We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is the #24 ranked solution in our list of APM tools. It is most often compared to Dynatrace: Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope vs Dynatrace

What is Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
SiteScope is an agentless application monitoring software that provides heterogeneous and hybrid support, quick time to value, and ease of installation, configuration, and use.

Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is also known as Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope.

Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Buyer's Guide

Download the Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: October 2021

Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Customers
Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Video

Archived Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Reviews (more than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Hani Khalil
Service Assurance , Senior Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
A solution with a very good interface, an easy initial setup and good scalability

Pros and Cons

  • "There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server."
  • "Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test."

What is our primary use case?

We are using the solution for many things.

What is most valuable?

There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server.

The interface is good. It's great for our technical team.

What needs improvement?

Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test. We have some cases where we need to monitor the vCenters and the whole ESXi, available under this, and VMs. It may impact the server if you don't have the required experience.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is normally stable, but in some environments, it's a bit more complex. For example, in our environment, we have more than 80 services published to the customers. Every day we have new items and new technologies. We have tests to retest, so sometimes when they move to new release, SiteScope itself will not work on it. You need to go to another release or wait for the R&D to provide you with a fix.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is good, but not perfect.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. It's really simple.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend the product. I would suggest that those considering implementation of the solution need to study their environment first. You need to know what you're going to do before installing SiteScope. Everything needs to be prepared. Communication metrics should be ready. If your communication metrics are not ready, then SiteScope will not work with you. Once you do, however, it will be a piece of cake. Just install it and install the mutation.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Carl Brahms Jr
Engineer at United Airlines
Real User
The GUI is cumbersome, and it requires a Java client

Pros and Cons

  • "The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily."
  • "They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files."

What is our primary use case?

I have used SiteScope for over 10 years as a synthetic monitor for everything under the sun. 

How has it helped my organization?

The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily.  

We ended up using the "script" monitor the most, because the canned monitors didn't always do what we needed. It was easy enough to use, and the ability to use regex to monitor output in alerts and thresholds made the product very configurable.

What is most valuable?

For host monitoring, agentless monitoring requires no installs or special permissions, just a regular user account on the host and firewall access to SSH, WMI, NetBIOS, etc.  

DBQuery, URL, and Web Service monitoring were also valuable until we started using another tool for real transaction monitoring. Now, we rarely need to setup synthetic monitoring for applications, because we have actual user performance data.

What needs improvement?

It was a great tool for a long time. My go-to tool for everything. However, something happened at HPE years ago and investment in the development of the tool seems to have tanked.  

They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files, and the licensing is way more expensive than other tools that do the same thing (like LogicMonitor). Monitors have bugs that sit unfixed for multiple versions (file age and SOAP/XML Web Service monitors). The GUI is cumbersome, and it requires a Java client!  

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Yes, some conditions trigger false alerts which is pretty difficult to recover from. The worst thing you can hear is that every monitor is opening a ticket from one server. Another admin built flood limits on the alert receiver side to prevent this issue from creating too many tickets to handle.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I did not see many issues with scalability which did not involve host infrastructure limits.

How are customer service and technical support?

There are some very capable HPE/Micro Focus engineers on the forums, but overall opening a ticket was usually a waste of time for us. Most of the time we would have to figure out the problem ourselves through debug logging. Often, we would have to restore from a backup, in the event the monitor database would get corrupted.

How was the initial setup?

Easy to setup and teach other teammates how to create monitors, templates, etc.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented using an in-house team.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Easy to setup, but I’m not able to recommend this product any longer because there hasn’t been any real investment in enhancements that allow for cloud or container monitoring.   Apparently they no longer charge for solution templates and I’m not sure how they price the tool.  They’ve changed it over the years from “points”, metrics, and monitor count.  Not sure how they are selling this tool these days unless it’s to customers looking for an agentless onprem tool with no need to monitor new technologies.  

