Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Room for Improvement

Rune Midtvedt
Senior Consultant at a software R&D company with 5,001-10,000 employees
One thing that always fails at our company is that after you have checked in an application then it usually crashes in some way. You get some strange error message. We found out you can open the test you have set up and usually, it works without the error the second time. So you just close the application test and open it again, and then it is okay. So that is quite confusing if you are new to the product, but you do not care about the inconvenience or even notice it after using the tool for a while. It does not seem very professional and it is really a buggy behavior that should be fixed. One feature I would like to see included in the next release of Performance Center would be to be able to run more fluidly with True Client so you could put more virtual users in Performance Center. That would help. I'm not sure how easy it is to compile something like that, but it would be valuable. View full review »
Lloyd Witt
Managed Services Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
When you are looking at what areas of the product have room for improvement, it depends on the various clients that you have and when the new operating systems come out. It can get interesting. It would be nice to know how much GPU memory we are using because the data points are not there or it's hard to read. Also, it would nice to know what the network saturation levels are. It doesn't do that, although that is not what it was designed to do. We use it with another tool that can gather that information and provide us with the data points. View full review »
RajaRao
Associate at a software R&D company with 10,001+ employees
The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools. The stability in some of the latest versions has not been ideal. They need to work to fix it so that it becomes reliably stable again. The cloud solution of LoadRunner is not user-friendly when compared to BlazeMeter. They need to improve their cloud offering in order to compete. It also shouldn't be a standalone tool. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JeanSOCHA
Architecte principal at Cimpa
Some features could sometimes disappear without reason. It's extremely recommended to take time to evaluates newer versions before upgrading. View full review »
Mounika Gollapalli
Performance Tester at Tech Mahindra
* Monitoring tools which are available in Performance Center. * More real-time monitoring should be available for the system under test. * Dashboard creation should be implemented, so we can get the results in a desired format. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.