Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Other Solutions Considered

N Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Director Of Technology at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

We evaluated quite a lot of options. We compared Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio against Google Cloud and AWS solutions, and there were several others available in the market. I'm trying to recollect the names which we compared the solution with. We did the benchmarking, but we went with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio because our clients and their data were on Azure, though that doesn't necessarily make you go with the solution. After all, you can pull the data from any other cloud as well. For our use case, however, we found many of the things were readily available and the learning curve for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio compared to others was better and easier. We didn't have to search for experts in the market to hire them because we could have our in-house team learn and deliver the solution on the job.

View full review »
Gerald Dunn - PeerSpot reviewer
Director and Owner at Standswell Ltd

Before choosing the solution, we evaluated Databricks. We chose Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio to get as close to the Microsoft pattern as possible. We have a Microsoft first policy, and therefore, unless there's a reason not to use Microsoft, we choose Microsoft.

View full review »
Marta Frąckowiak - PeerSpot reviewer
Student at Gdańsk University of Technology

Before choosing Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, I only evaluated Google Cloudpath.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ognian Dantchev - PeerSpot reviewer
Machine Learning Engineer at ALSO Finland Oy

We used Google in the past.

View full review »
VL
Senior Manager - Data & Analytics at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

We are in the process of deciding which machine learning solution we want to use. I have been dabbling with Azure and we're deciding whether to implement it versus another cloud platform.

View full review »
it_user833565 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer

R and Python.

Python + Pandas + scikit-learn: 

Pros: 

  • scikit-learn offers better performance for extremely large data sets
  • Large-data manipulation tools
  • Fairly good set of ML algorithms

Cons:

  • High barrier to entry, in terms of skill and knowledge
  • Fairly labor intensive to create large number of experiments

R + caret:

Pros:

  • Very good amount of ML algorithms (so many it may cause paralysis from too much choice, 200-plus algorithms)
  • Good performance, unless the data set is extremely large

Cons:

  • High barrier to entry
  • Data manipulation is a pain, you probably want to use another tool to pre-treat the data before loading it into R dataframes
View full review »
PS
Data & AI CoE Managing Consultant at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

I evaluated Amazon SageMaker, which is a bit more advanced than Azure Machine Learning, with more functionalities and only a slightly higher price.

View full review »
JN
Co-Founder at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We thought of doing this traditionally from scratch, but the Azure work space gives you the opportunity to utilize the environment and provide service in the shortest time possible.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.