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Learn what your peers think about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2021.
542,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Rakesh Kanojia
Senior Technical Pre-Sales Consultant / Project Manager (BSM) at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Top 20
It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates

Pros and Cons

  • "SiteScope has built-in flat file DB, hence it removes the dependency of an external DB for higher stability."
  • "Has a simple setup. It can be up and running within hours."
  • "It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates."
  • "Direct integration with an SMS gateway for sending critical alerts to the support SME. This will help customer investing in third party middleware solutions for SMS."

What is our primary use case?

Completely agentless solution, i.e., no agent has to be installed on any services for monitoring, hence avoiding any troubleshooting of agents.

How has it helped my organization?

SiteScope is a very flexible solution. The organization where I have implemented this solution allowed us to create custom monitoring to suite the environment. When coupled with OMi and Service Manager, it gives a 360 degree view of the service availability and performance SLAs.

What is most valuable?

SiteScope supports several virtualization technologies (private and public), like AWS, Hyper-V, VMware, etc., without the installation of any extra modules. The dashboard is tablet friendly and supported anywhere on iOS and Android.

It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates (policies). Most importantly, one can even use SiteScope for monitoring application transactions recorded using Vugen.

Finally, SiteScope is available as a container for Docker, which is parts away from the installation & length upgrade procedure.

What needs improvement?

Direct integration with an SMS gateway for sending critical alerts to the support SME. This will help customer investing in third party middleware solutions for SMS.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No. SiteScope has built-in flat file DB, hence it removes the dependency of an external DB for higher stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No. SiteScope is highly scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

The support is good. Most importantly, the documentation is well-organized.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Depending on the requirement, we do recommend an agent-based solution. However, our overall first choice is SiteScope.

How was the initial setup?

Has a simple setup. It can be up and running within hours.

What about the implementation team?

I have implemented the solution myself for several organisations.

What was our ROI?

Not applicable.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing.

For the first time users, it is recommended to make use of the experienced service provided for initial setup as they bring in experience and best practices.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No.

What other advice do I have?

Go with a small install base (architecture) and gradually scale the solution.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PankajSoni
Sr. Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Consultant
Top 20Leaderboard
​Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware

What is most valuable?

Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware. Its dashboard is really good.

What needs improvement?

Complexity in template editing  They should provide more templates for new vendor devices.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues with the tools.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

It fully depends on the costs, customer, and architect.

How was the initial setup?

It was straightforward.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It depends on what the customer wants.

What other advice do I have?

Before choosing a product, I want to evaluate to check all the requirements.…

What is most valuable?

Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware. Its dashboard is really good.

What needs improvement?

  • Complexity in template editing 
  • They should provide more templates for new vendor devices.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues with the tools.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

It fully depends on the costs, customer, and architect.

How was the initial setup?

It was straightforward.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It depends on what the customer wants.

What other advice do I have?

Before choosing a product, I want to evaluate to check all the requirements. Then, before implementation, check all the customer requirements accordingly. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Diego Caicedo Lescano
Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP. Any device with any of these protocols will be monitored.

Pros and Cons

  • "Simple deployment: The deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP, which means that any device with any of these protocols will be monitored."
  • "It could be more reliable using a database repository instead of a log repository."

How has it helped my organization?

  • Proactive monitoring based on real experience
  • Configuring thresholds for warning events for proactive monitoring and actioning

What is most valuable?

Simple deployment: The deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP, which means that any device with any of these protocols will be monitored.

Great monitoring capabilities:  The monitoring capabilities have no limit; whatever you can imagine, you can monitor, even using URL monitors, database query monitors, and formula composite monitors, which are not common in other tools.

Reporting:  You have a lot of reports using different criteria - for example, dates, filters, events, and status - which let you analyze the monitored data, convert it into information and take actions.

Event-based actions: You can simply send an e-mail or take actions like restart the server, restart the service, etc.

Agentless Monitoring

Dynamic Monitoring

Dockers Monitoring

Dependency Configuration

What needs improvement?

Even though the log system is reliable, the tool must have a database. It could be more reliable using a database repository instead of a log repository. It could even improve performance and the ability for generating cross-domain reporting for better governance.

What other advice do I have?

It has a wide variety of preconfigured monitors, and great capability for monitoring whatever you wish, including configuring formulas for monitoring.

