It is a very stable solution. I would rate the stability a ten, but I never give it ten, so I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. It's quite stable, although there have been occasional downtimes affecting entire regions, but these issues are resolved quickly without causing significant business interruptions.

It's stable. However, we had a major incident in Singapore last year, even though we don't have any resources in Australia (where another major incident occurred). 

Aside from that, we consider it reliable. One issue is that Microsoft sometimes upgrades released instances without notifying us (the last notification was in August). This happened with an automated upgrade I'm still working on resolving with support.

In terms of the product stability, we have encountered occasional issues. Sometimes, we encounter delays or wait times, especially when utilizing newly introduced services still in the preview phase. These services may initially experience glitches or bugs as they undergo testing and refinement. However, many of these issues are addressed over time, and the stability improves as the products mature. Azure continues to evolve rapidly, with new features being introduced frequently, which may contribute to occasional instability.

The tool is stable most of the time. Sometimes, when there is an issue, it takes a long time to resolve. I rate the stability a seven out of ten. The stability must be improved.

The solution is quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's quite reliable for our organization.

It is a stable product. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. 

I rate the product’s stability a ten out of ten.

The tool’s stability is good.

We have not faced any stability issues with Microsoft Azure.

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

The stability is perfect. We have found no issues yet when using Microsoft Azure.

The solution is stable. 

It's easy to monitor, there's no problem with the code in their development. We had some stability issues, it was not the fault of Microsoft Azure, but it was the mistakes of the developers. It was easy to monitor it in Azure.

It is a stable solution because it depends on the workload you expect. Based on that data, you can configure how many users it can handle.

Managed services are definitely more efficient than IaaS and offer a performance-centric approach.

It is highly scalable.

I rate the stability of the tool a nine and a half out of ten.

The tool's stability is good, and I would give it a nine out of ten. The challenges in connectivity, particularly when dealing with cloud services. It's complex and challenging to troubleshoot connectivity issues, especially when the source of the problem isn't clear.

I have not had any stability issues with Azure.

The platform is stable. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

It's been pretty stable. There have only been one or two instances where Microsoft went down. One time, it was the building's main operations center that was struck by lightning and caught on fire.

The product is stable. We have not encountered any security threats or issues during our five years of using Azure.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

Microsoft Azure is a very stable solution.

I rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten for stability.

I would rate it a five out of ten.

I would rate it 9 out of 10 since it is stable but can get better.

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

Regarding stability, Azure is doing well in terms of IES portfolio. They need to progress on the implementation of more data centers in a single region, which would increase their service level agreement by a little. They definitely need to work on their DevOps services. AWS' DevOps services are pretty good. If you go into ratings, the leading raters or the leading magazines, Forrester or Gartner or IDC, rate AWS services much higher compared to Azure. So, they need to increase on their service.

The third thing on the stability factor is that they publish more cases on the core infrastructure migration, the mission critical applications like SAP migration or Apple migrations. Putting the case studies on the portal would alleviate the doubt that Azure is stable. Azure is stable, but the case studies have to be there to support that.

The solution could improve the stability. However, this could be a configuration issue that we are not been trained.

This solution is quite stable. We haven't had any issues stability-wise.

Azure is highly stable, with only one instance of downtime experienced on a specific website and two occurrences in approximately nine months. Overall, it maintains a commendable level of stability, especially when availability zones are utilized. These zones provide critical redundancy, ensuring resilience against unforeseen events and offering a heightened level of reliability.

Stability-wise, it has been fine.

Azure is a stable product.

 I don't see any major bugs in the cloud environment.

I rate Microsoft Azure a seven out of ten for stability.

Microsoft Azure is stable.

The stability of the solution is excellent. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. the performance has been good. 

It has a very high uptime for services. They are able to provide as per Service Level Agreement (SLA). We are not seeing any downtime for our applications. Our users have not reported any issues. 

They have their internal redundancy for hardware and software. If there is an issue with any hardware, another hardware is ready to take the load.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The tool is 99.99% stable.

Microsoft Azure is highly stable.

In terms of stability, for me, it works. However, depends on the type of project that's happening. If you're going to have just a virtual machine running there then it can fail. That said, the platform offers a lot of options to improve the capability, so it depends on how much money a client wants to invest.

The product is stable. There are a few qualifications attached to that.  

I think the stability of Azure varies depending on the workloads. It is more stable from the perspective of how it behaves in a mid-size deployment. For a very, very large implementation, I have yet to see that same kind of inherent stability. I believe it is because of the complexity of the client's system or architecture.  

You may be able to say that if it is more of a Microsoft product landscape, then possibly it is more stable in general. The more that there is a mixture of technologies, then it will tend to be less stable. No application can be stable in every circumstance.  

