It is a scalable platform.

A special team is required to work on this product, and not everybody can use it. Less than 100 people use this solution, and the network teams are the main users.

I'm very satisfied with the scalability because for scalability purposes we don't need to buy multiple hardware. If you install one node on Network Node Manager and want to scale it up, it's pretty easy to create more nodes. 

The product is scalable and can be pre-defined during deployment. It can also be scaled and enhanced later. If you take precautions and take into consideration what your needs will be in two or three years, the setups can be predefined and save you time. It could be done later but there would be an additional cost.  

The solution is not very scalable. We previously used the 10.0 version and it was a hassle. In fact, the vendor was unable to upgrade us directly to 2022.11 so they had to upload what was on 10.0 to the new version. 

The scalability is rated a seven out of ten. 

From the network management side, scalability is good. From a performance side, it is very bad. It doesn't support the building of a Sybase database. It has limitations on the number of connections. It is limiting because it slows down after only 30 connections. Even the HPE lab personnel came to our site and they agreed that the solution cannot support all of these connections. We have implemented another solution to take the data out from that database and put it in another one. This is a big limitation.

From the very beginning until now, we deployed to two servers in a fail over environment. Therefore, I can't really speak to the scalability of the product.

No issues in tools.

I think we shouldn't necessarily confuse usability, per se, with robustness or scale. That's something NNMi definitely goes ahead and gives us. I've heard it's really scalable. NNMi has been there, done that, for so long with very large, very complex enterprises at the kind of scale that we're talking about. I think I'm okay with usability.

The scalability is great. 

It is a scalable product. 

We are a quite large organization. we have more than 120,000 employees. In terms of the scalability, we have experienced no issues. As an organization, we consist of more than 120,000 people. The end users of NNMi are less, i.e., probably around 50 – 60 end users. The network operations team is the end-user for the NNMi and we still have had no issues with the scalability.

We have a large enterprise and a large network. We've had no problems regarding scalability.

I can't really comment about scalability. Our company is a little bit stable, in the sense that the company hasn't grown much. We don't necessarily have too much control over what we can do because most things are regulated from outside the company. So getting to do new things is a little bit of a challenge for us.

No

Scalability is actually one of the reasons why we picked Node Manager. With one instance you can monitor from a couple of hundreds up to several thousands of devices. So it's very good.

We have had no problems with scalability for our infrastructure and our dimensions.

No.

It provides very good scalability from 200 nodes to 30,000 nodes and from 2,500 interfaces to 60,000 interfaces.

None that I noticed.