It is an agentless tool, and very easy to implement. For better performance, try to use another disk different than the OS.

Configure HP SiteScope Restart option for releasing HW resources.

Use of Regular Expressions (regex) is a valuable feature

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
ITCS user
IT Administrator with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
It has a lot of common API's out of the box, and this saves coding and maintaining these interfaces.

Pros and Cons

  • "It's easy to template standard monitoring configurations, and automate monitoring configuration."
  • "Full application functionality available via the API. There are some functions you can perform managing monitors, that are only available through the UI."

Improvements to My Organization

SiteScope is deployed on our network perimeter, and gives our operations teams an end user perspective of service availability. In the past, we'd get caught up in the old silo arguments. - the server looks fine, must be the network - the network looks fine, must be the applications etc. now with SiteScope, we can show the ops teams that there is a problem from the client perspective, and SiteScope can help determine root cause.

Valuable Features

We use this product for monitoring client user experience. It's easy to template standard monitoring configurations, and automate monitoring configuration. (NOTE: there is some missing functionality in API's). SiteScope has a lot of common API's out of the box, and this saves coding and maintaining these interfaces.

Room for Improvement

Full application functionality available via the API. There are some functions you can perform managing monitors, that are only available through the UI.

Version 11.2X: Within the SiS GUI, you can individually add remote servers, and then configure multiple monitors to use this remote server. Via the API, this is not possible. You must use a template to create both the remote server and monitor. If you need to configure another monitor to use the same remote server, it became problematic. The API also has no ability to configure the stored credentials, and so on and so on. Basically, full automation of the SiS config is not possible, even using HP tools like HP Operations Orchestration, as the application, as I said, does not allow full configuration of monitor components via the API.

There are now subsequent versions released, and I have looked at the API updates included in these.

Stability Issues

We have some ongoing stability issues, specifically with SiteScope monitoring Windows servers via SSH, connecting to OpenSSH. There appears to be a compatibility issue with the SSH client deployed with SiteScope, that causes SiteScope to leave a stable connection open, and eventually SiteScope runs out of resources.

Customer Service and Technical Support

I only deal with HP support, so cannot compare to other vendors. I will say, over the past 12 - 18 months, I'm assuming due to HP's multiple splits and cost cutting, and their attempts to be a somewhat agile software provider, the overall quality of code and documentation has fallen.

Initial Setup

The initial deployment was easy and quick. Ongoing management and hardening can present some challenges, but no show stoppers.

If you read the manual it is quite straightforward and enables you to get a quick ROI. Full hardening and automation can present some challenges, but none insurmountable.

Pricing, Setup Cost and Licensing

Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model. Points are consumed simply by number of monitors deployed, so if you are wanting to do end user or application monitoring, you want this one. Endpoint licensing is best suited if you don't have a monitoring solution, and want SiteScope to be your agentless monitor. This way, you can deploy any number of monitors at the one server (e.g. CPU, memory, disc, event log) and if they all share the one remote connections, that's one license. As opposed to the point license, where each check (CPU, memory, disc) is a point.

Other Solutions Considered

As far as agentless monitoring goes, we did paper based reviews of other products, but never PoCs. SiteScope was chosen as we required a supported solution, and obtained entitlements and discounts due to our relationship with HP.

Other Advice

Most answer are found in the manual except for licensing, which you'll need to contact HP for. There is also the SiteScope Community edition I believe, which allows you to use the product for free to test it, but, from memory, limits you to 100 monitors I think.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
it_user486648
Technical Engineer Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
It's lightweight, and able to address gaps in our other monitoring tools.

Pros and Cons

  • "It's a very flexible product so you can run a script out of it, even straight out of the box."
  • "More out of the box Cloud integration and capabilities."

How has it helped my organization?

Quicker time to meet the requirements of our customer. Because it's agentless as opposed to install and manage agents, we're just focused on what monitors we need and getting those deployed.

What is most valuable?

It's lightweight, and its ability to address numerous gaps in our other monitoring tools. It's a very flexible product so you can run a script out of it, even straight out of the box. Unlike other tools, you can write a script, run it, and integrate it. It's another monitoring tool and also gives the customers, on demand, the ability to pull or have the monitors go out and interrogate the system and validate the health of the system on demand.

