It's used for monitoring all of our internal URLs, certificate expiration dates, as well as database connectivity, database queries, and internal URL availability.

Our customers use Micro Focus SiteScope mainly for infrastructure monitoring, but it is also capable of application and database monitoring.

The primary use case is for monitoring the infrastructure and Applications performance and availability.

Basically we're  monitoring the   Servers Resources (CPU , Memory , Network , Disks) and we're Monitoring the Availability of our Servers through Ping.

the most valuable feature we're using is  Monitoring the Urls and APis Web Services and we can configure a Business transaction for monitoring a group of Web Services or specific Workflow

Also We're  monitoring the important Services for proactively tracking the services status  and getting alerts if any application service Down.

also we're using the  SiteScope For monitoring the  company's logs, script files,so we will get Alerts if a specific Keywords  or Errors are existing on this Logs.

 also we're using the SiteScope For monitoring the  Network Services and network Bandwidth utilization through SNMP  

the Sitescoep has a predefined solutions templates which contains the best practices that can be easy applied for monitoring Databases , Active Directory , VM Ware Environment , Microsoft Exchange, iis , tomcat and a lot.

Our organization is focused on performance testing and we use a variety of tools for this purpose, both open-source and enterprise. We are consultants and we use these tools for our customers.

This solution is being used for infrastructure monitoring. It lets us know what might be going wrong when we subject the application to a higher load. It gives us a fair view.

It is a dockerized application where we use SiteScope to give the application performance management.

I have used SiteScope for over 10 years as a synthetic monitor for everything under the sun. 

We use the solution for agentless monitoring of network and systems infrastructure including Linux and Windows, multiple versions, and multiple "flavors".

The primary use case is for meeting the needs of basic level monitoring of multiple devices across a single-site network. 

When accompanied by APM tools from the Micro Focus stable, Sitescope provides a useful "bottom-up" (technology --> Application) view of performance and availability. Other APM tools provide a "top-down" (i.e. a user-centric view) of performance and availability. 

Completely agentless solution, i.e., no agent has to be installed on any services for monitoring, hence avoiding any troubleshooting of agents.

The solution is primarily used for monitoring the servers, log files, and network devices.

We use the tool for database queries of specific thresholds. 

The main use case is basic infrastructure monitoring.

We are using the solution for many things.

Our company manages four different city hospital environments and all of them have SiteScope but each uses a different version depending on how long ago the product was implemented. We're a government organization. 

We use and manage SiteScope monitoring tools in our different projects. Each project has different kinds and numbers of users. For example, one has 2,300 users, but normally we use SiteScope for the servers. Physical and virtual. SiteScope monitors 200 virtual servers in one of our projects. I'm a managed services manager and we're a customer of SiteScope.

We use SiteScope for monitoring of our production systems, system resources, and also some application monitoring.