Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium Competitors and Alternatives

Get our free report covering Okta, CyberArk, SailPoint, and other competitors of Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium competitors and alternatives

reviewer1167474
User
Real User
Aug 15, 2019
Reduces complexity with single sign-on and provides valuable application-usage related metrics

What is our primary use case?

We provide virtual workspaces for small to medium-sized organizations. Because we don't have many service desk employees (and we don't like to do support ;) ), we use HelloID to automate every repetitive task we can imagine. Also, we use HelloID as our SSO solution.

Pros and Cons

  • "The Single Sign-On capabilities are endless and we haven't found a single app so far that couldn't be set up for SSO."
  • "I would like to have the built-in provisioning module improved."

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend following them for the demos and webinars. There is a lot of cool stuff and features which you might not have known about. At this moment, we do not have any wishes. We have submitted a lot of feature requests in the past, but since there is a release every month, all our FRs and nice-to-haves have been implemented. My advice would be to at least use this solution for service automation and access management because that's something you won't regret. Overall, I would recommend HelloID for its ease of use and fair pricing.
reviewer1251801
CEO at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Jan 14, 2020
Good authentication features and good stability

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution for authenticating users on our system and our clients' systems. Not only Google, but also to integrate Google Cloud Identity with other systems such as MDM (Mobile Device Management) solutions, and endpoints — like computers.

Pros and Cons

  • "Although we have not looked at the whole product and explored it completely, we find that all the authentication features that we are using now are valuable."
  • "To improve the product, the integration with third-party products could always be smoother."

What other advice do I have?

It is as good as anything else in the product category. It works just like other products that do the same, like Oracle (Identity Cloud Service) or Microsoft Azure or Okta. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product as maybe about an eight.
reviewer810399
Security Architect at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Nov 17, 2019
Provides login authentication for mobile apps and has good stability

What is our primary use case?

I'm a security architect. The product is used by our customers, not by our company people directly, so I expect we would have several thousand people using this solution.

Pros and Cons

  • "It has improved our organization by providing login authentication for a mobile app."
  • "The product could use a more flexible administration structure"

What other advice do I have?

In terms of advice, I think that if your application is developer-driven, then Auth0 provides extremely good developer support and supports multiple development tools and strategies. That's where I believe the product comes into its own. If you're enterprise, then Okta or Microsoft are probably a better solution. It's worth watching. I would rate this product an eight out of 10.
reviewer1184106
Enterprise Architect at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Jan 23, 2020
Stable with an easy initial setup and good geo sign-on functionality

What is our primary use case?

We have multiple applications that require logins. If when a user is signing on for the first time, they can go to the Oracle Asset Manager's main page where they will need to provide a user ID and password. Then, the corresponding user ID and password would be there and the user's page will be sent a token. If they need to log into other applications, the registry token will be used and the user won't need to log in at that time. So by doing that, we are providing a secure and simple user experience.

Pros and Cons

  • "The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients."
  • "The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality."

What other advice do I have?

We've used both cloud and on-premises deployment models, but have never handled a hybrid deployment model. I'd advise others that, before starting the installation, it's very important to have the proper equipment in place, at a high level. The organization should also have a proper access management strategy considered as well before implementing the solution. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. Overall, it's a very good solution, but its lacking in the mobile area. If the mobile offering was better, I'd rate it higher.
Get our free report covering Okta, CyberArk, SailPoint, and other competitors of Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.