Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing
The pricing model depends on how you use it. There are different tiers of API management: a standard tier, a developer tier, and a premium tier, and each of these tiers will have different features. I think the premium tier can start somewhere around 2000 euros a month.
The developer tier is free to use, but the standard tier could also be around 500 euros a month. So there are solutions that are not that cheap, and the cost would increase with the additional features you want. The more enterprise-level features you go to, the more expensive it gets.
View full review »The licensing cost for Microsoft Azure API Management is publicly available and goes from a developer edition that costs $26 to $30 per month. It may have changed, but it's in the neighborhood of $30 per month. I believe there's also the enterprise edition, which is highly capable and costs $2,500 per month.
If you want to use Microsoft Azure API Management, there are no additional fees. Still, of course, within an enterprise environment, you don't use just Microsoft Azure API Management because you need networking or virtual networks. Still, that comes with the territory because if you want to develop solutions in Azure, you need to buy services, servers, networks, etc. Regarding the usage per se of Microsoft Azure API Management, you don't need to pay anything else. You pay for it if you need it and then have to configure it within the Azure environment. Aside from the standard licensing cost, there are no hidden costs from Microsoft Azure API Management.
Pricing for the solution is competitive, so I'd rate it as six out of ten. If the scale is one to five, it's a three because it's the market average.
View full review »The price is very high. It is very expensive. We have an enterprise agreement. So, every anniversary, we renew.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure API Management
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure API Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The solution comes with a standard license. Its price is one of its drawbacks. Some costs need to be more affordable for us. Frankly, Azure is our most expensive resource; it's costly.
View full review »It's free for less than ten users. If you want to go beyond that, its paid. But when you use all features of Azure its a very cost effective solution.
Costs depend on the size, complexity, usage, and what facility you want to integrate. So, we use Microsoft Azure and have the entire DevOps and Visual Studio on the cloud. We get all enterprise flavor with very optimum cost, when compared to multivendor environment.
View full review »Because of our partner relationship, our pricing is pretty decent. But in general, if I compare pricing, I think the initial offer that we got from Microsoft until the relationship kicked in was more expensive than AWS.
There were some unexpected expenses because we had to pause. This was due to our inexperience and because we were doing this significant public cloud migration for the first time. We were using SAP on a public cloud for the first time.
View full review »Compared to Apigee, which is a one-time cost for on-prem, this solution is cloud-specific and a managed service. So cost-wise, it's comparatively expensive. I would rate it eight out of ten, where one is low and ten is high.
Moreover, there are additional costs to the standard licensing fees. We have to purchase four to five managed services around API to use it. For example, we use the express route and key vault, and we have to purchase those features along with API.
View full review »AK
reviewer2093580
Solutions Architect at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
The pricing is expensive, however, it does offer great value. I'd rate the solution seven or eight out of ten in terms of value for money.
View full review »There are no licensing fees we pay on a monthly basis.
View full review »The solution is highly expensive. Our customers worry about the costs. The price should be a lot less.
We are using the premium license.
I rate the price of Microsoft Azure API Management a seven out of ten.
View full review »I can't disclose how much we pay monthly, but the pricing for Azure API Management is available online. It's pay as you go. The subscription packages have room for different scales. It's calculated by the number of apps or computers you use. You do not have to use the enterprise subscription. These subscriptions have different pricing, so you can find one to meet your needs for scalability.
View full review »I've been using the conception tier. If you choose the lower-end tiers, it'll be fine, cost-wise. However, those tiers are just for development purposes; they're not really for the production environment. I would suspect if you move onto the higher tiers, it'll be pretty pricey.
View full review »RA
RamAlla
Senior Manager, Integration Operation at ManpowerGroup
Microsoft is competitively priced.
View full review »JK
reviewer2123583
Project Director at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
The pricing is reasonable. I'd rate the cost in terms of affordability seven out of ten.
The premium tier is too expensive for medium-sized organizations. However, the local IP only is offered at the premium tier.
View full review »OG
Oleksandr Gaysin
Senior Manager, Engineering at GlobalLogic
The solution has a kind of calculator and it's not always straightforward to figure out the logic in pricing. There are lots of services that are managed in different ways. For a non-technical person, it's a nightmare to figure everything out.
At the end of the day, you have to build approximate pricing for the solution. According to my experiences in multiple projects, you do get preliminary pricing that is close to or the same as the estimate.
It is an expensive solution, but any API solution will be expensive.
View full review »Azure API Management is the most expensive solution on the market. AWS is at least four times less expensive. Any price comparison needs to include the additional cost of the security you will need to purchase from Microsoft, which comes from their premium plan. The only way to reduce the cost is to sacrifice security when using Microsoft data.
I rate the pricing a one out of five.
View full review »Azure is a pay-as-you-go model. You build out your virtual environment and pay a monthly price depending on CPU cores, storage, etc.
View full review »Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis.
View full review »On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten.
View full review »This is an expensive solution.
