Microsoft Azure DevOps Room for Improvement

IrvingGreen
Senior Director at Cloud Technovation
Azure DevOps is a very cross-platform product. One of the issues that I have currently with the company is that they are using two different parts of technology. They were using JIRA for their sprint work and they were also using Confluence, as well as other Enterprise software. I advised them that all their sprint planning, backlog work, and everything else, can be done out of Azure DevOps from one central place. I know the Microsoft team will always look at improvements because I know that they are constantly looking at improvements to products while listening to their customers and looking at a global scale. I'm keeping my ear to the ground, as I always do. The product keeps evolving and at the moment there are a lot of good parts There are petabytes of data. Anytime somebody does a pull request or anything else, Microsoft is notified about it. So if somebody, somewhere is always looking at that and watching, that can be a revolutionary product. It's a product that can continuously grow and evolve in time. Even if it is not yet what you call a finished article, it's a growing and evolving product. Everybody has a slightly different take on what solutions or what part of the solution they would like to be improved. You can always improve a platform. Microsoft is always listening to customers and they will bring out a new version. The platform is quite user-friendly at the moment because you can use any program or language with it. You can't say you need another program, because as far as I'm concerned the main ones can be integrated with Azure. The newer ones like Go, as well as older ones like Python, Java, and PSP, can all be integrated with that platform. I suppose when we hear about that release, I have no doubt that because Microsoft captures a lot of metrics and information that they monitor, like capturing data about what or how people use their product, they can see where the usage is and where they might want to remove a feature. That analysis and also comes from Microsoft's monitoring capabilities. View full review »
Ove Holmberg
Enterprise Agile Coach at Knowit Require
There is a lack of integration and portability with other tools and products. I would like to see better interoperability with the agile scaling frameworks. When I first started using Azure it was impossible to figure out how to do the configuration correctly. Perhaps there should be a configuration environment that hides some features and is not open for everyone. I find it difficult to find some of the features, although it may be that they are not enabled, or perhaps I have to take some time to better understand the tool. View full review »
Vlad Glukhovskiy
Senior Project Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Non-functional testing such as security testing, penetration testing, and performance testing could be improved. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: July 2019.
353,345 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Software1701
Software Architect Consultant at a tech consulting company with self employed
Better integration with the Linux operating system would be an improvement for this solution. I would like to see more third-party plugins; by comparison, the open source solution, Jenkins, has thousands of plugins available. The Wiki for this solution is not very good. There is a problem when you want to run a release pipeline for an organization that needs enhanced security. There is no option to configure a dynamic login for a station that is running the tests. The only solution in the platform is to configure an agent that uses a fixed username and password login. There is no option to change the username or password for the login dynamically. If I want to run multiple tests, with different users, then I cannot do it. When it comes to running tests, it needs an option to use different users or authentications. This is a very important feature that is missing. View full review »
NeerengSys44
System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It is not clear what features have been added or enhanced since the last version. My customer used a previous version and it did not meet their expectations, so clarification with respect to the new version is needed on their website or other venues. I would like to see more customization available to the administrator. You need to change the workflow of the end result. View full review »
Mohamed Sadek
Lead DevOps and Release Engineer-L2 at ITWORX
* Enable more control on Application Insights integration to open different types of work items as this is area still need more enhancements. * Test management extension is too high to be paid on a monthly basis. * Test and feedback chrome extension still need more development as they are not very stable. View full review »
Murat Gurkas
Product Owner
* It would be better to have a free text query editor. * Product management/roadmap planning features are missing. View full review »
Daniel Hall
Technical Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees
Information to make it easier to choose items from the marketplace (like MS verified), etc. Otherwise, every item requires a full InfoSec review. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: July 2019.
353,345 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email