Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pros and Cons
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pros
The solution was very easy to configure. It wasn't hard at all to adjust it to our needs.
View full review »This is a SaaS product, so it is always up to date.
View full review »The solution is easy to set up.
View full review » Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The pricing is quite good.
View full review »The simplicity of the solution and its ability to integrate easily with others are its most valuable aspects.
View full review »WAF feature replicates the firewall.
View full review »We chose this solution in the first place because it has access to Layer 7. I can control the requests and the content, which I can access on my network if I want to even if it's forbidden access to other external resources. If I want to monitor, for example, traffic, and apply this rule on Layer 7, I can do so. This was our main goal when implementing this application. We wanted to take advantage of the Gateway capabilities.
View full review »Good customization; able to report and take action on alerts.
View full review »Load balancing and web application firewall features are the most valuable.
View full review »Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Cons
The security of the product could be adjusted.
View full review »For the first-time user, it is difficult to understand so the user-interface needs to be improved.
View full review »The configuration is very specific right now and needs to be much more flexible.
View full review » Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The monitoring on the solution could be better.
View full review »The pricing of the solution could be improved. Right now, it's a bit expensive.
View full review »Scalability can be an issue.
View full review »The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems.
View full review »Needs easier integration with the existing SIAM.
View full review »It does not have the flexibility for using public IPs in version 2.
View full review » Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.