution was used.
View full review »We have always been using Data Protector.
View full review »We just used NTBackup.
View full review »I have used others – nothing is perfect.
View full review »I've only used Data Protector.
View full review »We switched because we needed to backup DB2 and HP-UX.
View full review »We had the previous version, and since our service was growing, we needed an extra. So we got this one.
View full review »No previous solution was used.
View full review »I was using a different solution previously and switched because I went to a new company and a new environment.
View full review »We did, and we switched because of the usability and scalability.
View full review »I used Backup Exec in a previous position. I only switched solutions because I changed changed jobs, and my current company uses Data Protector.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText Data Protector
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Data Protector. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.