It's all scalable. It has lifecycle management where I can define a rule so that I can easily archive or move the data from the cool tier to the hot tier based on the uses and then I can also send it into the cool tier so that it can be frequently accessed. If I do that, the cost can also be minimized.

Since Microsoft Azure Object Storage is a cloud-based solution, it is easily scalable.

The solution is used extensively by our organization’s IT team.

The product is scalable. Veeam Backup systems are using the solution as a second backup.

The scalability of Microsoft Azure Object Storage depends on the use case and how an aspect of the solution can be leveraged as data storage on public storage. Still, based on my use case, Microsoft Azure Object Storage is scalable.

More than 2,000 people were using those kinds of things.

Microsoft Azure Object Storage is a scalable solution. Around 1,000 users are using the solution in our organization.

I rate the tool's scalability a nine out of ten. My company has more than 100 users who use it 24/7.  

Scalability is one of the strongest aspects of the product. I would rate it as a nine out of ten. We have approximately 10,000 end users of the product.

It's scalable. We can increase storage as required. 

Azure Object Storage is mapped with a user. It's mapped to the server for storing files and all. So IOPS storage, probably we can talk 20,000 to 30,000 IOPS.

We monitor the usage based on there being increases.

Microsoft Azure Object Storage is a scalable solution. Around 200 users are using the solution in our organization, and we have plans to increase the usage.

I rate the solution nine out of ten in terms of its ability to scale. Since it is a management service, we should not bother about scaling. This is because we have a very good scaling policy for management services. As I recently joined the organization, I am not aware of how many employees are currently using this solution.

The tool is scalable. I rate the scalability an eight and a half out of ten. Around 100 technical support team members, including support engineers, support analysts, and service delivery managers, use the solution in our organization.

My company has 100 users for Microsoft Azure Object Storage. 

Microsoft Azure Object Storage is a scalable solution. I believe this will grow, just like AWS, because it's totally isolated, and even websites could use that separately. I think Azure is beginning to take that path where other applications could directly connect to it and use the storage system. I believe there is a feature to interconnect all the other products they have.

It is scalable and we have around ten users.

Microsoft Azure Object Storage is scalable, and we have nine users. 

From our requirement perspective, the required scalability existed in the solution. We had no issues with scaling. 

There has been no issue with scalability with this product when accessing or adding users. However, we noticed that when we generated SaaS, it is at the storage account level. This should be specific to containers. However, whenever we change the container name without changing the whole key, it works.

The solution is specific to the application and not personal usage. For most applications, I see between one or two storage accounts. Most people are logging log storage and diagnostic storage. 

I haven't hit any limitations yet, and I'd say it is scalable. There are probably different scaling solutions, such as a data lake or a data warehouse. Those would be the next version of this, as opposed to binary large object storage.

We have less than five users.

The solution is very scalable. 

This is a scalable solution. We have specifically configured it for scalability. 

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

We plan to increase the further usage depending on the customer's requirements. 

The solution is scalable. I rate it a five out of ten.

I would rate the scalability as a ten out of ten. It is definitely scalable enough for our needs. Ten people use the solution at our company.

The tool’s scalability is good.

We've never had any problem with scaling. It is scalable. Being a government institution and having that contract signed at the government level, we just have to request additional resources or storage capacity. It's very good.

It is a scalable solution. Around hundred users are using the solution presently. We extensively used the solution. Even that we process data, we have large amounts of data. We intentionally use it, but we use it from the processing perspective, not from the end user listing. 

This solution is scalable.

This is definitely a scalable solution.

This solution is used by the consumers of our products, of which there are at least 10,000.

I rate the product's scalability a nine out of ten.

The scalability of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is alright for what we use it for.

We have approximately 1,000 users using this solution in my organization. We have plans to increase the usage.

Microsoft Azure Object Storage can scale in terms of users using the solution.

I am in a team of 50 and I am the manager of the team. In our company, all the project teams, and developers are using Microsoft Azure Object Storage mostly in the repair. We have approximately 300 to 500 developers using the solution.

Object Storage is scalable.

This solution is very easy to scale. All of the object storage solutions have the same features.

There are no issues with scalability. We have approximately 400,000 users who are students, as well as others.

This solution is easy to scale.

In most cases, it is used quite extensively.

We have people who use the solution on a daily basis in our organization. There are about 50 or more users.

It's quite easy to scale the solution as needed.

Object Storage is scalable.