As the project I am engaged in is very large, we have experienced some episodes of instability. We solve the stability problems as we go along to a great extent. But I think there are a lot of situations that have to be dealt with in real-time. Though we have direct contact with a Microsoft team architect, it is difficult for them at times to just jump in and solve an issue. You can not usually solve a problem instantly looking down at it from 55,000 feet when the situation on the ground is very, very complex.  

At first, they only have generalized solutions to your problem. I think they need an extension of the existing team. This would be like a core team to work with client organizations to do case studies to define patterns in what is causing instabilities.  

Because Azure is cloud technology and cloud comes with its own problems, these bleed over into Azure stability. All these patterns that contribute to instability have to come out in order to be solved. As Microsoft collects more case studies and more knowledge of where these problems tend to occur, this should enable them to stabilize the product against those issues.  

Overall, I would say Microsoft Azure is a stable solution, but even as a stable solution, it usually has some bugs or glitches.  

Microsoft Azure is a very stable solution, and I've never had any issues with the solution's stability.

I rate the solution ten out of ten for stability.

I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten. 

This is definitely a stable platform. I haven't seen issues in that respect.

The stability is very good. As it is a Microsoft product, the reliability is very good.

The tool’s stability is good.

It is absolutely stable. Microsoft doesn't want to sell something that isn't.

The solution is stable, one of the most reliable in the Philippines. The downside is that currently all the services are outside the country. Singapore and Hong Kong provide the closest service but we have laws that prohibit certain amounts of data residing in other countries. None of that affects stability. 

The solution is very stable and reliable. The performance is good. It's not buggy. there aren't glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

The solution has been stable.

This is a stable solution.

The stability has been great. We haven't had any issues whatsoever with stability.

Microsoft Azure is a very stable solution. 

Microsoft Azure is highly stable. However, Microsoft could improve the availability of the services by creating availability zones that are services working active-active in different positions around the globe. If any of these positions fall down, then another position will deliver the solution. This way there is no loss of service or loss to the business.

Although I am not the administrator, there are some things that are kind of quirky. The biggest problem is that we're a really, really, really big SharePoint user. Everything that's 100% SharePoint online, is not a one-for-one into the SharePoint that we have on-prem. 

Security is a problem, that's why we only allow web products for Office 365. SharePoint doesn't give us everything that we need. These are a few of the drawbacks for us.

Microsoft Azure's stability depends on the resources allocated. If you provision sufficient resources, it tends to be stable. However, choosing lower resources, like two gigs of RAM and CPUs, might lead to less stability.

I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten.

Microsoft Azure is a stable solution.

The solution is stable. 

Azure is stable. We've never had any problems. 

In the short time that we have been using this solution, it appears to be stable enough for our needs.

The solution is stable, although I'd like some advance warning when they make changes. It can sometimes take hours to update so that if I have a user using multifactor authentication and I take them off, it can take up to an hour for it to take effect.

It's a stable product.

Its stability is good. It is very stable.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

Microsoft Azure is very stable, it has a SLA of 99.9%.

Microsoft Azure is a stable solution.

The solution is stable. 

The stability of the solution has been excellent. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. It doesn't crash or free. the performance is good. 

Microsoft Azure is stable and it's a reliable solution.

I can guarantee that it's 100% reliable.

Microsoft Azure is stable.

It is pretty stable. It has very good stability.

No issues with stability. Has been rock solid.

It is a stable product.

The stability of the solution was good we have not had a problem.

The solution is stable. 

Stability is very good.

It seems to me that Azure is a little less stable than AWS but not so that it makes a difference, given how much time you save doing other stuff like configuring, etc.

Microsoft Azure is stable. 

I rate Microsoft Azure's stability a nine out of ten. 

Microsoft Azure is stable, I did not encounter any issues or anything in the platform. The uptime is very good. 

When you design your solution, you can make sure that everything is accounted for in your design, such as all the options are there. Microsoft Azure in itself is rarely down. If there is a complete blackout it can happen, but normally no. It's very reliable.

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten, as they are still developing. 

Azure is a stable system.

No, so far we've had no problems with anything we've deployed onto Microsoft Azure, rock solid.

There were very minor issues related to billing. For example, sometimes under accounts with the Enterprise Agreements, we see that storage accounts are missing access to the activity costs.

The performance of Microsoft Azure depends on whether you have good bandwidth for your data connection, if the connection is strong then the performance is good. If you have a very poor connection, then it's can be a little slow, but has been okay.

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The solution is stable.

Microsoft Azure is a stable product.

The solution is stable.

Lots of glitches are still there. Microsoft is constantly working to resolve those. It is a new product as compared to AWS, so, obviously, it would have some glitches. Three years ago, it was full of bugs. It is much better and stable now.

I have had no stability issues. It is a very stable platform and very resilient. It comes down how you set up your geo-redundant options for backups, SQL replication. and VMs which run your services/apps.

I have found Microsoft Azure to be stable.

There are some glitches but it's a pretty solid solution. 

The solution is stable.

The solution is stable.

The product is very stable compared to if you are going to employ it in-house. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. t's reliable. 

This solution is stable. We were quite happy with Azure's performance.

Microsoft Azure is stable.

The stability of the product is very good. It doesn't have bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It's been very reliable for the most part.

The solution is stable under the right circumstances. 

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance, overall, has been rather reliable for our organization.

I had no stability issues.

There have been few problems with stability. Only a couple times there were outages that only impacted our development environment. Notice of these service interruptions are generally given with plenty of time to prepare.

Microsoft Azure is a stable solution.

Microsoft Azure has been stable for us, we have not faced any issues.

The solution is reasonably stable.

The stability is very good. It's a reliable solution. There are no bugs and glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is very stable.

The stability is very good.

There has been documented issues with stability, however we did not experience it.

Azure has had some issues on and off, but that was a couple of years back, and now it seems okay. Sometimes the performance of the cloud degrades, but there are workarounds. 

Microsoft Azure is a stable solution.

The stability is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

Azure is reliable. I am doing other work for another company where I do not host it in Azure myself, but they have a U-systems running on Azure and it is operating all over the world. There are times when it can slow down a little but most of the time, it runs very smoothly.

Microsoft Azure is very reliable. It's a highly stable solution.

The solution is very stable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable.

It is stable. I have not seen it have any downtime.

Early on, there were issues with the workload interruptions. Over the past 12 months, it has been a stable cloud service.

Azure's stability is ok, but there are issues sometimes. I'd rate its stability as seven or eight out of ten.

It is stable.

The stability of the product has been great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is scalable.

This solution is stable. 

Azure is as stable as most cloud providers like AWS and Google Cloud.

Microsoft Azure is stable.

Microsoft Azure is a stable solution.

Microsoft Azure is very stable. 

For the most part, the solution is stable. It's great with the Windows solution, however, with Linux and other operating systems, I hope that it's okay. I don't know for certain. I've never tried it with others. For Windows, it is very good. When the customer has all-Windows solutions everything is okay. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze.

In general, stability is good, but in the past month I had some issues with the connection to Azure resources, not just Microsoft Azure, but with Azure in general. Microsoft has an issue with its authentication system which has proved painful, because my applications were up and running, but I can't log in to make changes or see metrics. It's a lot better now, we've had the application down three or four times but it hasn't been critical. 

The stability of the solution has been very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

The stability has been good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable in terms of performance.

Stability is good and the solution is easy to maintain. 

For me and many other people, the general view is that Azure is very stable. We definitely plan to continue using it in the future.

Should always go with recommendations provided by Microsoft during the creation of new clusters. Otherwise, stability is an issue.

Microsoft Azure is a stable solution.

There are some products that have good stability and virtual machines - depending on your setup and configuration - are very good. With Microsoft Azure, it's very rare that I even have a problem with it. In any solution, there's always some form of issue, however, with this, it's less common.

Microsoft Azure is a stable solution.

The solution is stable.

Microsoft Azure is pretty stable.

It has good stability. It has an availability of 99,9%.

Until now I have only had a few problems with stability. There was a problem with Azure Active Directory in the US central region that affected almost all of the data centers around two or three months ago but otherwise, it's good stability. The stability is good enough.

Azure stability is good.

A few years ago, it was unstable, but I've not seen any issues off late. A lot of new features are being added to Microsoft Azure, but I have not seen any stability issues.

The old services are stable. We recently saw a security issue published online. So, the new services might be less stable, but I wouldn't say it is not stable.

It is stable, and it works. It is not the best public cloud in terms of technology, but it does its job, and it does it well.

The solution is very stable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. It is reliable and the performance is good.

We had issues with the Mobile Service ORM and the Azure SQL Database (cloud version of SQL Server). At times, the queries that are created automatically from the ORM mapping are not very well optimized for this database and that can lead to performance and stability issues. On occasion, the connection manager from the ORM does not handle the database connections very well.

Azure is very stable with its services, I have never had problems with its stability.

There have been no stability issues. I have some problems related to subscription management, but this is because I have more than one subscription and there were some problems related to merging those into one management.

We had no stability issues.

Microsoft Azure is very stable.

The stability is good. There is compliance with the SLAs and we have not encountered any issues in this domain. 

The solution is stable. 

The stability is very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. Its performance is reliable. 

