OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Other Solutions Considered
DP
User: 767278
Cloud Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I did a PoC with other tools such as Flood, NeoLoad, and BlazeMeter. In my company, we are supporting multiple protocols testing. For web and API testing, any tool is good, but when it comes to RDP and Citrix protocols, LoadRunner is at the top in the market for supporting all different protocols.
View full review »PH
reviewer2297850
Performance & Analytics Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We did a complete RFP process with multiple vendors with an open mind, but LoadRunner did win the process. We looked at BlazeMeter and k6. LoadRunner stood out in terms of features and the protocols it supported. It had the most features and the largest protocol support. The other vendors have not caught up yet. I know they are working on it, but LoadRunner has got that advantage right now. Others are behind on protocols.
With all the vendors, we sat down for a long three-hour demo and did a day in the life. We showed them what we do with Silk Performer and asked them to show us how we would do this in their tool. LoadRunner won hands down. It was obviously not the same, but they could reproduce almost everything. It is a better tool. With other tools, we found big gaps. k6 had some gaps, and BlazeMeter had some gaps. They are not bad tools, but for what my team does, they would have handicapped us.
View full review »There are other tools that provide the cloud capabilities and key features that LoadRunner has, but LoadRunner‘s brand and trustworthiness are more important to me.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText LoadRunner Cloud. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AB
Allan Beumer
Lead Performance Test Engineer at bol.com BV
We tried Neoload and looked at JMeter. We chose LoadRunner because that was the only performance testing tool that had something like TruClient.
We have looked into other tools and find that this tool, although expensive, has many useful features.
View full review »MD
Michael Daniel
Sr. Technical Test Analyst at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees
I have extensively used JMeter as a performance testing tool. JMeter is free and also enables codeless scripting. Even without coding you can try running scripts. But where there is no comparison between JMeter and LoadRunner is when it comes to distributing load. LoadRunner stands out. With JMeter, it's very difficult to distribute the load.
When it comes to creating reports, Loadrunner is best. You will spend most of your time analyzing what's happened with the test, analyzing bottlenecks and pain points with the performance parameters. But in JMeter, you have to manually collect everything: collate the results and produce the reports. Then you need to do a detailed analysis to find the bottlenecks and resource patterns. It is very difficult, but it's free. If you have the skill set and the time, you can use JMeter. But if you are time-constrained, and you want to actually concentrate on performance testing, use LoadRunner.
LoadRunner Cloud provides application performance and management tools to an extent, but not to the extent of New Relic or Splunk. We predominantly use New Relic to monitor application performance and in some cases we use Dynatrace as well. But LoadRunner Cloud doesn't have complete application performance monitoring metrics.
View full review »AK
Aditya Kattamuri
Senior Performance Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
The other product we considered was BlazeMeter. We eventually chose StormRunner. I think only those two are pretty much in the market - nothing else.
View full review »Not really because we're mostly an HPE shop and this was working with HPE they to meet our needs, so they provided this and it's worked out great.
View full review »We have evaluated HP StormRunner Load against other market competitors that include Blazemeter, SOASTA’s Cloud Test, NeoLOAD, VSTS, Load Complete and StressStimulus.
View full review »I'm an HPE partner. I don't look anywhere else.
View full review »There were no other solutions evaluated.
View full review »We compared it to LoadRunner and Performance Center because we use that currently for load and performance tests. We cannot use this solution in the cloud. StormRunner is very rudimentary at this time, but it's a great concept. We hope that it will be thrilling.
We chose StormRunner because of the cloud. That's a great part of it.
We evaluate a lot of testing tools. NeoLoad, LoadRunner, we prefer HP.
View full review »No, this was my first choice.
View full review »We chose this one because of the name. It's established, the last decade. We used to be with this company. Micro Focus is more than seven or eight years, we're good with them, they are good with us.
View full review »Looked briefly at Neotys…actively doing a POC of CloudTest for comparison purposes.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText LoadRunner Cloud. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.