Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional Other Solutions Considered

QAmgr9845
QA Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We evaluated JMeter and LoadRunner together to form the selection process. For some scenarios we can use LoadRunner for specification road testing, while for other types of testing we prefer JMeter. View full review »
Desil Ponnatt
Technical Leader at Valtech
At that time it was Silk Performer vs. LoadRunner, and Silk Performer was not optimal enough in terms of its features. We were having a lot of issues trying to create our scripts using Silk Performer and latched upon LoadRunner. We found out that LoadRunner has got a lot more features than Silk Performer and was able to cover the tasks. View full review »
NirdeshPachoriya
Senior Architecht at a software R&D company with 5,001-10,000 employees
NeoLoad was one of the options that we considered, but we ultimately went with LoadRunner. View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
418,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.