View full review »SK
Srinivas Kode
Vice President - Competency and Channels at Techwave.
It's being paid monthly. It is comparable and falls in the mid range in the competitive landscape.
View full review »DW
reviewer1474359
Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
I'm just a developer, so I didn't really get involved in the pricing. Therefore, I can't speak to the exact costs of the agreements involved in terms of licensing. That said, I do know that we used the developer license just to try things out. My understanding is that the premium version is quite expensive.
View full review »Microsoft Azure is an expensive solution not for the large enterprises but for medium and small.
View full review »PP
reviewer1539345
Senior Solutions Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The cost of the solution is very fair. It's not overly expensive. It offers very good value.
View full review »AD
Amit Das
Technical Solution Architect at Liwa
Compared to other solutions the cost is a seven out of ten.
View full review »MV
reviewer1972689
Operations Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We are using a basic tier.
For the things we do, it's reasonable in terms of cost. You can implement it in the developer solutions. That's basically more or less free. But if you implement VNET in it there, you can only upgrade it if you use premium, and premium is so expensive. That's just no fun. That was a little bit annoying since you think you have a good solution in your development environment, and then you are in production and need a premium tier to have the same configuration. We had to reconfigure some stuff.
There are no additional costs above the main license.
View full review »Azure's pricing is very competitive compared to platforms like Apigee and MuleSoft. However, when you start with Azure API management, you also need to onboard the Azure console and the Azure cloud environment, which comes with a price.
View full review »GD
reviewer1590651
Group Manager, Solution & Technical Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Since this is a cloud-based solution you have to abide by those financial limits, this creates some different challenges compared to other solutions.
View full review »CS
Cecil Seepaul
Software Engineer
We are paying standard fees to use Microsoft Azure API Management.
View full review »Since everyone is isocentric here, it is reasonable for me. Rather than getting complicated with other licensing, and other products' licensing. There are many, many different types of licensing available in other products, such as perpetual for ten users. If you want more than ten users, you'll have to pay a higher license fee. As a result, we are not falling into those kinds of traps. Previously, we had to pay as you go.
View full review »AL
AmitLochav
General Manager at HCL Technologies
I don't remember licensing information or costs for Microsoft Azure API Management.
View full review »RM
RandallMcClure
Enterprise Architect at Pink Brain Technologies
Licensing is the tricky part. For Azure, if you have your Azure subscription, the API Management is a free tool. There's no extra cost for that.
View full review »RU
reviewer1229334
Senior Operational Technical Analyst at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We pay for a yearly license.
View full review »SK
reviewer1447569
Solution Architect at a sports company with 201-500 employees
It's my understanding that the licensing is very clear. However, I'm not involved in it in any way, and therefore, I'm not sure what the cost structure is.
View full review »PB
Paul-Emmanuel BREC
IT Enterprise Architect - Middleware & Integration at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
The pricing of the product is reasonable. It was one of the selling points for us when we were looking for a solution for our company.
View full review »There are different tiers for pricing. You can even use the free version.
View full review »We are a Microsoft-managed partner, so we do have some pricing from the distributor.
The licensing is dynamic as it is based on cloud usage.
View full review »JL
reviewer1659630
Branch Manager at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The price of the solution is reasonable compared to others.
View full review »The Standard Tier is cost effective.
View full review »CO
reviewer1525593
Executive Director Finance & Strategy at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
The licensing fees are expensive. I would like it to be cheaper.
Our licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis.
View full review »AN
reviewer1581768
Lead Solution Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We are limited to what choice of solution we can purchase. There are multiple aspects here. If it is a choice that we have to make, then we do it based on the requirement or recommendations, such as GCP, AWS, or Azure platform. However, given the present circumstances, the customer base that I am supporting at the moment is all Microsoft shop customers. Their inclination is always towards Microsoft-based solutions. That is where it has left us with no choice, but to go with Azure. While we still recommend this solution in some cases, for instance, analytics and where we need the big data solutions. We have been pushing for a GCP and in some cases to have AWS as well. For now Azure is the platform and this has been the journey that has left us with no choice but to go with it. Based on the resources that we are leveraging, the price we are paying to use this solution is slightly higher than other competitors. In a few cases, it has its own advantage in some resources.
View full review »VV
Vinayak Verlekar
Technology Architect Manager at ESB
The price could be lower.
View full review »The developer and standard pricing tiers of Azure API Management are very competitive compared to other products. If a customer wants to expose their internal APIs to the Azure API Management Portal, then they would require a VPN connection which requires the Premium Pricing tier. This can be expensive and we currently recommend our customers to not use a VPN connection, i.e., if they don’t need additional Premium features; and we suggest they expose their APIs publicly through other technologies such as the relay services.
View full review »Nothing. Day to Day costs are very minimal, tens of dollars a month or so depending on peaks of usage.
View full review »Understand the different Tiers (from small to large including VNet-integrated express route)
Start small and be aware that the developer version has all features enabled which also requires the highest possible Tier.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure API Management
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure API Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.