Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Overview

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is the #13 ranked solution in our list of top Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) tools. It is most often compared to Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine): Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security vs Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine)

What is Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security?

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security (EMS) is the only comprehensive solution designed to help manage and protect users, devices, apps, and data in a mobile-first, cloud-first world.

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is also known as Enterprise Mobility + Security E3, Enterprise Mobility + Security E5, MS Enterprise Mobility + Security, MS Enterprise Mobility + Security, MS Enterprise Mobility + Security.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: June 2021

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Customers

Mars, Whole Foods, Land O'Lakes, Dow

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security Video

Filter Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
RK
Java Developer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Excellent security and documentation with constant updating to protect from threats

What is our primary use case?

It's a solution that's basically helping administrators to manage the end-user environment. Whatever they're doing in the system, we make sure there's no data leakage happening, and we are fully protected, and always getting security patches.

Pros and Cons

  • "The solution offers excellent documentation that is easily available online."
  • "Technical support could be improved. Sometimes they use a third party that's not so knowledgeable in the product and that can slow down things a bit."

What other advice do I have?

It's actually just not one product, it's a combination of products. For example, there is Windows inside it. It's got editions of CCM, Office, etc. All are deployed with them. There's also no one particular version here. They are always evolving and updating. The deployment we have is a hybrid kind of contract. However, we are mainly using on-premise deployment. We are currently trying out the could and we are still taking time to explore it. We're asking ourselves: what is the benefit we are going to get? I would recommend other organizations go for E5 licenses rather than relying on E3 if…
AS
Technical Lead
Real User
Helped us integrate our organizations with one tool

What is our primary use case?

There is one application that was in-house, which was developed by one of the internal in-house application itself. That application, we have integrated and we get support from the vendor, from Microsoft. We have set up the application in our environment. This is what I have done for three or four months for one or two applications.

Pros and Cons

  • "Integration between our departments has been the most valuable."
  • "We did the deployment with the help of Microsoft's consultants. But sometimes, we found it difficult to educate the application developers to integrate."

What other advice do I have?

I would rate Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security at an eight out of ten.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, IBM and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM). Updated: June 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Petter Vestengen
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Good for securing files, a mostly straightforward setup, and good technical support

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for MDM and file protection. Excellent for mail and Office365 aps on mobile devices and cloud services.

Pros and Cons

  • "The solution is very good at securing files. For example, if I forward a secure document, it's blocked from others, as I can send it with restrictions in relation to who can open it."
  • "The MDM part of the engine could be better."

What other advice do I have?

We have a business relationship with Microsoft. I'd recommend that product, however, planning is the most important thing an organization can do to prep for implementation. It's a good idea to get someone with experience and who understands your needs to assist you at the beginning. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.