Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pros and Cons

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pros

reviewer1288212
Network Administrator at a government with 201-500 employees
The solution was very easy to configure. It wasn't hard at all to adjust it to our needs.
View full review »
Sukun Jain
Senior Software Engineer at Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
This is a SaaS product, so it is always up to date.
View full review »
reviewer1487883
Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution is easy to set up.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1475799
Cloud Solutions Administrator at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The pricing is quite good.
View full review »
reviewer957105
Asst. Vice President at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The simplicity of the solution and its ability to integrate easily with others are its most valuable aspects.
View full review »
reviewer1450641
Consultant Azure Cloud Infra & Apps at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
WAF feature replicates the firewall.
View full review »
Systeamlead67
Systems Team Leader at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We chose this solution in the first place because it has access to Layer 7. I can control the requests and the content, which I can access on my network if I want to even if it's forbidden access to other external resources. If I want to monitor, for example, traffic, and apply this rule on Layer 7, I can do so. This was our main goal when implementing this application. We wanted to take advantage of the Gateway capabilities.
View full review »
reviewer1412490
Security Specialist at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Good customization; able to report and take action on alerts.
View full review »
reviewer1433010
Cloud Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Load balancing and web application firewall features are the most valuable.
View full review »

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Cons

reviewer1288212
Network Administrator at a government with 201-500 employees
The security of the product could be adjusted.
View full review »
Sukun Jain
Senior Software Engineer at Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
For the first-time user, it is difficult to understand so the user-interface needs to be improved.
View full review »
reviewer1487883
Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The configuration is very specific right now and needs to be much more flexible.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1475799
Cloud Solutions Administrator at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The monitoring on the solution could be better.
View full review »
reviewer957105
Asst. Vice President at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The pricing of the solution could be improved. Right now, it's a bit expensive.
View full review »
reviewer1450641
Consultant Azure Cloud Infra & Apps at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Scalability can be an issue.
View full review »
Systeamlead67
Systems Team Leader at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems.
View full review »
reviewer1412490
Security Specialist at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Needs easier integration with the existing SIAM.
View full review »
reviewer1433010
Cloud Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
It does not have the flexibility for using public IPs in version 2.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.