What needs improvement?

More out of the box Cloud integration and capabilities. Currently there's one for Amazon. There's numerous other platforms like, MS Office 365, Exchange or IBM. I haven't seen one for HPE. Those capabilities are solutions to where they're just ready to go.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have had no issues with the stability.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have not personally used it so I can't speak to it. My own experiences with most of them is that they're OK. They're probably above or below average.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We went away from SiteScope many years ago and came back because of its simplicity. In the interim we switched to some of the IBM product lines. SiteScope is very intuitive and we've been able to accomplish what we want very quickly and efficiently compared to IBM.

How was the initial setup?

From my perspective right now, it seems fairly simple or straightforward. Most of it we had up and running in a couple hours. We spent more time trying to fulfill our own requirements. The only gap or complexity we've added is around provisioning of monitors because we're driving it from an automated service catalog.

What other advice do I have?

Don't over think it, it's a simple tool.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
William Linn
Enterprise System Management at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Top 10
It has multiple monitors that can be deployed OOTB, which includes basic system monitors for CPU, Disk, Memory, NIC's, etc.

Pros and Cons

  • "It has multiple monitors that can be deployed OOTB, which includes basic system monitors for CPU, Disk, Memory, NIC's, etc."

    Improvements to My Organization

    It has been used in a wide area of monitoring systems and network devices in my company.

    Valuable Features

    It has multiple monitors that can be deployed OOTB, which includes basic system monitors for CPU, Disk, Memory, NIC's, etc. It does not use an agent, which might tax system resources.

    Room for Improvement

    Licensing is a little steep. 

    SiS, the abbreviated acronym for the tool, used to be owned by another company. You could purchase the product with unlimited monitors for $2500. Since HP's acquisition of the product, licensing is done on a points-per-monitor basis. Each individual monitor costs x number of points, an HP sales rep has those exact numbers, which change, seemingly., at whim! :-) You just get an error that you cannot add more monitors without additional licensing! With OOTB you get a few, not enough though to monitor any numbers in a enterprise. And, with literally hundreds of nodes and application monitors, database, web, etc. available, costs can get steep!

    Stability Issues

    We haven't had any issues with stability.

    Scalability Issues

    We haven't had any issues with scalability.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    it_user364155
    Senior IT Infrastructure Specialist at Nordea
    Vendor
    When we perform testing, it gives us a single client for selecting which monitoring data we want for later analysis of the performance of our systems.

    Pros and Cons

    • "It's integrated with different monitoring tools, such as AppDynamics."
    • "We'd like a uniform interface for monitoring our system, since that's the purpose of SiteScope."

    Improvements to My Organization

    It's a monitoring tool that's deeply integrated with Performance Center. We can put a load on it and see all the information we need. Plus, it's an inexpensive solution.

    Valuable Features

    It's integrated with different monitoring tools, such as AppDynamics. When we perform testing, it gives us a single client for selecting which monitoring data we want for later analysis of the performance of our systems.

    Room for Improvement

    We'd like a uniform interface for monitoring our system, since that's the purpose of SiteScope. I think this would make it a true monitoring tool for the environment.

    Stability Issues

    It just works.

    Scalability Issues

    We're able to scale when necessary.

    Customer Service and Technical Support

    We have not used tech support.

    Other Advice

    We'll probably remove SiteScope shortly because we've been using another monitoring tool in production. SiteScope is just not something we use very much of any more.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Ravi Suvvari
    Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    It provides monitoring of system health and sends email alerts after reaching threshold limits.

    What is most valuable?

    Agentless monitoring Different types of health checks Web-based UI for easy interaction End-to-end monitoring E-mail alert messages along with SMS features

    How has it helped my organization?

    System health check monitoring and email alerts after reaching threshold limits.

    What needs improvement?

    Monitor mobile health status too.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    6 years

    What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

    No

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    No

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    No

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Customer Service: 7/10 Technical Support: 8/10

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    No

    What about the implementation

    What is most valuable?

