The platform is scalable enough for the environment we are covering. We support multiple clients and manage around 10,000 to 20,000 systems for them; thus, it is quite a large environment.

I rate System Center nine out of 10 for scalability. It covers 65,000 servers at my company, so it's pretty scalable. 

It is a scalable solution. I rate the scalability of the product an eight out of ten.

Around five people in my company use the product.

As only a team of five people, consisting of developers, in my company uses the product to implement the dataflows, we don't plan to increase the users of the solution.

We're a fairly small organization. We only have a few thousand endpoints. That said, my understanding of it is that it has pretty massive scalability. The number of users that interact with it is just a handful. They are the admins and our IT department.

It's operating 24 hours a day and it's got a critical role doing those security updates. I would say it's used extensively.

The solution is easily scalable, however, its not just the amount of hardware that needs to be taken into consideration. The throughput of the environment is also impacted depending on the number of nodes being monitored and the frequency thereof.

We are not a large company but it's fine and it works properly.

I can imagine that we can scale this solution for a larger environment but that is not the case for us at this time.

It works on a virtual machine and I can configure the set-up of the two machines running to increase the number of services which we are monitoring. 

I wouldn't describe the solution as scalable. That's not necessarily why you would use it.

We manage about 15,000 clients with this product currently.

We do not plan to increase usage in the future.

No problem with scalability.

It is scalable. Scalability doesn't need any improvement. I can't have an entire view of this product because it's a very complex product and we use it now for basic stuff.