The solution is scalable.

Access to the virtual machine on Azure wasn't always available, but the application was always up and running.

In terms of stability, I've seen it go down twice now. They've had two problems with the active directory. That said, I would describe it as stable. They have different sites, regions, and whatnot, where you can move your data around in case you lose a data center or you lose a region. However, if you lose the active directory, that can take everything down.

It's not any more stable than an enterprise environment, to be honest. Maybe a little bit, however, if you lose a network connection to it, that's not stable.

I worked in a bank, a huge 50,000 employee enterprise. I saw their infrastructure go up and down about the same, once or twice a year. That's about the same as Azure, therefore, it's not anything different than an enterprise. You can make an enterprise resilient if you have lots of domain controllers and you do lots of redundant paths. 

We've found the stability to be quite good. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

The stability of Microsoft Azure has been very good from what we have seen.

No

Azure is very stable with no issues at all.

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. it's reliable and the performance is good. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

Microsoft Azure is a stable and reliable solution.

This is a stable product and we plan to continue using it.

In the past, they had some major outages, but it is a pretty stable platform.

The solution so far has been reliable. We haven't had problems with stability over the last two years of use. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's been good.

The stability depends on the customer. They decide the compute and other things, such as the level of support. If they take premium support then the SLA given by Microsoft is higher than when you choose a virtual machine without premium.

The stability of the solution is pretty good. It doesn't cause bottlenecks or any other major issues for us. We find it to be reliable.

Yes. Beware of August. Microsoft makes some big changes during this month and they have an impact on customers.

There were some stability issues. Some of them were user-specific (some applications were buggy), while some were global https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/status/history/.

I have not had a problem with the stability. It is reliable.

Microsoft Azure has been stable

It is stable.

Microsoft Azure is stable.

The solution is stable.

We have found the stability and performance to be quite good. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. 

It's a stable solution.

I can't complain.

It is a stable product, but it also depends on the configuration.

It is stable.

This product is stable enough.

I haven't had any issues with stability. I think it's more to do with the volume of data that I am playing with which for now is only 5GB of data. I don't expect any problems.

There is room for improvement in terms of stability.

No. We do not have problems with stability.

I have not seen any stability issues. High availability and reliability is good if you follow Microsoft development practices.

We did not encounter any issues with stability.

The solution is stable.

Microsoft Azure is very stable.

The solution is stable. 

The stability is okay. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. However, AWS seems to be a bit better.

In terms of downtime, if you look at the reporting side, if you look at the Gartner report, it shows that AWS experienced significantly fewer outages as compared to Azure.

Microsoft Azure is stable 99 percent of the time.

Microsoft Azure is both stable and scalable.

The stability needs improvement. At times when there is a problem in one area, everything gets stopped, which is not good.

If the problem is the bandwidth and you have a number of redundancies or lines that link to Azure, you will have few options in Azure.

We haven't had any issues with stability in the last 12 months, prior to that there were some small problems. 

I have not been overly impressed with stability in the last years.

Sometimes in the management portal, not in the workloads.

Azure is pretty stable, so far.

The solution is stable.

Microsoft Azure is very stable.

This solution is very stable.

There were issues with stability.

Azure is stable. I don't have any problems with it.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is stable and has good performance.

The solution is very stable. There's never any downtime. We don't deal with crashes or freezing. There aren't bugs or glitches. It works well.

I have found Microsoft Azure to be stable. We have large corporate customers and it is working great.

Azure is quite stable.

It is cloud software, and as such, it's not stable. Cloud software evolves quickly, but there are not a lot of new features.

The software is stable for the moment, but there is an ongoing development of the software that is creating several features. It is fine as it is.

The solution is stable.

I think Microsoft Azure is fairly stable. It also depends on how you set up your design.

Over the last 12 months we've seen 2 outages.

Microsoft Azure is stable.

The stability isn't that good as compared to AWS. Azure just seems to have more issues in general. It's not the worst, however, it's definitely not the best. We need to make a plan in case the percentage goes down. 

We sometimes have issues with the Azure login. It's been a problem for the last few years. We've also had a data center fail.

Microsoft Azure is stable and I haven't noticed any issues with it.

It is very stable.

The solution is stable in my experience.

I have not heard any complaints about the stability of Azure. Most likely, we will continue to use it in the future.

Stability is great.

Microsoft Azure is a stable solution.

This solution is stable.

By using a free account for cloud services can bring you "queued" status, but normally it runs smoothly. The quota defined for free account is enough for a variety of experiments and none of the features are blocked.

Microsoft Azure is stable.

Microsoft Azure is stable.

Azure is a very stable product.

It is stable.

It is stable.

It's a stable solution.

It is stable.

No.