    • Agentless monitoring
    • Different types of health checks
    • Web-based UI for easy interaction
    • End-to-end monitoring
    • E-mail alert messages along with SMS features

    How has it helped my organization?

    System health check monitoring and email alerts after reaching threshold limits.

    What needs improvement?

    Monitor mobile health status too.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    6 years

    What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

    No

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    No

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    No

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Customer Service:

    7/10

    Technical Support:

    8/10

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    No

    What about the implementation team?

    HP vendor

    What was our ROI?

    100%

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Little expensive

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Splunk and Gomez

    What other advice do I have?

    No

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    it_user43743
    Director Technical Service - Monitoring Engineering at a recruiting/HR firm with 10,001+ employees
    Real User
    It allows us to run queries to deal with different cases, so that we don’t have to go back to HP to open an ER for us.

    What is most valuable?

    The most valuable feature is its ability to do what it’s supposed to do, which is to ensure that you have a wide array of tool-sets to properly monitor your infrastructure. Also, that it’s able to scale properly is valuable.

    How has it helped my organization?

    The products have been able to deliver the service to our business, which is to ensure that the applications that depend on our servers are always available. The business and support teams can be supported properly. We can choose how to use HP’s tools to monitor the changing dynamics of IT technology. Sitescope allows us to run queries to deal with different cases, so that we don’t have to go back to HP to open an ER for us. That’s one of the main things I love about the product.

    What needs improvement?

    I think, what comes to mind, to be able to reliably do more monitoring on a single Sitescope server in a more compact way, with fewer servers, would be an area for improvement. Right now there’s no way to really say that you’ve hit the limit for the server, but that’s important to know.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Every product has its issues, but I think overall it’s stable. It’s never perfect but it’s pretty good.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    I think that the scalability needs to be worked on a bit. We can scale fine horizontally, but we’d like to scale less horizontal and be more compact. HP still has a bit of ways to go to ensure that this happens. I would give it a 6-7/10.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    It depends. When you purchase the product, you have somebody managing your account that always handles your case, which ensures that you get the response from the right tier of service, which we’ve found extremely helpful.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    About nine years ago, they were changing requirements in what we were doing, so we needed to find a solution that could cover as much that we needed.

    How was the initial setup?

    Straightforward and very good.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We also looked at BMC, and IBM. We chose HP because of the pure requirements and matching functionality with the product. I think the key reason why we chose HP is that the solution gives you a tool-set to monitor the technology vs. other products that only gives you a very specific solution that you can only use to monitor one particular technology.

    What other advice do I have?

    You need to ensure that functionality meets the majority of your requirements. Quality or proposed quality of their support as well as their ability to keep ahead of the curve in terms of the technology. But remember there’s no perfect solution – you always apply the 80/20 rule and find the solution that can match your current requirements and anticipate what your future needs are. That’s why we’ve had our product for over nine years now, which shows we did a good job with our selection.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    ITCS user
    Consultant at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
    Vendor
    Easy to use solution but complicated when it comes to details

    Valuable Features:

    Agentless data collection Supporting a big number of monitor metrics

    Room for Improvement:

    May require a dashboard for the data collected

    Deployment Issues:

    Easy to deploy

    Initial Setup:

    Initial setup was straightforward but when it comes to monitors that look deep inside details like an agent data collection solution, too many customizations and scripting is needed.

    Other Solutions Considered:

    HP OM

    Other Advice:

    This solution is a data collection solution. Its added value can't be shown unless you have a clean and clear dashboard to review data collected and correlated

    Valuable Features:

    Agentless data collection Supporting a big number of monitor metrics

    Room for Improvement:

    May require a dashboard for the data collected

    Deployment Issues:

    Easy to deploy

    Initial Setup:

    Initial setup was straightforward but when it comes to monitors that look deep inside details like an agent data collection solution, too many customizations and scripting is needed.

    Other Solutions Considered:

    HP OM

    Other Advice:

    This solution is a data collection solution. Its added value can't be shown unless you have a clean and clear dashboard to review data collected and correlated
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: My company is an HP partner
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.