The stability is excellent.

I rate the product's stability an eight out of ten.

I rate System Center eight out of 10 for stability. 

I had no issues with the stability of the product.

The stability has been very reliable. We run a virtualized instance of the 2012 server that we have it deployed on, as that's what the documentation describes. In the course of seven years, we've only had to recover it once or twice when an update has gone sideways. We've always been able to do that. We've been pretty comfortable with it. We're careful about that.

If we're doing an update, we'll close the system before we do an update, and definitely do a backup of it and test immediately after the update. We can see if there are any issues and then roll back if necessary, until Microsoft fixes whatever part of the update that might have broken.

I rate Microsoft System Center an eight out of ten for stability.

The stability and overall performance of the solution are mainly dependent on the correct hardware specification, design, and implementation as is the case with most other ESM type solutions.

This solution is stable.

We are an external company service desk with seven to a desk and approximately sixty technicians. For internal use, we have six people. They are made up of six technicians or the IT administrators of databases, book sellers, some service managers and the setup of publications.

The solution is stable. We haven't had issues. It doesn't crash or freeze and there aren't bugs or glitches. It's reliable.

We've been using Microsoft products for many years and they are mature and very stable. 

The stability is okay.

It's stable. We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable.