Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros review quotes

Anna Virtsan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2023
I rate Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's stability a ten out of ten.
JP
Nov 11, 2022
Because everything is on Microsoft and we use Azure, integration with the product is easier. That's the most important thing when you use many Microsoft products. It's easier to integrate everything in one place.
JH
May 13, 2021
The auto-labeling feature is definitely the most valuable feature. It goes in and labels the documents for you in different repositories. It covers the Outlook and Exchange repositories along with SharePoint and OneDrive. It is really helpful in those areas.
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Roby Skariah - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 11, 2023
One of the valuable features of Purview is the ability to create a legal hold on a user's account within the compliance portal. That's pretty useful when it comes to any litigation or if you want to redeem the content within a mailbox, OneDrive, or a generic public SharePoint site.
Bryan Sprowls - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 28, 2023
The product can block the uploads to cloud services.
LILIANE GUIDO - PeerSpot reviewer
May 19, 2023
The product is easy to configure.
Subbu Madhira - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 11, 2022
There's a good amount of documentation in case you run into any problems.
Mohammed Irfan Gorur - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 9, 2022
It has helped our clients to reduce the time to action on insider threats because it can be integrated.
VK
Nov 28, 2023
The most valuable features are identifying sensitive data and issuing alerts.
AS
Nov 15, 2023
For Purview's natively integrated compliance across Azure, Dynamics 365, and Office 365, I would give it a 10 out of 10. It provides all the insights and information.
 

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Cons review quotes

Anna Virtsan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2023
They do not provide language options beyond the ones already available, so our language option is missing.
JP
Nov 11, 2022
There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful.
JH
May 13, 2021
There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great.
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Roby Skariah - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 11, 2023
A site can have different containers where you store data. We have always wanted to apply compliance, labels, and policies at the container level, rather than to an outer shell or at the site level. That is something we have been looking forward to and I believe Microsoft is already planning something like that.
Bryan Sprowls - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 28, 2023
The support is poor.
LILIANE GUIDO - PeerSpot reviewer
May 19, 2023
The solution should provide better integration with other systems.
Subbu Madhira - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 11, 2022
Technical support is awful.
Mohammed Irfan Gorur - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 9, 2022
I would like Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to be on the source code or SQL databases. It is difficult to do classification and labeling when you have a third-party source code or a third-party Oracle database. It is seamless when it comes to Microsoft documents but is not so with third-party source codes. Microsoft needs to work on it a little bit more.
VK
Nov 28, 2023
There is a need for improvements, particularly in ensuring that file-based recognition is more reliable and comprehensive.
AS
Nov 15, 2023
The scalability, in terms of the portal, could be more user-friendly. Sometimes I have faced difficulties in identifying the options.