Over the last five years, I did not have any crashes with LoadRunner or load generators. I remember in 2013 or 2014, there were a few crashes of LoadRunner.

It's pretty stable. We didn't have any issues with stability. 

It is pretty stable. Issues arise only when a patch or something comes back.

It's stable, but in the newest version, it takes about six months till we can guarantee the stability.

It demonstrates exceptional stability and reliability. I would rate it ten out of ten. 

OpenText LoadRunner Professional is a stable solution.

LoadRunner Professional's performance has been good, and we've had no issues with stability.

The solution is very stable. 

We have not had any stability issues with the product so far.

I would rate Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional's stability at eight out of ten.

LoadRunner is standalone. It doesn't rely on anything. There are three components. We are using a controller and analysis instead of a controller. We design a script and run it in the controller. In analysis, we do the reporting and analysis, but instead of a controller, we have the option called performance center, where we can run the script like the controller. However, the controller is a standard Windows-based application. If you choose the performance center, any number of people can access it at the same time.

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. It gets good support from Micro Focus teams. I'd rate the stability 8.5 to nine out of ten in terms of reliability. 

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is a stable solution. 

We did not have any issues with the stability, or the performance of this solution.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is 100 percent stable.

I would rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten.

The solution is stable.

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs, glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

We have had no significant issues with stability or performance.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is stable although we sometimes face issues in developing scripts but it's a problem that can be easily reverified and edited.

This is a stable product - I've dealt with it over the past 15 years and it's stable.

It's such a mature product. It's been out there for a very long time. It has come a long way. It's extremely stable in the sense that I can approach the technical support, as an example. It is because we ran into some challenges with program scripting or something, but generally not because of the application crashing. I'd list my experience with LoadRunner as it being a very stable product.

The tool is stable.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is a stable solution.

I believe it's good. When it first started I didn't realize it was so good, but over the years I'm seeing that it's getting more and more stable. It looks like HP is putting some efforts to make it more stable.

This solution is very stable. We use it very frequently.

We've had no issues with the stability.

No, the application is very robust. The only time issues are experienced is when it is running for extra-long period soak tests, e.g. for 24 hours. Then, only on odd occasions, does the system sometimes experience issues with results files, which become corrupt. Usually this is because of issues during the test with the AUT causing very large results files being generated.

We didn't see any challenge with this product at all.

It's a stable solution. In the ten years that we have been using it, I have only had an issue once.  We had an issue with the protocol where it didn't support the job. We contacted support.

This is a really stable tool. We haven't had issues with bugs or glitches. It hasn't crashed on us. We've been satisfied with the level of stability it provides.

Stability has been an issue. It has really been a big problem for us with Performance Center in particular. Crashing or exiting during collation is not acceptable.   

The stability of the solution is mostly good. The only thing is that we used a distributor to fix the problems when something went wrong at one point. If it was working out well, the results of that thing would still give you wrong results. So the distributor is not really good with problems, but the local setup is good with no problems.

The solution is quite stable. I've seen a few bugs of course - they will always be there. That's not a big deal and I just work around it. 

The stability on the old versions is good. On the newer versions, the bleeding edge is still being worked on.

I didn't have many stability issues. The tool is very stable as you just need to check what protocols you want to test.

LoadRunner Professional is quite stable.

Its a complex product and there are usually a few bugs in the point zero releases, it is generally pretty reliable.

Sometimes the controller can crash, this is usually after opening and closing several scenarios without closing the controller. Closing the controller after a couple of scenarios opened will avoid the problem.

The stability is good.

It's very stable.

We haven't encountered any stability issues.

To be frank, the earlier version (graded I-5 and graded I-6) was very bad for me. I had a really bad experience on that version. 

One of the problems we had was that one of the scripts that we used to create worked and then there were some bugs that were coming out runtime support. 

The recent version runs well, and actually, LoadRunner has removed those bugs. It's been a good experience.

it's stable. It's been around for a long time. There are no real issues, no defects or anything.

The product is very stable.

Stability depends on what happens during a test. Generally, LoadRunner is quite stable, but sometimes when a test is running, the system will abort it prior to completion even though the results are still accessible.

It also depends on what you want to do with LoadRunner. If you have your own application and you want to load test it, then LoadRunner works fine. But if, like us, you work with customers' applications, you may need more functionalities which LoadRunner may not have.

We use LoadRunner on a daily basis and it is good.

The solution is stable and the only compatibility issues lie within the screens. I think there should be an improvement to the compatibility to both laptop and desktop screens. Sometimes we are not be able to click on some of the buttons due to the screen mismatching and compatibility issues. 

We've had no issues with stability.

I have found some stability issues for one of the website. After a number of concurrent users, the web server was unable to handle the load.

The stability: It's the best part of the LoadRunner platform.

The stability of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is very high. It is the leading tool for stability.

The solution is stable.

No.

The stability of the solution is good.

It is stable. It is not always user friendly but it is efficient.

It's quite stable.

No issues encountered.