Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Room for Improvement
Network Administrator at a government with 201-500 employees
The functionality needs a lot of improvement.
The security of the product could be adjusted.
The scalability needs improvement.
Overall, it just wasn't a great product. It was lacking in a lot of areas.
Just watching the industry, it could be that Microsoft, is going to have to give more resources to it in order to make it work. Microsoft knows a lot about software. They're going to have to get more resources into it and add people and time to it to make it competitive. They may even need to consider some sort of acquisition to bring in new tech. Right now, the solution just isn't there in terms of what is needed and expected.
The solution simply has to be more comparable to other leading product s at this point. It's just lacking the overall intelligence to compete.View full review »
The documentation is not user-friendly and it is not very easy to use. For the first-time user, it is difficult to understand so the user-interface needs to be improved.
The tutorials are something that can be improved upon.
I would like to see this more of a multitenant solution.View full review »
Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The configuration is very specific right now and needs to be much more flexible. They need to work on it so that it's much easier to configure the solution so that it works how we need it to. It needs to be customizable.
The firewall portion of the gateway is very basic. It needs to be improved upon. It needs to be more robust.View full review »
Cloud Solutions Administrator at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Occasionally the solution is too secure and we need it to allow in specific traffic. It tends to cut that traffic off due to its high security settings.
The monitoring on the solution could be better.
The product requires better reporting capabilities. Currently, we need to have a third-party handle that aspect for us.
There needs to be more of a security center. That way, we're able to see everything that's going on in the system.
The product needs to offer DDoS protection.View full review »
Asst. Vice President at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The pricing of the solution could be improved. Right now, it's a bit expensive.
Although the integration is quite good, it could still be improved upon.
The implementation should be further simplified to make it easier to use right from the onset.View full review »
Consultant Azure Cloud Infra & Apps at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Scalability can be a bit of an issue although it's better in v2. I'd also like to see increased flexibility. There are limits when you want to share an application gateway across multiple clusters. I know Microsoft is working on that, but we don't know when it will be finished and released to the public.
Systems Team Leader at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems.
Security Specialist at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
The main drawback of the solution is that it's only for Azure. I'd like to see easier integration with the existing SIAM. Even when they do introduce new features, it's in preview for a long time, like the current geo filter option which is in review but it's been there for a long time. Microsoft could introduce preview options more quickly.
Sr. SAP Portfolio Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
One of the challenges we faced was the solution does not support any other PCP protocols apart from HTTP and HTTPS. We had some requirement for load balancing that it did not support SAP, they should provide support for more protocols.View full review »
Cloud Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
It does not have the flexibility for using public IPs in version 2.View full review »